The first and foremost issue of both texts is gender socialization. In Mernissi's Size 6, for instance, one of the mentioned problems is that while women are required to look immature, childish and brainless, men are demanded to be maturer, bigger in both size and age. She puts the fault on not only men but also ladies. She suggests that cultured ladies should comprehend when their civil liberties are being misappropriated, emphasizing the reader that Western ladies are outraged by the veil but on the other hand are disparaging themselves by struggling to be something they are not, by yielding their satisfaction for a communal perfect. Be that as it may, men are to point to finger at as well. Mernissi employs Chinese footbinding as her representative of a corrupt practice of beauty promoted by the community. She asserts, ”Chinese men did not force women to bandage their feet to keep them from developing normally—all they did was to define the beauty ideal.” What she …show more content…
They constitute the concept of freedom differently, though. In Mernissi’s text, the hindrance of freedom discussed, the author articulates, is not through culturally forced regulations and dictates and the wearing of veils, but through the culturally inflicted Size 6 Harem. As stated by Mernissi, the size six harem is an exploit of subjugation for women, and it has tyrannically governed over the society, notwithstanding the fact that most might not concede it. Western women are undergoing the despotism of the size six since they believe they are constrained to put up with its standards. Still and all, the freedom in El Saadawi’s text is intellectual