Preview

Militarists, Friedrich Von Bernhardi, And A US Pacifism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
904 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Militarists, Friedrich Von Bernhardi, And A US Pacifism
After World war one, people were divided on the idea of the necessity of war. The destruction of cities and towns made people not want to have to fight for some ideas they didn’t even believe in. But even after all this some militarists in Europe still believed that war was a necessity of human nature. While looking at a source for a European militarists, Friedrich Von Bernhardi, and a U.S. Pacifist, William James, I will compare these two sources to how both authors define war, if they believe it's possible to eliminate war, and what they believe is the solution to fixing war is. I will also give my opinion on what I believe war’s purpose is. To begin with the topic of authors definition of war, both authors describe war differently. Bernhardi’s …show more content…
Bernhardi doesn’t believe that even if it could we shouldn’t get rid of it. Bernhardi believes that war is a biological necessity and that if we were to get rid of war, it would cause worldwide unhealthy development. In his eyes, war is a good teacher by saying that we wouldn’t learn as humans if we didn’t have war to show us our mistakes. He views war as a competition which this competition creates the strongest group of people. When nations go to war they throw everything they have at the other nation to show their strengths. Bernhardi even goes into Darwin’s theory to back up his ideas that war is survival of the fittest to persuade people that war is not such a bad thing. William James’ idea of eliminating war cannot be completely done away with but should be able to be minimized. He uses the example of the United States and our relationship with Great Britain. We’ve remained allies over a long period of time and continue to trade with them as a show of peaceful interaction. He explains that getting rid of war would be a fantasy of a utopian society. In this idea I would have to side with Bernhardi in that war makes the strongest individuals. I wouldn’t say that we should go picking fights with people but we shouldn’t back down if any nation or group is threatening our way of life. Even after this point we need to explore their ideas of combating

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Storm of Steel Paper

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to answer this question it is first important to determine the fraises “pro-war” and “anti-war”. The term “pro-war” describes an attitude in which war is desired, necessary or justifiable. The term “anti-war” describes the opposite; war is viewed as immoral and is generally opposed and condemned. This paper will argue that there are grounds in the book to support both proposition.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    War brings death and destruction, merciless slaughter and butchery, disease and starvation, poverty and ruin in its wake. Although war may not always be the first answer or the most beneficial, it is an inescapable evil because war has brought the world peace and prosperity while banding people together to fight for a cause. It leads to national growth and solves domestic problems between countries; Injustice and tyranny can be quelled as the aftereffect of war. On the contrary, war includes loss of human life, spreads of diseases, and induces a feeling of anxiety and dismay among communities. The brutal sacrifices that innocent people undergo may not be worth the outcome.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the book, he has challenged preconceived notions that have made his book persuasive about the necessity of studying war, so as to go into greater detail about the debates that he has introduced the reader to. One such example is that ‘war is bad’. One might think, especially in context to liberals that wars should not be fought and nations should resolve all their disputes peacefully through arbitration. Howard has presented examples of when it is essential to fight in a war, for example when war is necessary for freedom. Another example is of liberal visionaries like the Italian, Mazzini, whose ideas of peace could manifest through what he thought to be a just war. In this case it had to be war to get rid of their oppressive Austrian rulers.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military theory spans centuries of conflict all across the world. As such, military theorists have written in a variety of military climates, varying from the absence of gun powder to the presence of nuclear weapons. However, some military theories are transcendent. Some elements of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz are eternally wise. While their similarities may become universal truths, their differences are equally worthy of study because, it is in the differences where choices are made. Sun Tzu and Clausewitz agreed that war is chaos, military action is a tool for diplomatic goals and, as such, the results of warfare are not final. Their differences lie in how they advocate for waging war. The style and preparations for war contrast. This is where…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People believe that there is no benefit to war. Others believe that there is benefits to war. War is necessary and beneficial for many reasons, those reasons are; to maintain alliances, to make new allies, and to provide jobs.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final

    • 2012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing! Around the World everyday there is some type of war happening. War affect everyone and thousands or even millions die because of war. The problem or issue that I’m going to talk about is why war is morally wrong and can war ever be justified. This Essay will talk about many thing including the three traditions of thought that dominate the ethics of war and peace: Realism; Pacifism; and the Just War Theory. Another thing I’m going to talk about is why war should be understood as an actual intentional and widespread armed conflict between political communities. I’m also going talk where does the church stand on the topic of war. There are lots of debates on war whether it a good thing or an awful thing on the face of the earth. So the controversy behind this topic that some people believe that you can achieve a common good by going to war. By that I mean war help out the economy, For Example in 1930’s The Great Depression was happening and World War II brought jobs that caused The Great Depression to end. The Other group of people believe that going to war is completely wrong, that you will not achieve anything and make the situation worst. For Example, pretend the rebel took out the angry dictator, the country will be unsettled with no government or Constitution. Post World War II, The United Nations (UN) is an intergovernmental organization established 24 October 1945, to promote international co-operation. A replacement for the ineffective League of Nations, the organization was created following the Second World War to prevent another such conflict. Most of the time War violate human rights, For Example in World War Two there was a Jewish Genocide. Acts of genocide violate the most fundamental and broadly accepted principles of human conduct. The World Wars, and the huge losses of life and gross abuses of human rights that took place during them, were a driving force behind the development of modern human…

    • 2012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2003, Nobel Laureate Richard E. Smalley identified war as the sixth biggest problem facing humanity for the next fifty years. In the 1832 treatise On War, Prussian military general and theoretician Carl von Clausewitz defined war as follows: "War is thus an act of force to compel our enemy to do our will."…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why War Is Bad

    • 2519 Words
    • 11 Pages

    War, what is it good for? I feel war, is good for absolutely nothing at all. What is the value of a life? Why do some feel that war is acceptable? Is war part of our biological make up? Could we seek out an alternative to war? These are some of the questions that are asked when it comes to the controversy surrounding war. There are differing opinions and views as well, from the pro-war, too the activists against war, the political, and the philosophy of war. No matter how you look at it though, I believe that we can find a better way. I think we have come far enough along in the evolutionary scale that we could settle our differences better than acting like animals, fighting and killing over territory.…

    • 2519 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Warefare

    • 842 Words
    • 3 Pages

    War is a presence in today’s world, and it’s not going anywhere anytime soon. There will always be conflicts throughout the world, it is how we handle them that could affect our future. It would be nice if everyone could get along and play well, in that case we would not need any war. That’s just not the reality in the real world. There are many positives aspects of war, such as mass employment opportunities, also an economy usually gets better after a war. When a country is going to declare war, it must be sure it used all other resources to try and reason with the opposing country before a declaration is made. Many companies also have the ability to profit from wars.…

    • 842 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is Patriotism A Virtue

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A nation goes to war to protect its people or to acquire resources. No matter the reason, war is arguably to benefit the people of a nation, or at least a faction within the nation. War is cloaked in patriotism. It is cast as the ultimate manifestation of one’s patriotism, the price to demonstratively prove patriotism to one’s country. Since the modality of war is to harm others through violence, and since harming others is not a virtue, war can never be considered virtuous.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is War Inevitable?

    • 3317 Words
    • 14 Pages

    We have known violence since the story of Cain killing Habile, however war came later. Is war in the nature of human beings or did it come along with evolution? Many of the ancient cultures that still live till now know no violence and no concept of warfare. War became crucial in our lives because of our ancestors and the state of development they knew. The stories and the myth of our elders influenced our vision of war. Idan Barir wrote:” I’d grown up with images of the glorious fighting of 1967 and wanted to be like those great Israeli heroes who had entered the old city of Jerusalem.” (Par.1)Moreover, the culture inherited by warfare is mostly destructive and repulsive. There is no place for an open mind you have to execute the orders or it is your life and the life of your companions that is at stake, “We were trained to believe that every Palestinian was a threat.”(Barir, par.3) Even patriotism one of the great values derived from the martial institution can be poisoned in times of war. Barir wrote:” Every morning we’d have a meeting on a big porch overlooking Tel Aviv. My commander would point out across the land trying to make us believe that this was the land we were defending.”(par.5) In that time the Israeli army where conducting raids in Jenin and were not under attack that is why there was nothing to defend! Furthermore, war creates discrimination and hatred against the rival even if the other was pacifist and had nothing to do with war he will be hated. For example Barir stated that when he was in Jenin many Israeli women were protesting for peace and commander made joke implying that it is easier to deal with Palestinian if they bother you “you can shoot them in the head.”When there is a war it is like life has no value anymore; the concepts of bravery, honor and valor that once…

    • 3317 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is seen as the epitome of evil due to its immense destruction of life buit can leave many countries in ruin, and a large stain in our history books. But even though we ourselves have seen the horrors of war and what it can do, but however in extreme cases it is necessary to engage in war if the cause is deemed just. In more recent times, there have been new debates as to whether or not the fight against terrorism is warranted. For example, America’s fight against the Taliban and Al Qaeda in the 2000’s has killed many civilians and erupted civil unrest in the Middle East making the situation much more explosive. Some may argue that under no circumstances is war justified and argue that pacifism should be the option that all countries should…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is defined for some as an armed conflict between two nations over a disputed situation, and is needed when there is nothing else that can be done. A natural occurrence that repeats it's self through out time. While others feel that war is an unnecessary dispute, that leads to nothing but destruction, and that there are always other solutions that can be made; that peace should come before all else.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 2632 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Westmoreland-White, M. L. (n.d). Internal Weaknesses of Just War Theory. Retrieved May 04, 2015, from Levellers: https://levellers.wordpress.com/2006/08/20/internal-weaknesses-of-just-war-theory/…

    • 2632 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Principles of War

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In view of the fact that in every action there is a reaction and that a chain of reactions would result into a more complicated outcome, war is just the product of the whole thing. Literally, leaders of the wars were gaining different techniques, strategies, and advances in technologies, yet, I would rather point out that their standard and principles of war wasn’t changed at all. Even with its breakthroughs and advances in science that give rise on its reputation, still, in my point of view and regardless to the influences and threats they were heaving up, it is on a certain aspect on which the ignition of the war started up. It all rooted in human’s fragile emotions such as greed, hatred, egocentric mechanism, dissatisfaction and superiority. Their motivation to keep going is as intense as the ‘eagle’s claws’ by which in every hold there is certainty and precise movements to achieve their direct advantage. Such actions of course results into a terrifying effect by which human race pays the consequences.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays