I will first begin by discussing the mode of conformity, this “occurs when individuals both embrace conventional social goals and also have the means at their disposal to attain them. The conformist desires wealth and success and can obtain them through education and a high-paying job. In a balanced, stable society, this is the most common social adaptation. If a majority of its people did not practice conformity, the society would cease to exist.”- Juvenile Delinquency. Conformity is simply a social influence that involves change in a belief or behavior in accordance with a specific group. It ultimately means that those within a group yield to the pressures of the rest of the group in order to conform to the majority.
A good example I found on conformity was the study performed by Jenness in 1932. He was “the first psychologist to study conformity. His experiment was an ambiguous situation involving a glass bottle filled with beans. He asked participants individually to estimate how many beans the bottle contained. Jenness then put the group in a room with the bottle, and asked them to provide a group estimate through discussion. Participants were then asked to estimate the number on their own again to find whether their initial estimates had altered based on the influence of the majority. Jenness then interviewed the participants individually again, and asked if they would like to change their original estimates, or stay with the groups estimate. Almost all changed their individual guesses to be closer to the group estimate.”-Simply Psychology.
Next is the mode of innovations, this “occurs when an individual accepts the goals of society but rejects or is incapable of attaining them through legitimate means. Many kids desire material goods and luxuries but lack the financial ability to attain them. The resulting conflict forces them to adopt innovative solutions to their dilemma; they steal, sell drugs, or extort money. Of the five adaptations, an innovation is most closely associated with delinquent behavior.”- Juvenile Delinquency. This mode is often associated with delinquent behavior because individuals are simply introducing new ways of attaining things they cannot have by illegal or creative means of doing so, because achieving them by any other means may appear or seem impossible or unavailable to them.
Next is the mode of ritualism, which is defined as individuals who are “less concerned about accumulating wealth and instead gain pleasure from practicing traditional ceremonies regardless of whether they have a real purpose or goal. The strict set of manners and customs in religious orders, clubs, and college fraternities encourage and appeal to ritualists.”- Juvenile Delinquency. In this mode Merton explained that people obey norms outwardly and go through the motions just as everyone else but lack commitment to their roles and values within the social system. Due to the lack of commitment and its effect on others it can undermine morale and commitments of others within the system and begin causing divisions in the system as a whole.
Next we will be discussing the mode of retreatism, which is a combination of both innovative and ritualistic deviance, and are individuals who “reject both the goals and the means of society. Merton suggests that people who adjust in this fashion are “in the society but not of it.” Included in this category are “psychotics, psychoneurotic, chronic autists, pariahs, outcasts, vagrants, vagabonds, tramps, chronic drunkards, and drug addicts.” Because such people are morally or otherwise incapable of using both legitimate and illegitimate means, they attempt to escape their lack of success by withdrawing- either mentally or physically.”- Juvenile Delinquency. Individuals who remain within this mode are considered to be there of their own free will vs. by force.
Lastly we will be discussing rebellion, which “involves substituting an alternative set of goals and means for conventional ones. Revolutionaries who wish to promote radical change in the existing social structure and who call for alternative lifestyles, goals, and beliefs are engaging in rebellion. Rebellion may be a reaction against a corrupt and hated government or an effort to create alternate opportunities and lifestyles with the existing system.”- Juvenile Delinquency. Other examples of rebellions would be terrorists or gangs. Each of these types of individuals are considered to be in a special category and reject both cultural means and society and the venues for obtaining them.
In conclusion we have discussed Merton’s modes of adaptation; which included conformity, innovations, ritualism, retreatism, & rebellion.
Reference:
Siegel, L. J., & Welsh, B. C. (2012). Juvenile delinquency, theory, practice, and law. (11 ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Pub Co.
McLeod, S. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/conformity.html
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Conformity is a social influence in which an individual changes their beliefs or behaviour in order to fit in with another individual or group. This fulfils the need to feel accepted and not outcast which can increase the individuals self esteem. Conformity can be demonstrated by a change in the individual’s clothes, language or attitude etc. to adapt to the group; thus displaying the desire to be a group member. It indicates to the group that ‘I am not a threat as I am like you and following your rules’. It gives the group a sense of security as the consistency of a conformists behaviour allows members to predict what each one will do. Members of a conformist group may…
- 2535 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays -
Merton argues that there are different ‘modes of adaptation’, or responses to situations, that range from conformity that most people to display, to one of four forms of deviance, which he calls Innovation, Ritualism, Retreatism and Rebellion. A non-deviant, non-criminal conformist citizen would take the conformity mode of adaptation where they accept the means and goals of society. However those who fail to do so often turn to crime as an alternative.…
- 577 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Conformity is a form of social influence and is the tendency to copy other people's behaviour and attitudes from within a group.…
- 348 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Conformity within a group entails members changing their attitudes and beliefs because of real or imagined social pressure in order to match those of others within the group. (Passer & Smith, 2003)…
- 932 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Conformity is common in the world, most people conform to whom they look up to. People can be courageous enough to stay the way they are or can lean into conforming. People conform the most at work or in school. At school people conform to be “normal” and at work, people conform to be official and disciplinary so there boss can like and trust them. I’m not saying conformity is bad.…
- 585 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
People who conform are happy and are given a sense of identity, those who don't are left to be alone…
- 1812 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The concept of conformity is changing the way you think or act based on the influences around you. Religion in my opinion is an example of conformity. It’s not the belief in God that I think people conform to, it’s the way they perceive God or the beliefs that…
- 771 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
It is a type of social influence involving a change in belief or behavior in order to fit in with a group. This change is in response to real (involving the physical presence of others) or imagined (involving the pressure of social norms / expectations) group pressure.…
- 445 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Social Influence what is conformity? Conformity is a type of social influence involving a change in belief or behavior in order to fit in with a group. We feel the pressure of those people around us, This change is in response to real or imagined group pressure.…
- 346 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“We are half ruined by conformity, but we should be wholly ruined without it.” - Charles Dudley Warner. We have created this boundary between conformity and individualism and often times these traits get abused, thus creating someone who is too individualistic or a society that is too conformed. Individuality and conformity are both essential parts of society however, if one is held above the other in the wrong manner we could be dealing with people lashing out in inhumane ways or people not being able to think for themselves. In order to have a functioning society we need to find the perfect balance between conforming with your peers and having individual thoughts and actions.…
- 578 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Conformity is the convergence of individuals’ thoughts, feelings, or behavior toward social norms. One of the most influential conformity researchers in psychological history is Muzafer Sherif, who researched the reason why people conform. Conformity can occur for two different reasons, such as, informational influence and normative influence. Normative influence is when people want to be liked and so by being in a group they gain social approval that leads to compliance. On the other hand, informational influence is when people want to be right, so they join a group that they perceive to be correct, which leads to acceptance.…
- 761 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A norm is a set of rules based on socially or culturally shared beliefs of how an individual is “supposed to” behave. They regulate behaviour within a group. Conforming to group norms results in a positive and valued social identity and we receive the desired respect from others. Conformity is an indirect form of social influence that involves a change in behaviour in order to fit in with a group. The need to belong plays a strong role in the desire to conform to group norms.…
- 896 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Imagine the following situation: you are in a classroom and the teacher has asked the class a question. You have got one answer to the question, but you see majority of the students raising their hands for a different answer to the same question. What would you do? Would you go along with your own answer or would you change your mind and go along with the majority thinking that if majority of the people have the same answer then the answer must be correct? Most of the people would change their minds and follow the majority. In psychology, conformity is defined as the tendency to change our perceptions, opinions, or behavior in ways that are consistent with group norms (Brehm, Kassin, and, Fein 213), also simply known as “following the crowd”.…
- 1351 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Conformity is a form of social influence that involves you to change your beliefs to fit in with a group. This change is due to the physical presence of the group members, or imagined group pressure that involves the pressures of social norms. In the public services compliance with common practices is following a particular course of action which is the social norm. It can be seen when the police are dealing with suspects as the suspect is innocent until proven guilty and the law should not be taken upon in one person’s hands. Social Norms can be as common as being polite by saying sorry in certain situations.…
- 917 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1936 some of the first studies were carried out on this concept of conformity by Muzafer Sherif. In these studies Sherif made use of a phenomenon known as the auto-kinetic effect, whereby a point of light in an otherwise totally dark room will appear to move randomly. In the first experimental condition, subjects were invited to estimate the amount of movement' they observed. When the subjects were asked individually a huge range of answers were given. Sherif recorded each subject's response. In the second experimental condition, Sherif gathered the subjects into groups, usually of three, and asked them to describe verbally the movement of the light. No instruction was given that they had to reach some kind of agreement, the subjects were simply aware of the other's results whilst calling out theirs. During the group sessions it became apparent that the subjects' reports started to converge much nearer an average. The results of this groundbreaking study were, and still are, remarkable. But it was not without its flaws. A harsh critic of Sherif's experiment was Solomon Asch, who argued that it showed little about conformity since there was no right answer to conform to.…
- 1372 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays