Preview

Is It Morally Permissible To Kill One Innocent Person Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
658 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is It Morally Permissible To Kill One Innocent Person Essay
I think there are few cases where it is morally permissible to kill one innocent person in order to save other innocent people’s lives. In the case of War, the soldiers are trained to kill people that they think are dangerous to others regardless, if they are innocent or dangerous. They do this to protect other people’s lives that is their job. Another reason would be if you were forced into a life or death situation and you could sacrifice one life to save other lives. We are taught that it is never morally acceptable to kill another person regardless of our reasoning of wanting to do it. Killing is deemed unethical. There are few situations where society might think it is morally acceptable to kill others, being at War is one of them. If a person is approaching a soldier, and doesn’t comply with orders to surrender they are killed with no questions asked. There are many bad guys who use innocent people, that are brainwashed into thinking they are …show more content…
(Debatepedia) In this case killing one innocent person would be morally good because it would result with saving a greater amount of people. The action of killing would be acceptable to society, according to Utilitarianism. However, according to the Deontological Ethics debate this action is not justified because killing just one person goes against all moral classes that killing is wrong. (Debatepedia)
If the killing isn’t for protection against a bigger evil, I don’t think it is permissible to kill However, if I had to choose to kill one person in my family to save the rest, there is no way in my mind that I would think that this is morally permissible. Even if it were the only way to save myself, I wouldn’t want to do it because I know it is wrong. The consequence for not killing them would end in death of all of my family members, and that would be considered the morally right thing to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    because no innocent person deserves to die and whether other people like the government, did…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PHL 292 - Exam 1 Study Guide

    • 2595 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Understanding what the wrong-making feature of killing is helps to understand why those who are opposed to abortion may think certain (consensual) mercy-killings are morally acceptable.…

    • 2595 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are some moments when killing can be justified, though it rarely is. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell the two main characters have the same mentality but different point of views on killing. Sanger Rainsford is an intelligent, professional “Big Game Hunter” that hunts a large variety of animals. General Zaroff is a sociopathic “Dangerous Game Hunter” that finds great interest in hunting human beings. In this story, Sanger Rainsford hunted animals which was proven rationalized where as General Zaroff hunted humans which was proven unjustified.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to understand if killing someone is justifiable you need to put yourself in someone’s situation. Imagine you’re in a car accident with your best friend, and she’s injured severely. In this moment, she knows she’s dying an uncomfortable death, your friend tells you to end their pain. As she takes possibly her last gasps of air, you have a decision to make, end or keep her life as this is a 50/50 chance situation. This would be one example of a justifiable act, along with situations such as war ethics, hunting for sport, and in the case of George and Lennie.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is killing justified? When is killing justified? Killing is justified because some people do things to get the death penalty. In the book (Of Mice and Men John Steinbeck) there are these 2 characters who get this job in California and the big guy, Lennie, kills the boss's son’s (Curley) wife. So George, went to find him and he shot Lennie because he killed Curley’s wife and it was either he kill Lennie or Curley and the others.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It will never be acceptable to kill innocent people, yet it happens all too often. In the American television series Dexter, the main character of the same name lives to satisfy his father 's "code" by killing terrible criminals who deserve death for continuing to get away with murder. Dexter executes the guilty with precision and with assurance that they deserve it. Throughout the episodes, this piece of literature argues that only those truly guilty of malicious crimes towards society deserve a just death (Dexter). Our country claims that capital punishment is justifiable because they claim to only kill those truly guilty of crimes. Nothing is more extreme than taking a life, so it is important…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a very thin line drawn in the debate whether or not death to another person is ever justifiable. There are so many different cases where I have a double sided opinion. I ultimately think that reasons for death such as euthanasia, abortion, acting in self-defense, etc. really depend on the circumstances of the situation. Webster’s dictionary defined murder as "the unlawful killing of another human being, especially with premeditated malice." What exactly is justifiable killing? Is abortion Okay? What about euthanasia, self-defense, war, or capital punishment? No I am not a believer in war, abortion nor do I think that taking another’s life is the absolute best decision. However if someone is putting your life or your loved ones life at harm, is that a reasonable clause, to use self-defense to protect your own life? I do believe it can be justified, but not always justifiable.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, I think that it does not matter whether a person kills another of thousands. The…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example in the 9/11 attacks in New York City. The terrorists that devised this plan had no intention on helping to preserve life, but were rather looking to release anger that they had towards the United States. Because of this, thousands of people died and millions to trillions of people were shaken up by the attacks. They were looking to kill as many people as possible for the sake of their belief that the United States is evil. They must have known in their mind that killing thousands of innocent people was wrong, just like beating someone who the boys in The Lord of the Flies never truly knew who they were harming. This is just one of many examples were human lives taken were just a number to some people and not taken into account for what they really…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you think about mercy killing, also known as compassionate homicide, you think about the act of painlessly allowing to die, to avoid extreme measures of pain and suffering. Mercy killing is demonstrated thoroughly throughout John Steinbeck's novel Of Mice And Men. Mercy killing can be argued whether or not it is right or wrong, and/or justifiable, as demonstrated throughout the novel Of Mice And Men. In current society Mercy Killing is considered politically incorrect, although many people agree it is a necassary step to save one from extreme pain and suffering.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Physician Assisted Sucide

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My Respond: I cannot imagine myself taking someone life because I am a very strong believer in God, but in life in general that I believe that when God is ready for us to die, we die. So my argument is that we should take someone life.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Minima

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first moral dilemma, murder or genocide. Murder is the unlawful killing with the malice aforethought, of another human and generally this state of mind distinguishes murder from other forms of unlawful homicide. To me, genocide is murder. Genocide is a mass murder of many people. To be capable of harming so many people, you would have to be a selfish and sick minded individual. As Goodman stated “Murder is wrong because it destroys a human subject” (Goodman, 2010, p.88)…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killing vs. Letting Die

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There's been quite a controversy in the topic of "killing" and "letting someone die". Just by the word "kill", many will say it's worse to kill a person, for example shooting them than allowing a person to die by say, not providing them with medicine. With this said, this just simply means that it it worse to harm a human being than letting harm happen to them. It's quite hard to weigh which is wrong or which is morally right. It really depends and varies on the situation we're talking about.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant Death Penalty

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As children we were always taught the golden rule; treat others the way you want to be treated. Immanuel Kant believes in the “eye for an eye” principle. What ever a person does, it should be affiliated to what that person deserves. Kant states, “Accordingly, any undeserved evil that you inflict on someone else among the people is one that you do to yourself” (481). What ever harm you are committing to others, you are committing to yourself with an example he has given, “if you kill him, you kill yourself” (481). To me, this conclusion is very reasonable because it is known that if you carry out a murder, the chances are you may be sentenced to death. Therefore you ARE killing yourself. Likewise, Ernest van den hag believes in the death penalty as well. More so that the fact that deterrence will make people more afraid of committing a murder. People fear death more than anything else in most cases which should bring the homicidal rates down.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    is killing ever justified

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are lots of arguments to say when killing is justified as in the case of a war. In World War II the Nazi’s attempting to kill all the Jews in the world was definitely not justified, but on the other hand the Allies killing was justified because they were trying to keep the Germans from taking over the world and because of this we live in the world we live today.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays