Preview

Metaphysics is the main philosophy in Minority Report

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
627 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Metaphysics is the main philosophy in Minority Report
There are several branches of philosophy found in Minority Report –ethics, truth and metaphysics. Ethics is the study of morality; truth is the study of what is true; metaphysics questions reality. The most prominent philosophy in the film is metaphysics, due to it being the underlying philosophy that created the problem and causes the plot to occur in the first place.

Ethics and truth are branches of philosophy evident in the film. In Minority Report, the pre-cogs are 3 children who live in half-awake conditions and have previsions of murder scenes simply for a utilitarian purpose, and also the personal gain of Burgess. It is not right to forego the freedom, innocence and happiness of 3 children just to prevent murders. Even though it is true that they are “suffering” for the greater good, however, they are still human beings and should have equal rights. It might be a “gift” to be able to predict murders and stop them from happening, and thus saving lives, and improving the security and safety of the people, however, if it is at an expense of the three pre-cog’s childhood and freedom, the ethical values of the government are definitely questioned. Truth is another branch of philosophy found in the film as the Pre-crime Department functions solely based on the previsions of the pre-cogs, which they deem to always be true. As said by Witwer, the Pre-crime Department is “arresting individuals who have broken no law”. It is impossible to prove that they were going to murder without physical evidence that it actually happened. Furthermore, the analogy brought up by Anderton to justify “the fact that you prevented it does not change the fact that it wasn’t going to happen” is simply a straw man fallacy. Due to the laws of physics, it is supposed to fall due to gravity. However, it is impossible to predict what a human being does since every individual is different. A vision is not sufficient to prove a crime as big as murder, and simply because there have been no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    West Memphis Three Case

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Several elements of the confession did not match up. Such as the timing, the place, and how they were killed. All of these were extremely influential elements that should have been considered, but they were not. The police continued to guide Jessie until the testimony was closer to accurate. Jessie Misskelley’s confession was not obtained ethically by any standard, yet it was still used at trial to put away three teenage boys for a great majority of their lives.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the beginning of both Fahrenheit 451 and minority report they were both with what they're jobs were but in the end they had different opinions. In Fahrenheit 451 he was for burning all the books but then as the story unfolds he changes his perspective and is against it. He thinks that it is wrong to burn the books because the books have opinions. In minority report he was for the pre-crime and the per-cogs then he goes against it because of the fact that in the future he kills some one so he thinks that there a minority and steals a pre-cog.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial By Fire Case Study

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case of “Trial by Fire” presents how flawed expert testimony and prejudice influence a trial in a negative way. On December 23, 1991, Cameron Todd Willingham’s house burned while his three babies laid in their bedrooms sleeping, escaping with only minor injuries; he was arrested and charged with capital murder of his three daughters (Grann). The certified arson investigators stated that they found twenty indicators of arson after putting the fire out. They believed that Willingham was the one starting the fire. Thus, Willingham was offered a plea but refused and wanted to take his chances with a jury. He had always proclaimed his innocence; however, the jury made the decision to find him guilty and gave him the death penalty (Grann). Willingham was executed on the grounds that he committed arson. However, many aspects of the arson report have since been proved wrong. The central evidence relied upon at Willingham’s trial was the testimony of Fire Marshal Vasquez and Assistant Fire Chief Fogg, their findings of 20 indicators had already been subsequently discredited. The Arson Review Committee Report concludes that “each and every one of the indicators relied upon have since been scientifically proven to be invalid” (Ryan). It means that previous fire…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 5 describes how, within the last century, mounting scholarly evidence has exposed institutional flaws within our judicial and police systems, resulting in the convictions of innocent persons for capital crimes. In some cases, overzealous behavior by police and prosecutors, led to the imprisonment of “factually” innocent defendants. While police sometimes coerced confessions or failed to conduct full investigations, prosectors and judges failed to evidence which might exonerate the defendant. Other judicial violations found through study included failure to follow courtroom procedures related to rule of law. One of the first wrongful conviction initiatives was through a congressional investigation in 1912. Although a noble undertaking for its time, the reports was flawed in its evidentiary compilation. The data was poorly collected and its findings poorly deduced. According to the report, no innocent person had been executed by the Federal government.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Game of Ethics Eth/316

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Center of Education for Law and Democracy. (2010, August). Four Core Lenses: Ethical Decision-Making. Retrieved from , http://www.lawnaddemocracy.org/xcellens.html…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biased testimony towards the defendant resulted in a prejudice jury. Very frequently, statements like ‘We heard the facts, didn’t we?’ or ‘Pay attention to the facts’ are expressed in the jury room. The 4th Juror cited that the murder weapon was a knife so unique that ‘the storekeeper who sold it to him identified the knife in court and said it was the only one of its kind he ever had in stock.’ The 8th Juror argues that ‘It’s possible that the boy lost the knife and that someone else stabbed his father with a similar knife.’ None of the Juror’s believes this possibility as they have already established their prejudices against the accused. The 10th Juror says ‘Let’s talk facts. These people are born to lie… They think different. They act different.’ These are not ‘facts’ but prejudice opinions made by the 10th Juror about the socio-economic status of the boy. It can assumed that the ‘facts’ presented in this case can be viewed as biased opinions and reports that impairs the true facts.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is better that one should suffer than that many should be corrupted. Consider the matter dispassionately, Mr. Foster, and you will see that no offence is so heinous as unorthodoxy of behavior. Murder kills only the individual-and, after all, what is an individual?... We can make a new one with the greatest ease-as many as we like. Unorthodoxy threatens more than the life of a mere individual; it strikes at Society itself." (Huxley, 148) what is clearly seen as the most important is the stability of the community and nothing else. The World State has used conditioning, entertainment, soma, and restrictions to mold their citizens into a blinded community of living, but ignorant (dead of brain) people. The World State has conditioned its citizens to transform them into a group of ignorant, blind, and naive people with no self worth, no thoughts of their own, and no personal identity. The price for social stability is not worth paying for, it is not worth losing one’s true self. It is not worth losing the freedom to flower and grow into the person one was meant to…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Csi Effect

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In order to accurately depict how the CSI Effect strongly influences our society’s view on crime and courtroom proceedings, I will be comparing different CSI episodes to those methods and theories which apply. Throughout the paper, I will be explaining how CSI has shaped peoples’ minds in believing false claims and investigation beliefs. Watching and comparing episodes of CSI to the CSI Effect will be a prime reference in explaining how the media is placing a spin on CSI television shows.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many argue we have moved forward with progress on some social matters such as recent Supreme Court decisions on gay marriage rights. Some argue progress would mean readdressing particular constitutional issues such as the second amendment. However, in each case the interpretation, what is progress for some is the opposite of others. The perception of volatile issues is clouded by people’s stereotypes and confounded by the blind spots. One side sees their stereotype of a gun toting theater attendee as a menace to a civilized society; the other side’s stereotypical view sees a potential hero that adverts a tragedy. If the stereotypes’ blind spots were exposed, both sides could see the merits of the other side’s argument and that no simple answers exist. The ambiguity of moral codes may best be portrayed in popular culture by the serial killer character Dexter. Dexter uses his own “moral code” to justify his serial killing of murderers who have beat the system. While this is pure fiction, it reflects how moral codes are developed by one’s interpretations of the pictures in their heads. Whether or not we are in the dawn of a new a Progressive Era, only history will tell. What is certain, the current twenty-first-century university student has unprecedented access to information…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A wrongful conviction is when a subsequent investigation finds that an individual who has been tried and found guilty of a crime is, in fact, innocent of that crime” (Bako). A wrongful conviction is not just a simple mistake, lives and families are devastated. This happens more often than people think it does. Even though this person very well may be innocent, it takes years to even appeal their case if they can even get that far. The key issues with wrongful convictions are that prosecutors rely on unreliable evidence such as eyewitness identification of a person that does not really know what he or she saw on that specific date and much, much more. The Innocence project strives to exonerate those whose rights have been unconstitutionally taken away from them through the use of DNA evidence. “The development of DNA testing has allowed the Innocence Project to help exonerate 344 innocent Americans - 20 of whom were on death row (Bako).” These 344 exonerees represent how the American criminal justice system can fail the people she was designed to protect. The innocence project works to raise awareness to the issue our justice system faces when it comes to minorities in particular. Continued research and advocacy, as well as improving the effectiveness of the criminal justice process itself, are all necessary steps to ensuring the innocence of those wrongly accused of a crime. Over 75% of…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Worldview Paper

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Metaphysical is what has regarded as the key problem of the whole speculative field of philosophy (Wilson, 2010). Epistemology is the study or theory of knowledge (Wilson, 2010). Ethics is a major branch of philosophy, and is the study of value or quality. Philosophical Anthropology is the study of human nature (Wilson, 2010). All of these components are important and are what worldviews…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    So is it the police and their interrogation tactics that are to blame or is it the judicial system and the jury of one’s peers that has failed to look at evidence, confessions, and the beyond a reasonable doubt theory when evaluating suspects? Police officers are required to investigate and submit evidence of individuals guilt based on learning and circumstances that typically they have little knowledge of, the tactics in which police officers gather as much information as they can to pursue the suspect they believe committed the crime should be irrelevant as long as these tactics don’t violate individuals rights. The duty then lies within the courts to evaluate the information presented and determine whether or not the information is valid. Kassin (2008) describes solutions of a reformed system as improving the way jurors and judges evaluate confessions simply by being able to see how that confession was gathered in the first place. Requiring police agencies to record all interrogations and provide this recording to jurors and judges would not only force the police to operate within the rights of the individual; but it allows jurors and judges to see the process by which the confession occurred and determine the…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torture and Ethics

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Souryal, S. (2007) Ethics in criminal justice: In search of the truth (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Pub./LexisNexis.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the course of the film prejudice was instrumental in acting as the defining factor to prove whether the boy was guilty or not. Juror 3 on many occasions linked the case of a boy killing his father with his personal…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film “12 Angry Men” is a 1957 drama consisting of a dozen men on jury, who attempt to reach a verdict involving a teenager in a murder case. A guilty verdict was initially predicted, but the jury members start questioning and reasoning the testimonies given in court. Was the boy being accused of stabbing his father really guilty? All the information regarding the timing of the train, the timing of the murder, and the testimonies did not add up. Through much debate, a complex voting process, and many concepts learned through SCOM, the jury managed to attain a not-guilty ruling due to the inadequate testimonies and facts gathered.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays