May 19, 2014
Kristal Singletary
Capella University
MBA-FP6182 – Impact of Advances in Information Technology
Instructor: Joe Johnson
Introduction
Enterprise architecture (EA) is defined simply as a theoretical roadmap that identifies the formation and function of an organization with the goal to establish how the organization can most successfully attain its current and future objectives (SearchCIO, 2007). While there are many available EA frameworks available, a common theme between them are four distinct points-of-view. The business perspective defines the routine operational procedures and benchmarks. The interaction among these processes and standards is classified as the application perspective. An information perspective defines and classifies data the organization requires in order to effectively operation. Finally, the hardware, operating systems, programming, and networking solutions used by the organization make up the technology perspective. Apparent returns seen by the organizations utilizing enterprise architecture include enhancing managerial decision-making, increasing flexibility to shifting demands and market situations, removing unproductive and unnecessary procedures, enhancing resource usage.
Developed as methods to simplify the process of architecture development, enterprise architecture frameworks provide best practices, tools, standards, and templates to aid in the development of the EA (Oracle, 2009). The EA framework provides a method for streamlining the creation and maintenance of architectures and allows the organization to leverage best practices of architectural design. While a number of enterprise frameworks exist, each framework has the primary objective of tackling the basic challenge of assessing, aligning, and organizing business goals with technical requirements and strategies.
In this paper, I will discuss two EA frameworks – The Gartner Methodology and
References: Augusta. (2014). Department. Augusta, Georgia. Retrieved May 17, 2014 from http://www.augustaga.gov/8/Departments Augusta Commission. (2014). Augusta’s vision & goals. Augusta, Georgia. Retrieved May 17, 2014 from http://www.augustaga.gov/1657/Augustas-Visions-Goals Averson, P. (2003). The convergence of strategy, performance and enterprise architecture in the US federal government. Balanced Scorecard Institute: Strategy Management Group. Retrieved May 16, 2014 from http://balancedscorecard.org/performancereferencemodel/tabid/141/default.aspx Buchanan, R. (2010). Enterprise architecture program: Key initiative overview. Gartner, Inc. Retrieved May 16, 2014 from http://www.gartner.com/it/initiatives/pdf/KeyInitiativeOverview_EnterpriseArchitecturePlanning.pdf Holcman, S. (2014). Enterprise architecture and strategic planning in modern organizations. Pinnacle Business Group, Inc. Retrieved May 8, 2014 from http://www.eacoe.org/enterprise-architecture-and-strategic-planning.php Oracle. (2009). The Oracle enterprise architecture framework. Retrieved May 7, 2014 from http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/issue-archive/2010/10-jan/oea-framework-133702.pdf SearchCIO. (2007). Enterprise Architecture (EA). TechTarget. Retrieved May 7, 2014 from http://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/enterprise-architecture Sessions, R. (2007). A comparison of the top four enterprise-architecture methodologies. Microsoft Developer Network. Retrieved May 7, 2014 from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb466232.aspx