Preview

Torture and Ethics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1450 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Torture and Ethics
Torture and Ethics
Bradley Sexton
April 13, 2013
University of Phoenix
AJS 512 Dr. Miron Gilbert

Torture and Ethics
The torturing of human life always has been and always will be unethical, immoral, unjust, and wrong. Torturing enemy combatants or high-value targets does violate standards of morality in the free world. In addition to violating international laws against such practices, torture violates every basic human right. Torture is a form of cruel and unusual punishment by any standard regardless of the end result. Torture of one individual is only justifiable by saving the lives of the many, but that does not make it moral or right. The only ethical theory that justifies torture as moral acceptable is the utilitarianism view. This view should remain in the dark ages where it belongs because it is not an example of the moral standards that exit today.
For some people, the thought of torturing one person to save the lives of many sounds like the right idea. The problem with torture is the end result is not guaranteed. Under extreme measures people will say whatever it takes to stop the pain. Torturing lowers the moral standards of the people performing the act to the same standards they are fighting against. In the long run this only fuels the enemy 's commitment to their cause and makes them stronger. An enemy combatant who is considering volunteering information will not come forward if he or she thinks there is a possibility of torture on the other side. Although it is true that other countries have already used torture on American people, future prisoners of war may receive even worse treatment if the enemy knows their prisoners are undergoing torture. The use of cruel and unusual punishment during interrogation violates human rights and makes any evidence obtained unusable in a court of law. The government and the criminal justice system must observe and follow the same laws they expect society to follow. Laws apply to everyone equally in



References: Driver, J (2009) "The History of Utilitarianism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/utilitarianism-history/>. Himma Kenneth (2009) Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Philosophy of Law Retrieved on 4-14-2013 from http://www.iep.utm.edu/law-phil/ PSU (2007) Ethics in Criminal Justice components of justice retrieved on 3-31-2013 from https://courses.worldcampus.psu.edu/welcome/crimj465/moral_05.html  Souryal, S. (2007) Ethics in criminal justice: In search of the truth (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Pub./LexisNexis. Evans, R (2007) The Ethics of Torture, Human Rights and Human Welfare. Retrieved on 4-13-2013 from http://www.du.edu/korbel/hrhw/volumes/2007/evans-2007.pdf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can events in real life show what is going to happen in the short future? Showing foreshadowing can be essential for a short story. There are a wide variety in lines of foreshadowing, that are well displayed, in the stories “The Scarl Ibis” by James Hurst and “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allen Poe. In the short story “The Scarl Ibis”, a line which includes foreshadowing is, “I ran as fast as I could, leaving him far behind with a wall of rain dividing us” (Hurst 323). This shows that Doodle, the little brother will die, because throughout the book Doodle tells the narrator to not leave him and he is left and dies in the harmful weather. In the piece, James Hurst presents this in a moment of fear and chaos that makes the foreshadowing more interesting and intriguing. While…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If torture is used in retaliation and as an “eye to eye” concept, then torture would be an unethical way of punishing someone (Guidebook). For this example, I would argue that torture is being used to provide the members with the realization for their actions, so torture is an unethical way of punishment. Also, torture is not a replacement for the death penalty, so it is not saving an individual’s life because in the guidebook it states that if “torture is vengeful and not being used to protect innocent lives, then it is not technically a moral reason for punishing someone” (Guidebook). Without protecting innocent lives, torture cannot be considered an ethical reason for punishing someone, so I would argue that the type of punishment that should be used is an elongated amount of jail time. Incarceration meets all the requirements for being a moral type of punishment because it doesn't cause mental harm that torture would and incarcerating the members would not be a retaliating…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This in no way is a good for mankind in general. Torturing another being of your kind is an absolute anarchy! The right versus right dilemma in this case is truth versus loyalty. The soldiers involved in the torturing may not all want to be involved in the acts, and possibly got the information from the suspect and wants to report it. However, if majority of the troops wanted to do torturing acts, high ranking officers wanted to, would you say no? Peer pressure has been the most influential stimulant for centuries. Battling alongside the group of men and women for months, sometimes for years, loyalty and bonds are formed. This is an ethical dilemma that I find really boggling. The resolution I would use in this dilemma would be the Care-based model. "Do onto others, as you would want done to you" is a saying parents have been using for years, could they be more true? If they were in another country and were captured, I highly doubt they'd give up information and secrets about military or government plans. If that occurred, he would be looked upon as a traitor. The government needs to stick to human rights principles and stick by the book in imprisonment…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy In Torture

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Advocates of torture argue that torture is a necessary tool especially in time sensitive scenarios, like if an individual is the only person alive who knows the whereabouts of a bomb that is set to detonate, resulting in the deaths of hundreds. I could not even imagine how stressful the interview process of this scenario would be, as time progresses and no results are being produced, inflicting pain does not only have the possibility of yielding results but it would also be a convenient way to externalize your frustrations.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the topic of torture, most of us will readily agree that torturing someone in order to get information is not the answer. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of how guilty a person is, and what should be done in the case of a bombing. On the one hand, people argue that torture is unconstitutional and should not be practiced because it questions a person’s morality and what they are willing to do in order to get results. On the other hand, however, others argue that we should allow torture because it is more just than allowing thousands of innocents to die because we didn’t want to question a single person. I have mixed feelings on the topic. While I recognize that our actions may be for the greater good, we cannot allow ourselves to lose our morality because of it. I do not believe that a person should be tortured for information unless it is under specific circumstances. What I mean by this is that people should not torture someone unless that person is obviously guilty or it is…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many questions relating to the use of torture against any person whatsoever. As such, there are different perspectives on the ethics of its usage as well. While some believe that the use of torture becomes necessary at times, others believe that whatever the circumstances are, torture can never be justified. Some very pertinent issues related to the use of torture are, “Suppose a child has been kidnapped and a person has been suspected of committing the crime. Is it justifiable to torture that person in order to try to extract information from him about the child? Now suppose the person would not react at all if he is subjected to torture but there is a chance that he would divulge information if his child of the similar age as the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay About Torture

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I think if the person is being tortured and has done something wrong, has endangered many innocent lives or is directly involved with a heinous crime, then it would be rational to use torture. However, I am a little skeptical if the person being tortured will become delusional and say something incorrect. Nevertheless, torture is never moral. Moreover, if people torture others purely for their own benefit, then that is treating humans as objects, “mere means" to an end (Bailey). Torture may be rational in some cases, however, it is never morally justifiable, as it is inflicting emotional and physical harm and treating humans as…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper addresses one of the most abiding and heated controversies surrounding the topic of torture and morality. Put simply, this controversy concerns the issue of whether under extreme and exceptional circumstances, a government agency should be legally permitted to use torture as a means of punishment or extracting information. According to Oxford Dictionary, torture is defined as “The action of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment or in order to force them to do or say something”.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a matter of fact, the Association for the Prevention of Torture points out, “Further, using torture ourselves allows other countries to more easily justifying using torture against our own soldiers and nationals” ("Defusing the Ticking Bomb Scenario" 845). If tormenting captured victims to get further intelligence, then our country is not doing nothing but setting a bad example for the nations around the world. Much less, more innocents might become victims of torture because of a pure excuse of the government wanting to keep the people safe. Even if any of attackers was captured and tortured for information, surely they have already had everything planned to put them to action. Innocents would die of we were to threat and torture or even kill the person captured.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of torture is being very current and it arouses debate between those who are totally against it; those who think that it sometimes can be used for good; and those who are in between. The idea of torture was seen only as something that happened far away in time, and it should not even be considered as an issue of the modern society. Furthermore, torture was seen as a violation of the fundamental human rights, which were protected by different human rights conventions. But then something happened and actually influenced the general opinion about the issue of torture. Criminal attacks nowadays are not very rare. As long as we continue to be threatened from those criminal attacks, this issue will always be current, and there will always be space for controversy. The importance of the issue of torture is in that it lies between the ideas of whether it is more important to protect human rights or use it as a mean of obtaining important information which could be used for the safety of the society. In one hand there are those who think that torture is against the fundamental human rights, and should not be used in any case. On the other hand, there’s this group of people whose opinion was directly affected by the criminals attacks all over the world, especially after September 11th, 2001 when the twin towers were attacked and a lot of people lost their life. This was a turning point in the general opinion and led people to think that by torturing criminals, information could get obtained and such attacks could be prevented from happening, or at least the number of such attacks could decline. Should the right of not being tortured be protected by the human rights or should the officials consider torture as a mean to be used by governments in the prosecution of terror and war? I would argue that torture should be used in some circumstances, as long as governments use it as a mean of obtaining important information, which would…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Debating Torture

    • 17599 Words
    • 71 Pages

    Once upon a time (as in about 4 years ago) the issue of 'torture' (i.e. whether it is ever acceptable to use it) was very rarely debated - and when it was debated, defending torture was considered an extremely hardline to defend. That reality existed for a good reason - namely that torture is almost unimaginably terrible, and should never be something that people speak of lightly. In fact the few times I remember torture being raised in debates at IV's was, like slavery, as an almost perfect example of a natural human right - the sort of thing that was an incontrovertibly good principle (the prohibition on its use that is) regardless of culture, religion, ethnicity, etc.…

    • 17599 Words
    • 71 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is in MY opinion, yes i do think we should because people shouldn’t be deserved to be tortured, if someone were to kill someone the person that killed the person would still not deserve to be tortured because no one deserves to be tortured and no one should be. Being tortured is suffering pain, it’s something no one should experience and no one should do. If you were to torture someone would you feel happy?, would you feel satisfied?, would you not feel guilty that you put someone in physical, mental and emotional pain? No one should have to be…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is torture justified? Does it make us feel safer? Most Americans would say that it is immoral to torture any human being for any reason. There are a few people left who would disagree with that and say that some deserve to be tortured in order to obtain information that could potentially save the lives of hundreds or thousands.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torture Essay Example

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the main arguments against torture is that it is immoral. There are plenty of arguments to whether torture should be legalized or not. Alan Dershowitz believes that torture should be legalized for life saving events. This may be true; however, Phillip Heymann believes that legalizing torture would begin a slippery slope towards widespread use of torture in less extreme situations, making torture become a common place. After considering both sides to the debate I agree with . I would be skeptical about legalizing torture because of “crooked cops”. Some people of higher authority might take advantage of their privileges, and like Heymann inquired, they might use torture for little situations which would be completely inappropriate. If torture was legalized, authorities would probably be able to find out more information about a certain situation, like a bomb threat. Even though that would be helpful, you shouldn’t treat a human in such a brutal manner, no matter what they did. It’s very hard to make a decision on whether torture should be legalized or not but I don’t believe that it would be a good thing in America. I believe torture is immoral, it is not effective, and it cannot be justified.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics