Preview

Missouri Compromise of 1820

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2678 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Missouri Compromise of 1820
The Missouri Compromise of 1820

In November of 1818, Missouri petitioned Congress for statehood and ignited a controversy over slavery and a balance of power in the Senate that would span two sessions of Congress and threaten the dissolution of the Union and a civil war. Prior to the Missouri question, the Union had eleven Free states and eleven slave states, each with two Senators. The Missouri Territory, carved out of land acquired in the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, covered an expanse of land just north of the Ohio River and just west of the Mississippi (these rivers joined in the southeastern corner of the territory). According to the terms of the Ordinance of 1787, which prohibited slavery in the Northwest Territory, the Missouri Territory was designated a free territory, but many of the settlers had brought their slaves with them when they settled the area and were determined to enter the Union as a slave state. With the growing abolitionist sentiment in the North and the South pressing to legalize slavery, permitting Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state would tilt the power of the Senate in favor of the South and make the realization of legalizing slavery more attainable. Since 1809, the issue of slavery had been relatively quiet, but Missouri’s request to enter the Union as a slave state just at the nation was beginning to expand westward, thrust the question of slavery back into the spotlight of national politics. A set of compromises, known as the Missouri Compromise of 1820, allowed Congress to avoid a resolution on the issue of slavery.

The Missouri question was the first slavery related political crisis of the 1800’s. It was an attempt to allow slavery in a state considered a free territory. Just after the American Revolution, Congress divided the land ceded by Great Britain in the 1783 Treaty of Paris, into free and slave regions. The Ordinance of 1787 permitted the introduction of slavery in the territory south of the Ohio River



Cited: Primary Sources Annals of 15th Congress Session 2. Vol.1. A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation. Library of Congress. n.d. Web. 17 October 2012. “Letter to John Holmes 20 April 1820”. Thomas Jefferson Exhibition. Library of Congress. August 3, 2010. Web. 17 October 2012. Secondary Sources Dixon, Susan B. The True History of the Missouri Compromise and its Repeal. Cincinnati: The Robert Clarke Company, 1899. Print Forner, Eric. Give Me Liberty! An American History. Vol. 1. 3rd ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2011. Print. Glover, Moore. The Missouri Controversy 1819-1821. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1966. Print Ransom, Roger, L. “A House Divided: American Slavery in the Antebellum Era.” American Slavery Ed. William Dudley. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2000. 83-91. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1820, Missouri was petitioning to become a slave state, however, the imbalance of power in the south was unthinkable. Henry Clay, Speaker of the House at that time, proposed what is known as the Missouri Compromise. It stated that any land north of the 36°30’ line would be considered “free” land. The compromise was meant to create a balance between slave…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was written in the year of 1820 on March 3rd and was also passed on the same day. This compromise approved Missouri to come to America as a slave state, but conserved the correspondence between the North and the South by modeling the land of Maine out of Massachusetts and stopping slavery from territories accomplished in the Louisiana Purchase which is the north of the line of 36 30’ and this is the southern boundary of Missouri. The South and the North was not satisfied with the Missouri Compromise because many southern congressmen balloted to oppose the compromise. They opposed it because the limit on future slavery in the territories was not excessively abusive to the slave owners. It was abusive to them because the…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first debate over the issue of territorial expansion began when Missouri wanted to join the union as a slave state. Missouri, which was part of the Louisiana Purchase, which was part of the Northwest Ordinance. The Northwest Ordinance stopped slavery in the Northwest Territories. In 1817, when Missouri applied to the Union as a slave state, the issue of anti-slavery vs. pro slavery came up. In 1819, Maine applied to become a free state. A compromise was then reached, so that Maine would enter as a free state, while Missouri would enter as a slave state, balancing free and slave states. New territories that would enter above the 36’30’ line had to be free…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an effort by the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives to maintain a balance of power between the slaveholding states and Free states. The slaveholding states feared that if they became outnumbered in Congressional representation that they would lack the power to protect their interests in property and trade.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over slavery arose again after the Mexican-American War, when Congress had to decide the status of new territory acquired from Mexico. Although the Constitution gave Congress no ability to rid the nation of slavery, it allowed for Congress to determine the qualification future state's admission. This made it possible for a majority of either section to manipulate a new state's status through making the abolition or the protection of slavery necessary for the state to become organized. An earlier compromise in 1820, was the result of a struggle for sectional control over the status of Missouri. Congress choose to appease both sides by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The compromise created a westward line dividing the…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The terms of the Missouri Compromise comforted the sectional crisis, which was brewing over Missouri in 1819 during that period. Regardless of slave or free, the admission of Missouri would frustrate the balance of power that existed between these rival parties in the Council. Both side were temporary…

    • 684 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us History Began in 1607

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sage, Associate Professor Henry J. U.S. History I: United States History 1607-1865. Lorton, Virginia, June 2010.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first real crisis over territorial expansion took place in 1819-1821 over the admission of the state of Missouri. The proposed state of Missouri was the first (beside Louisiana itself) to be carved out of the Louisiana Purchase. It lay out of the jurisdiction of the Northwest Ordinance, which prohibited slavery in the Northwest Territories, and had a long tradition of slavery. Therefore, in 1817 Missouri applied to the Union as a slave state. The extension of slavery so far north and the threat of further expansion of slavery into all new territories of the U.S. created havoc in Congress. In February 1819, Congressman James Tallmadge, from New York, proposed an amendment that would prohibit any new slaves to enter the state and provided that all slave children born after the date of admission would be set free at the age of twenty-five. Tallmadge's gradual emancipation proviso received almost unanimous opposition from Southern Congressmen. The amendment twice passed the North dominated House of Representatives, only to be turned down by the balanced Senate. In December 1819, Maine applied for statehood as a free state. In the end a compromise was reached where Maine would enter the Union as a free state, Missouri would enter the Union as a slave state without restrictions, but in the remaining Louisiana territory slavery would be prohibited north of 36o30' (the Mason-Dixon Line). This is now known as the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise is commonly thought of the beginning of American Sectionalism, although signs were visible long before 1819.…

    • 781 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us History 1 Study Guide

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Missouri Compromise = A series of agreements passed by congress in 1820-1821 to maintain the balance of power between slave state and free states…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state, not daring to upset the balance between the total number of states with either stance. This law also forbade the extension of slavery into any area north of the 36°30′ latitude line in the…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1820 the new territory on Missouri applied for statehood, this was the spark that turned into a flame with the debate over slave vs Free states. This became known as the Missouri Compromise. It caused tensions because it was west of the Mississippi River and outside the boundaries of the Union. In order to keep the states balanced, Congress came to the decision of making Missouri a slave state and Maine a slave state.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the year 1820, congress passed a law called the “Missouri Compromise”. This law stated: any state below the border of Missouri that wanted to join the Union would be a slave state, and any state above the Missouri border would be a free state. The law also allowed anyone to cross either side of the border to capture African Americans and sell them back into slavery. When the Missouri Compromise was passed,there were three states above the border that were already slave states, and the law allowed those states to keep slavery. There were several reasons why the Missouri Compromise gave the South an advantage over the North.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The territorial expansion can be seen as splitting the nation apart when Missouri was added to the nation from 1819-1821. In 1817 Missouri applied to the Union as a slave state. The House of Representatives passed the Tallmadge amendment, twice, which stated that no more slaves should be brought into Missouri. The south was angered by the new amendment and saw it…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was a bad solution, because it did not solve the slave problem but it was also a good compromise because it lasted for several years and temporarily solved the conflict of whether or not the new states would be slave states or free states. Perhaps the more important aspect of the Missouri Compromise was the agreement that no territory to the north of Missouri’s southern border could enter the Union as a slave state. That part of the compromise effectively stopped slavery from spreading into the rest of the Louisiana Purchase. The Missouri Compromise, as the first great Congressional compromise over the slavery issue, was also important as it set a precedent that Congress could regulate slavery in new territories and states. While the Missouri Compromise seemed to settle an issue at the time, its full impact still lay years in the future. The issue of slavery was far from settled, and further compromises and Supreme Court decisions would play a role in the great debates over it. This was meant to settle the question of slavery in the Western territories that were applying to become states of the Union. It was agreed to draw one line of latitude, north of which slavery would be illegal. The line was the Southern border of Missouri. The compromise was made to make everyone happy, it wasn’t really about the slaves but about power. There were 11 slave and 11 free states and one more state was coming into play. If the state became a slave state then the South would have had more power in the House of Representatives, than the North. If the state became a free state then the South would be weak in the House of Representatives. No one in the government or in the North wanted the South to have more power because they were afraid the country would become a slave nation and they didn’t want that. The only way to make everyone happy was the Missouri Compromise, but it was not an ideal way to settle the dispute over the expansion of slavery in the…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exploring Constitutional Conflicts, "The Thirteenth Amendment: The Abolition of Slavery." Accessed March 3, 2013. http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/thirteenthamendment.html.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays