Preview

Merck River Blindness

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
288 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Merck River Blindness
“River Blindness”

In 1979, Dr. William Campbell, a research scientist working for Merck and Company, discovered evidence that one of the company’s drugs might kill the parasite that causes river blindness. He then decided to request permission to research this new finding. The mangers for the company noticed that it would take enormous amount of funding and time to develop this new vaccine.

This new product could be really hard to market and who was going to actually buy it; it could also damaged the market share that Merck currently had by selling the animal version of the vaccine Ivermectin. Despite all of this, Dr. P. Roy Vagelos chairman of Merck and Company and his fellow managers approved the necessary funding for the research

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    (15/15) Who was the scientist who came up with the vaccine and why is the method of administering it so effective?…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jenner’s discovery of the link between cowpox and smallpox was significant to the development of a vaccine for smallpox. However, it can be argued that Jenner and his discovery were not enough on their own to bring medical progress. The factors Scientific thinking, Government Communication and Changing attitudes played a major and important role to bring medical progress.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, in 1995 Wakefield also applied for a patent on the basis that measles could be found in the intestine, 3 years before he published his MMR findings. (Deer, How the vaccine crisis was meant to make money, 2011) This was a huge undisclosed conflict of interest. If Andrew Wakefield didn’t misrepresent the data like he did to find that the MMR vaccine was the cause of these symptoms it would cause huge financial problems for him. 2: an example of misinformation spread by anti-vaxxers on…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jonas Edward Salk

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even though scientists believe it was impossible to find treatment works very well with Poliovirus, but Dr.Salk found it. Because it was thought to be impossible to find the treatment, Dr.Salk insisted on his faith in his abilities to create something, in order to help people live healthily without polio. He decided to focus his research on polio, the inability of scientists before him to appropriate treatment made has the incentive to create a vaccine without mistake. He spent many hours a day inside his lab working and trying to…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “It was his gift to the world”, Trueman said about the vaccine. Jenner did not patent his vaccine, for If he had it would have made it out of reach for most people (Trueman). “I shall endeavour still further to prosecute this inquiry, an inquiry I trust not merely speculative, but of sufficient moment to inspire the pleasing hope of its becoming essentially beneficial to mankind” (Jenner). What mattered to him was the impact the vaccine would leave on the world. Edward Jenner devoted the rest of his life to spreading his vaccine.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Variola

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Immunization was discovered in 1796 when an English physician, Edward Jenner, saw that milkmaids didn’t get infected from the cowpox virus. This discovery led Dr. Jenner to an experiment infecting a boy by the name…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health Care Museum

    • 1262 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Henderson, D. A. (1997). Edward Jenner’s vaccine. Public Health Reports, 112(2), 116-21. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/230183418?accountid=458…

    • 1262 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Different approaches are employed to generate and also deliver a vaccine; each method has its own merits and demerits. Few of these merits are discussed below: The main advantage of genetically engineered organisms used as vaccines is that the proteins that are formed do not contain the complete viral strain. So it has no risks related to accidental immunization with live virus. Direct cloning into the DNA of vaccinia virus is promising, however vaccines using this method have not been released into the market yet (Nagy, 2001).…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immunizations are vital to modern society as they are scientifically proven to be safe and effective. “The harms of disease prevented by the vaccines outweigh the risks of…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Merck & Co

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As a licensee, Merck can allow smaller biotechnology firms to focus on research and development. These smaller firms often have smaller budgets and are not financially or personnel equipped to handle the costly and long FDA approval process, and the subsequent marketing, distribution, and sales of new drugs. This task is better suited for a larger company, such as Merck, which has more resources and money.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Vaccine War

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Palfreman, Jon, and Kate McMahon, prods. "The Vaccine War." Frontline. PBS. PBS.org. Public Broadcast System, 27 Apr. 2010. Web. 01 Mar. 2012.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not all tested vaccines make it when it comes to the rigorous regulations that are set for a vaccination to be approved. This information was concluded through research and trial. Each batch of vaccines are tested for safety, potency, and purity before being released to the public (Meadows 3). Also DNA technology and new delivery methods are leading scientists in new directions (“Ethical Issues” 2). Doing research and trials, is one of the most important parts of approving a vaccination other than the testing of the vaccination. Research shows that vaccines stimulate our bodies to make antibody proteins that target the bacteria or viruses once our bodies encounter them (Meadows 1). One of the most important findings about children and vaccinations, is that the population of children who are at the highest risk of getting sick are babies who are not yet old enough to be vaccinated (Heyworth 3). Research is mostly used to tell what needs to be fixed in order to put the vaccination into the testing…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the vaccine does NOT protect against. Two years earlier, scientists at Penn State had already…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Edward Jenner invented the vaccine in 1796. The original purpose for it was to protect people against smallpox. He noticed that even during the peak of the smallpox epidemic, the milkmaids never got the disease. After further research, he theorized that the reason why the milkmaids didn’t get smallpox was because they came in contact with cowpox while milking the cows. The cowpox strengthened their immune system against smallpox. Jenner extracted the liquid from the inside of a cowpox sore on a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes. Next, Jenner found a farmer named Phipps and asked him if he could inject his son, James, with the liquid. He explained to Phipps that if his theory was correct, James would never get smallpox. Phipps agreed. Jenner made two small cuts in the arm of the boy and poured the liquid from Sarah into the cuts. James came down with cowpox which lasted 6 weeks. After those 6 weeks, Jenner vaccinated him with the dried up pus from the sore of a smallpox victim. James didn’t catch smallpox. Jenner’s theory was correct, lucky for him. If he had been wrong, and James did catch smallpox and died, Jenner would have been considered a murderer. (A History of Vaccines)…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Wakefield has hypothesized that the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine causes inflammation of the intestines, which sends certain peptides to the bloodstream, and to the brain, that affects development. This study has since been retracted, and Wakefield lost his medical license. This paper is a fraud, Andrew Wakefield was paid over $674,000 by lawyers who intended to sue vaccine manufacturers, which is an obvious conflict of interest (Deer). He also did not collect data systematically. This study is extremely flawed, and though it has been retracted, it still causes much…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays