Preview

Milton Friedman, “the Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Profits”

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1188 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Milton Friedman, “the Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Profits”
Milton Friedman, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits”

In the article, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Profits,” Friedman states that “businessmen believe that they are defending free enterprise when they proclaim that business is not concerned merely with profit but also with promoting desirable social ends.” This social responsibility is defined as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which is the belief that “corporations owe a greater duty to their communities and stakeholders” by having a “social conscience.” This, among other things, includes being environmentally responsible, contributing to non-profit organizations, and eliminating discrimination.
Friedman argues that "only people can have responsibilities" but that "businesses as a whole” cannot, as they are not persons. Since the corporate executive is an employee of the shareholders, and therefore only “responsible to his employers.” The corporate executive has primary responsibility to his employers to conduct business as they see fit, and manage the business to create the most profit while following the “basic rules of the society”. It is then seen that the corporate executive is acting as a “public employee,” while serving shareholders and should be directed by those shareholders how to spend their money.
However, Friedman acknowledges that managers of corporations, while serving shareholders, are also people in their own right and may have their own social responsibilities that do not always follow those of the owners of the corporation. In that case, if the manager chooses to act based on his own beliefs instead of the direction of the shareholders, he is not performing in the best interests of the shareholders and is "spending the customers ' money." This has a direct financial impact to both customer and employees. This can lead to the managers’ termination as he has not performed as directed by the shareholders by not making as much

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Promoting a social justice may be justified, because it has been proven to create the competitive advantage by creating loyal employees, which directly leads to attaining loyal costumers. This may create an argument on flip side, that it may increase the administrative expenses which may also distracts the executive, as well as managers from their soul responsibility looking to increase the profits. This idea of profit maximization is well supported by the greatly Friedman, who particularly rejected the idea off business leaders articulating new visions that consider any business aspect than the profit maximizations them selves. The survey of corporate social responsibility research says, “ It creates administrative expenses, distracts executives, confuses economic goal, and subtracts from social welfare when the corporation is less efficient.” (The good company, 22)…

    • 2712 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freeman and Friedman have very contrasting opinions on the goals and responsibilities of a business. Freeman supports the Stakeholder Theory in suggesting that anyone who has a stake in the firm deserves to be treated as a participating determining factor in the direction of a firm. They are not just a means to the end. Friedman pretty much says the opposite. He believes that businesses have no responsibility outside of those who have ownership in the company. In devising my own opinion, being part of the Millennial generation I feel that we lean more towards Freeman’s argument.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to make justification for the type of behaviours business managers have and to outline the appropriate actions they should take, many ethical theories have been developed since. There are three that best represent the key perspectives in this matter; Friedman’s Shareholder theory, Freeman’s Stakeholder theory and Heath’s Market Failure Model of business ethics (Heath). Each of them is the pillars of which many other theories are based on but have very different and opposite views. The Shareholder theory suggests that manager has fiduciary duties to the shareholders only and must maximize profits as long as the law permits. The Stakeholder theory on the other hand suggests that managers have fiduciary duties to all stakeholders whom are positively or negatively affected by the…

    • 2229 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milton Friedman argued that a business’s only goal is to generate shareholder profit. This is stated in the very title of a New York Times article written by Milton Friedman, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”. This statement would no doubt start a myriad of discussions with in the business world. Why would Friedman take this type of right wing stand? Shouldn’t a company consider social issues in their everyday business as well?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milton Friedman’s article on how the entire value of the organisation belongs to the shareholders and the organisation is nothing but a ‘mere legal fiction’ was a revolutionary idea. If it wasn’t for Milton’s stature and reputation it would have been bombarded as an insane idea and would have been forgotten on the day itself. But, instead it went on to become one of the guiding principles for owners of the private firms, other stock holders and even the executives. Was the article instrumental in changing the Ethical rules of the entire world’s organisational perception? Well, the evidence in inclined towards it.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freeman vs Friedman

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Milton Friedman’s article went into grave detail the social responsibilities of an individual vs. the social responsibilities of a business. He also explained the duties of the businessman: legislator, executive, and the jurist. He couldn’t understand how some businessman could be so “clear headed” regarding matters internal to their business but so “muddle headed” in matters outside their business in matters critical to their business’s survival. According to Friedman, there is one social responsibility for a business “engage in open and free competition without deception or fraud.” My personal reaction to this article was that it was very difficult to read and comprehend. I had to reread the article and several sections of it several times to figure out what Friedman was trying to convey. I agree with Friedman’s one social responsibility for a business. However, when compared to Freeman’s article, his message was much clearer and defined better than…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thirty-five years ago, Milton Friedman wrote a famous article for The New York Times Magazine whose title aptly summed up its main point: "The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits." Friedman had no patience for capitalists who claimed that "business is not concerned 'merely' with profit but also with promoting desirable 'social' ends; that business has a 'social conscience' and takes seriously its responsibilities for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the catchwords of the contemporary crop of reformers." Friedman wrote that such people are "preaching pure and unadulterated socialism. Businessmen who talk this way are unwitting puppets of the intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free society these past decades."…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Do you agree or disagree with Friedman's position? Why? What is most positive about his position? What is most negative about his position? This was written in 1970, does it apply in today's global/high tech economy? Why or why not?…

    • 3212 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    guide reading

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Friedman argues that the objective of a corporation is to maximize the profits within the guidelines of the law in the free and open society. If the corporate executive has a “social responsibility”, which means his is to act that is not in the interest of his employers.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Milton Friedman, the developer of the Stockholder theory, stated, “there is one and only one social responsibility of business—to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it says within the rules of game, which is to say, engage in open and free competition without deception and fraud. ” (Friedman 69). He separated the idea of business ethics into business decisions and ethical decisions, two concepts that could be explained independently. As defined by Friedman, the stockholders are the people who own a share of the stock, and only they have a moral claim on the corporation. The stockholder also means the founders of the corporation. In addition, the managers are only the agents of the individuals who own the corporation, and must carry out their duty towards the company’s stockholders by maximizing profits in their business decisions. Friedman stated the ethical regulations that are imposed by law were constraints to managers. From businesses’ point of view, managers should pursue profit maximization regardless of the ethicality of the decision. So when faced with the choice between an environmentally friendly but low margin product and one with a high margin…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Economist Milton Friedman argues that a business’ “responsibility…generally will be to make as much money as possible”. Friedman clearly argues against the belief that a business has a moral duty to its consumers and rathers that their responsibility is instead to its shareholders, and therefore act in their best interests. Thus, Friedman would argue in the Ford Pinto case, in which Ford decided to risk consumer’s health over recalling the Pinto model, costing shareholders profit revenue, that Ford had no moral duty to recall the car as it had no moral duty to its consumers.…

    • 323 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Milton Friedman and others have argued that a corporation 's purpose is to maximize returns to its shareholders, and that since only people can have social responsibilities, corporations are only responsible to their shareholders and not to society as a whole. They assert that corporations have no other obligation to society. (Freeman,…

    • 2769 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Ethics 101 Week 1

    • 4442 Words
    • 18 Pages

    • ‘The one and only social responsibility of business is to make profits’ (the economics guru Milton Friedman)…

    • 4442 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We could firstly look at the arguments that would justify a company in putting its first loyalty and moral responsibility to its owners as a priority. One of those arguments is the shareholder theory, which states that “the primary responsibility of a firm is to maximise the wealth of its shareholders” (Friedman, 1962). As Friedman (1970 in Moore 1999) then proceeded to argue, he claimed that society would gain as a whole if businesses were left to do what they do best, create wealth.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you are the sole owner of a business, you make the decisions that affect your own well-being. But what if you are a financial manager of a business and you are not the sole owner? In this case, you are making decisions for owners other than yourself; you, the financial manager, are an agent. An agent is a person who acts for—and exerts powers of—another person or group of persons. The person the agent represents is referred to as the principal. The relationship between the agent and his or her principal is an agency relationship. In an agency relationship, the agent is charged with the responsibility of acting for the principal. Is it possible the agent may not act in the best interest of the principal, but instead act in his or her own self-interest? Yes—because the agent has his or her own objective of maximizing personal wealth. In a large corporation, for example, the managers may enjoy many fringe benefits, such as golf club memberships, access to private jets, and company cars. These benefits (also called perquisites or perks) may be useful in conducting business and may help attract or retain management personnel, but there is room for abuse. What if the managers start spending more time at the golf course than at their desks? What if they use the company jets for personal travel? What if they buy company cars for their teenagers to drive? The abuse of perquisites imposes costs on the company—and ultimately on the owners of the company. There is also a possibility that managers who feel secure in their positions may not bother to expend their best efforts toward the business. This is referred to as shirking, and it too imposes a cost to the company.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays