Metropolis And Mental Life

George Simmel trusted that modern life's most profoundly established issues, originated from people attempting to maintain independence in a society that requests conformity, with a traditionalist outlook. In Simmel’s, “The Metropolis and Mental Life”, he concentrated on the subjective culture of the small town and the objective culture of a populous, urban city and how it influences the individual. Living in a large populous metropolis, has a tendency to dull an individual’s mind, causing them have diminished mental activity and constraining them to be as far expelled from their inward identity as possible. Thus, rural life urges individuals to have a more personal connection with different individuals in that city. In expansive terms,
Simmel conveys that man is reliant on differences. The more habitual and the smaller changes are that are happening closer to one’s present encounters, the less observable they are. Simmel alludes to these small changes as lasting impressions, and depicts them to be less mentally taxing, than fast and quick paced changes which portrays the lifestyle of the metropolis. Simmel interfaces these conditions and the structures of a metropolis, which he portrays as a sort of concentrated modernity, on the individuals who are presented to them. (Karageorgis) He comprehensively clarifies, without completely differentiating internal characteristic, that some individuals are more presented to the conditions than others and that there are components of everybody's lives that are more open than
The metropolitan type, utilizes this protective organ, as resistance against external disturbances which debilitate it. Dissimilar to that of a smaller town. the metropolitan type responds with a rational attitude, which accords them an uncaring mindset, discarding them from connecting to the intensity of one’s personality. Simmel called this , “intellectualistic quality”, depicting it as a strategy of guarding inner life from the city life. Simmel explains the concept that, a “purely intellectualistic” individual, will be aloof regarding anything personal, this is to avoid reactions and relationships that are not comprehended by rationality. This drives people to only give their attention on things that can be measured and seen objectively. Additionally, there is also a need within public settings, whether its voluntary or was put there, to separate oneself. This is implied by people separating themselves from each other. Not in the literal sense, but in the emotional, personal sense, to manage a personal preserve. These circumstances allow for more anonymity, and more individuality, that has more freedom and accessibility. Simmel also presents the concept of having an attitude of not really troubling the individual, the fast changes and contrasts will not element an immense change to the individual’s state of