Preview

Mexican War Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
789 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mexican War Dbq
The United States in 1846 was not justified in going to war with Mexico. The United States did not have proper justification to respond with violence against the Mexican government. The war with Mexico was also a product of the United States’ belief of Manifest Destiny. Polk’s over ambition to seize new territory from the Mexicans and disappointment over their refusal to sell him California also possibly played a factor in his willingness to wage war against Mexico. The United States under the leadership of President Polk clearly provoked Mexico into attacking US troops. To no extent was the Mexican War a justifiable war. All these reasons show that the US had no business starting a war with Mexico for territory that was rightfully theirs.
The war with Mexico came at a time when much of the country had strong feelings of Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny is the belief that fate had preordained the US to expand from the Atlantic to the Pacific oceans and from Canada to the Rio Grande. “the nation of many nations is destined to manifest to mankind the excellence of divine principles….it shall be a hemisphere – its roof the firmament of the star-studded heavens…” (Document 1). This ideal had strong influence and was one reason that there was so much popular support for the US expansion west. This ideal, while nationalistic, did not give Polk the right to go into Mexico and seize land which was rightfully theirs. The US vision of manifest destiny helped to win the public’s support for the Mexican war (Doc 2). Yet the public was misled by this sense of Manifest Destiny and those that did support it supported an unjust war. During his presidency, President Polk lusted for more land than the country had ever dreamed to control. The land Polk desired the most was California. While attempting to gain California through peaceful means, he sent John Slidell to Mexico City to offer the Mexicans up to $25 million dollars for California but was rejected by the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    During his presidency, Polk added many acres to the American territory. For instance, the most famous is Texas, which originally had been part of Mexico. A critical review of his controversial actions, as well as the philosophy of Manifest Destiny, attempts to present a review of his presidency, whose leadership led to various changes in the US topography. Thus, the memory of Polk’s…

    • 1271 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Synthesis Essay

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Manifest Destiny, or land stealing? The war against mexico and the us, which took place north of the Rio Grande, broke out May 1846. The land north of the Rio Grande was disputed by the US and Mexico. Because the United States decided to occupy disputed territory Mexico attacked. With that said, is the United States justified in declaring war against Mexico? The United States was not justified in going to war because they deprived Mexico from their land, occupying territory in dispute and it was mexico's territory.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    James K. Polk was the president of the United States of America during the Mexican-American War. Congress agreed upon James K. Polk declaring war on Mexico. The war was fought over the possession of Texas. In 1836 Texas won their independence from Mexico. The United States of America wanted to annex Texas then, but did not because they wanted to avoid a war with Mexico. President Polk supported the annexation of Texas, regardless of the war that it could potentially start. Therefore, with James K. Polk’s support Texas was admitted into the union on December 29, 1845. After this event, tension rose between the United States and Mexico over border disputes. In July of 1845, James K. Polk ordered troops into the land between the Rio Grande Rivers…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, the internal opposition began with the strong anti-slavery movement that grew as a result of efforts by abolitionists. Over time, support for emancipation was garnering steadily and quickly, however, this meant that the conflict between slave and free states continued to rise as well. Because of this, the Mexican American war only escalated the high tensions; the question of what was to be done with the possible acquisition of an extremely large territory was posed, in regards to the balance of slave and free states. Abolitionist saw that the war posed an extreme threat to this balance, and would only expand slavery to the land that would be acquired. Henry Clay, a senator, expressed his view that was very similar to those who…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although James Knox Polk doubled the size of the nation, he is rarely acknowledged by modern historians because of his machinations in initiating the start of the Mexican War. Without his efforts, however, America would be cut off at the Missouri River, exclude Texas, and have a disparate legacy of slavery and race relations as known today (Merry 17). Polk’s presidency was characterized by rapid expansion of American territory through war and treaties, as was William McKinley's. In McKinley’s period, as a consewuence of the Spanish American War, the United States acquired dominance of Hawaii, the Philippines, Puerto Rico, and Cuba. Of course, while there were significant differences between Polk’s and McKinley’s presidencies, it’s nevertheless…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Mexico Dbq Analysis

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This can best be explained in the following quote, “In the eyes of the [Mexican] government, the mobilization of the US army was an outright attack on Mexico” (Document C). This clearly demonstrates that Mexico had no idea that the US army was only checking the land. After all of the troubles that have been going on between Mexico and the US, the Mexicans believed that the US was attacking them. Another piece of evidence is, “.... As a consequence, the Mexican government reaffirmed the instruction to protect the border, meaning the territory located between the Rio Grande and the Nueces River- and order which led to the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma….” (Document C). This means that the Mexican army was ordered to shoot them because they believed that it was an attack. If Mexico had known that the US was checking the land, they would not have fired on the US army and would have asked them to leave their territory. The US had no reason to go to war with Mexico because, in reality, Mexico did not do anything to the Americans. What the Mexicans did was an accident because they never knew that the Americans were coming. To the Americans it may have seen like the Mexicans were trying to actually kill their soldiers, but in the eyes of the Mexicans, they did it to protect their beloved country. They fired to protect their citizens from the selfishness of the Americans, they did it because it seemed like a threat to them. That is the reason why they did, they never did it on purpose. Although there are many variables that led to the Mexican-American war, the invasion of the US towards Mexican territory being one of them, another variable would be that the US had no respect towards Mexican…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the 1840s, the US aspired to annex Texas and incorporate it as a state within the Union. However, gaining Texas had its consequences as it lead a war with Mexico. William Ellery Channing, an abolitionist and pacifist, saw that the policy regarding obtaining Texas would led the “nation into war” as it severed as “encroachment,” and a way “to propagate the curse of slavery.” (Doc 2) The annexation of Texas was seen invading Texas’ link to Mexico as in document one, the American Review stated the annexation “shall dissolve the slight bounds that now link the province to Mexico” (Doc 1) This served as a situation for Mexico, who had refused to recognize Texas’ independence and its takeover by the United States, although President James Polk, a strong supporter of the annexation of Texas as seen in his Inaugural Address- where he stated “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent states,” attempted to aid Mexico in coming to an understanding. Therefore, the Mexican War broke out, out of the effort for Texas to break free its bond to Mexico. Eventually, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and came to an agreement that included setting boundaries for Texas and the acquisition of new territory- California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mexican War Dbq

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Mexican war was a war worth fighting for a few reason. The first key reason that we should have fought this war is that it was in the best interest of the country at the time and the many people in the U.S. believed in manifest destiny which was the belief that the expansion of the U.S. was justified and important. Another reason that this war would have been justified is that at the time was that mexico was a fairly new country. They had only gained independence from spain about 20 years before the mexican war. The U.S. didn’t think that Mexico was capable of controlling the amount of land that they claimed as theirs. It said in Document A that, “Mexico never can exert any real government over such a country” A third reason that this…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    mexican american war

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They wanted to achieve Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny is expanding the U.S from that Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. American forces quickly took over New Mexico and California, and then they started to invade Northeastern Mexico and Northwest Mexico. American minister in Mexico thought it would be good to cede California to settle debts.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In chapter three of “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos,” Acuna explains the cause of the war between Mexico and North America. Eugene C. Barker states that the immediate cause of the war was “the overthrow of the nominal republic by Santa Anna and the substitution of centralized oligarchy” which allegedly would have centralized Mexican control (Acuna 39). Texas history is a mixture of selected fact and generalized myth. The expansion and capitalist development moved together. The two Mexican wars gave U.S. commerce, industry, mining, agriculture, and stock rising. The truth is that the Pacific Coast belonged to the commercial empire that the United States was already building in that ocean. In the Polk-Stockton Intrigue, Americans found it rather more difficult than other people to deal rationally with their wars. Many Anglo-American historians attempted to dismiss it simply as a “bad war”, which took place during the era of Manifest Destiny. Most studies on the war dwell on the causes and results of the war, and dealing with war strategy. The attitude of Mexicans toward Anglo-Americans was obviously influenced by the war and vice-versa. In the end, by late 1847 the war was almost at an end. Scott’s defeat of Santa Anna in a hard fought battle at Churubusco…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years Americans across the country believed in manifest destiny. This is the belief that God wanted Americans to expand the United States to the Pacific Ocean. In addition, they were also pro-slavery. In spite of their ideals, there was one entity stopping them from fulfilling and continuing their beliefs ; Mexico. Although Mexico was precluding their aspirations, it didn’t give the United States the right to go to war.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    mexican war

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Mexican American War was a conflict between the United States and Mexico. This was a battle for land where Mexico was fighting to keep what they thought was their property and the U.S. desired to retain the disputed land of Texas and obtain more of Mexico’s northern lands. There were two main causes of the Mexican War. First, the idea of “Manifest destiny” meaning the belief that America had a God-given right to occupy and civilize the whole continent. As large number of Americans migrated towards the west searching for land, the fact that most of those areas already had people living in them was ignored. Instead, an attitude and belief that democratic Americans would do a better job of running the lands than the Native Americans prevailed. President Polk shared and led the vision of Manifest Destiny, and did offer to buy the southwest land from Mexico. However, the Mexican government refused the offer, and because of this tensions continued to rise. The second major cause of the Mexican War actually started off with the Texas War of independence .During the 1830s, Mexico needed settlers in the under populated northern parts of the country and therefore allowed U.S. citizens to come and live in the Texas area as long as they took an oath of allegiance to Mexico and converted to Catholicism. Thousands of Americans accepted the invitation and migrated to the Mexican province of Texas. Texas was annexed by the United States in 1845. Mexico claimed the international border to be the Nuecos River, while the U.S. claimed the border to be at the Rio Grande. The Nuecos River runs roughly parallel to the Rio Grande about fifty to one-hundred miles northeast (the Texas side) of it. Therefore, by claiming their respective river boundaries, both countries were trying to expand their territory. When the Mexican army crossed the Rio Grande and skirmished with U.S. soldiers, President Polk declared that America had been invaded and American blood had been shed. These words…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact they had no interest at all, even if it was a good deal was a bad mistake and caused an uprise in emotions. Also looking at Polk’s address to congress, calling for war it says, “...Mexico has passed the boundary of the United States, has invaded our territory, and shed American blood upon the American soil.” Showing that they made bad choices and Mexico’s government, knowing it was our land, crossed over and cause chaos. They repeatedly made choice to spark…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Francisco A. Amador-Ortiz 11/14/2014 Ms. Pass History 100 Oral Presentation Paper (Mexican American War) One of the first U.S. armed conflict that was military fought on foreign soil was The Mexican-American War sometimes known as the Invasion of Mexico that was fought from 1846-1848 (Merry, pg.176). In that two-year battle our President at the time James K. Polk who believed in the manifest destiny wanted to spread across the continent and claim new land. Unlucky for Mexico they where not prepared for such an invasion which came to many new territory’s such as California, Utah, and Nevada. Due to the beliefs of president Polk we now own what is today present southwest part of the U.S. territory along with Mexico losing almost one third of its territory.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican War

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A war between the U.S. and Mexico spanned the period from 1846 to 1847. The war was initiated by Mexico and resulted in Mexico's defeat and the loss of approximately half of its national territory in the north. The United States was unjustified in going to war with Mexico; this was due to the fact that the land was rightfully claimed by Mexico, our lack of acknowledgment towards the Mexican government, and the fact that Mexico was just protecting their borders.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays