Preview

Given Orders, Soldiers Destroy Civilians’ Homes and Kill Despite the Fact That These Acts Are Immoral and Brutal. Explain These Behaviors Based on Your Understanding of Conformity and Obedience.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
932 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Given Orders, Soldiers Destroy Civilians’ Homes and Kill Despite the Fact That These Acts Are Immoral and Brutal. Explain These Behaviors Based on Your Understanding of Conformity and Obedience.
During any war, many acts of brutality were committed by soldiers on both sides; and most people seem to realize this. Nevertheless, when we look at photographs of the dead women and children from any massacre, it seems impossible to understand how soldiers could participate in such an atrocity. However, in psychological views, we can easily explain their behavior by using conformity and obedience.

Conformity within a group entails members changing their attitudes and beliefs because of real or imagined social pressure in order to match those of others within the group. (Passer & Smith, 2003)
In general, the more members in the group, the more psychologically bonded the group, and the more the group is in close proximity, the more powerful the conformity can be. During wartime, many soldiers are gathered together, they lived in the same place and trained together within a long period of time, so they must in close proximity and they easy conform to others due to their close relationship.
So, although killing another human being is an extraordinarily difficult thing to do, especially killing those innocent citizens, during wartime, soldier feels he is isolated if he doesn't kill, and if he can get others to share in the killing process, then killing can be even easier. And soldiers clearly know that if anyone of them fails to conform to the group’s needs, he would lose credibility with the rest of the group. To fight a lone battle is very dangerous and difficult to win, so they must unite together.
In addition, we also succumb to normative social influence, conforming to obtain the rewards that come from being accepted by other people while at the same time avoiding their rejection (Deutsch & Gerard, 1955), during wartime a nation permit its soldiers to use force in order to protect the community. This permission includes lethal force because this kind of killing is for the protection and continued survival of an entire community or society. So long as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The reason is, as Weschler states, “Such interethnic violence usually gets stoked by specific individuals’ intent on immediate political or material advantage, who then calls forth the legacies of earlier and previously unaddressed grievances. (Weschler 784)” The author emphasizes that violence is often fueled by few individuals’ greed of political power and material gains. Hence, when we judge the immoral crimes of war criminals, it would be too rash for us to simplify or generalize that each individual of the criminal group bears the guilt and the responsibility of the war crimes. However, we cannot ignore the fact that the actions of individuals are often influenced by the pressure and the expectations of…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The lieutenant bases his message on a strong identification “us vs them”. A social comparison between the army and the rebels based on stereotypes underlining the negative element of the other to promote prejudice, and to induce, as analyzed in Chapter I, to polarization. Besides this reinforcement of attitude, as emerged in the analysis of “A class divided” experiment (PBS, 1985), in the Lieutenant speech there is the presence of moral justification for violent actions based on the attribution of errors and blaming the victim in the first place: “They have lost everything that makes them human. They do not deserve to live. This is why we must kill every single one of them.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were used to simple rules followed by society, knowing that killing is bad, your not allowed to drink alcohol under 21, and simply how to stop at a stoplight. Your morality is twisted and turned by the effects of war as killing once may have been bad in society but when you're faced against the dilemma that it's either “kill or be killed” the soldiers thoughts and emotions change drastically in that moment and forever. In society it's a rare moment to even come close to dying on a daily basis, whereas these soldiers are faced with almost dying every day instantaneously, they change because the set of rules they may have been used to following have changed. Killing may have been bad but now they are forced to survive without even taking a second thought to as if what they are doing is bad. If they had the moment to think about it in their thoughts they would be thinking about how the people they are killing may have families, be somebody's son/daughter, somebody's brother, somebody's lover,etc. If they were not forced to do this their morality and emotions wouldn't let most of them be able to do…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of war brings up many questions about life and death, suffering, and consequences. While many people may see war as something that affects people as a whole, such as nations or a persecuted group, war further impacts every individual, whether or not they are directly involved. War limits freedoms and individualism, and in most cases people find themselves with less rights than during peacetime. People base their choices not on what they feel, and more on what they have to do to survive. Soldiers and civilians alike are influenced by war in different ways, however, these tie together when the overall effects of war are examined.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Demagogic leaders allow for unjust situations to occur, which cause unbalanced tactics. Inadequate strategy generates situations to become difficult to control, and creates a chaotic region. Disorder in the camps allow soldiers to be irrational and unreasonable where one cares more about their rank rather than their morals. Soldiers in this state “allow [themselves] to be persuaded, otherwise [they] would have been ostracized” (Remarque 11). This exemplifies how soldiers’ appearances start to exceed the importance of their achievements .…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The shear resistance to killing an enemy combatant has been known to be so strong that individuals fail to fire before they themselves are killed. Grossman recognizes “The Milgram Factors” as the influential variables that push individuals to kill. These three variables are the demands of authority, group absolution, and the distance from the victim. The demands of the authority push soldiers to fire even when they don’t want to, in a way it allows the soldier to place the blame of killing on the authority figure as they ordered the killing. For this to work, four sub-factors must be met, these factors consist of, proximity of the authority, the respect had for the authority, the intensity of their demands, and the legitimacy of the authority.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hunting, murder, and war are all words men have made to distinguish between types of killing and the varied justifications made for committing the same deed. In carrying out this most grave and final of all endeavors, as any other action, one sees it is not the actual temporal action itself that matters and defines the moment. The intention with which one sets out is even more important than what is done, and determines, at least within the actor’s mind, the righteousness of the act. G.E.M. Anscombe’s “War and Murder” provides the baseline definitions of how to categorize killing during a time of war. These views are supplemented by fictional works in which death and its cause play a central role. Richard Connell’s…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s infamous 1963 study into the nature of obedience is often portrayed in the media as strong evidence for an innate human predisposition to obedience, “resistance is futile” (Parker, 2007) when it comes to the human condition to obey – even in a “destructive” (Milgram, 1963) sense. As Milgram (1963) himself states, obedience as a concept is one of the most fundamental aspects of society, and much has frequently been made of drawing parallels with the atrocities carried out by the Third Reich and the data produced by Milgram’s obedience studies [most notably the dramatic results of the baseline study (Haslam, 2012)]. The ideation is frequently asserted that Nazis themselves were displaying blind obedience (Debattista, 2012) to their superiors, and this blind obedience is what is captured in Milgram’s 1963 experiment, although this proposition must be questioned in lieu of a scientific analysis of Milgram’s actual works,…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individual actions are to support the goal of protecting the United States as a whole. A soldier who qualifies as an expert with the M-4 rifle is an example of virtue theory. The excellence of this soldier will increase the effectiveness of the team or company similar to utilitarianism. Obeying a direct order is part of the foundation of the Army. Shooting to kill in combat can go against an individual’s morals and ethics but deontology states duty is the primary factor regardless of individual belief.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the tests of time men and women across the world have shown they really are in times of conflict. In times where the true character of a person is really put to the limit, people are able to see who they really are. These conflicts can serve to reveal unexpected qualities in an individual. Times of conflict can suddenly expose a person’s true moral fibre and the courage of their convictions. A number of people may shy away from their personal qualities, and do their best not to big note themselves, however for some, in times of strong divergence between people or even countries, a persons ability to reason with their counterpart and show elements of compromise and understanding can all of a sudden come to the fore. Conflict can inadvertently result in the discovery of a person’s true beliefs, and their ability to express them with no fear of their opposition’s retaliation. The quality to stand up for what you believe in can reveal itself in these times of disagreement, just like when Martin Luther proclaimed that he ‘Had a Dream’, he went against the grain of society and discovered his enormous will and determination to rise up for what he stands for. However these qualities are not always positive ones, and can emerge from the most brutal of circumstances. The willingness to take a fellow humans life is especially evident in times of war and terror, revealing vicious and unruly qualities in some individuals. The late Osama bin Laden has been notorious for displaying these qualities, perplexing the world at the extent of his inhumane behaviour in instances of…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is one of humanity’s oldest vices. The keystone elements in human history are how soldiers respond to armed conflict and the stress of the war. The harsh conditions of war puts serious pressure on soldiers. Fighting a war is not a typical job that most of us go through. The soldiers are putting a very high risk to their own life and that is the biggest factor causing stress. They are not aware if the next bullet has their name of it. The knowledge and guilt of killing someone is not the same as watching a war movie with gory details on TV. It takes a lot of mental strength do it every day as part of your job and still move on. The expectations of the nation and family are high. They carry the expectations of many on their shoulders and do not want to face defeat at any cost. The loneliness and isolation from staying alone for months together away from family at war. The harsh living conditions for soldiers at war has deep impact on…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dear America

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Contention: That soldiers’ justify their actions and regain a sense of themself when seeking to dissolve their guilt in war.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soldiers Mindset

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thinking about soldiers we feel gratitude and pride because they fought to defend our lands and integrity, while Galef's interpretation compares the soldiers with people who act without thinking outside of their realities. Taking into consideration the civilization's history, the world dictators were the ones who started the wars and were not flexible enough to look over their own ambitions and were commanding over the soldiers to fight for their own reasons. At those times, this was the way to defend their points, while nowadays people try to avoid the violent acts and opt for rethinking, discussing and analyzing all ideas and…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are taught that it is never morally acceptable to kill another person regardless of our reasoning of wanting to do it. Killing is deemed unethical. There are few situations where society might think it is morally acceptable to kill others, being at War is one of them. If a person is approaching a soldier, and doesn’t comply with orders to surrender they are killed with no questions asked. There are many bad guys who use innocent people, that are brainwashed into thinking they are…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics