Preview

PHL 292 - Exam 1 Study Guide

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2595 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
PHL 292 - Exam 1 Study Guide
Exam 1: Study Guide

Thomson argues that a mother and child are (during pregnancy) not “two tenants in a rented house mistakenly rented to both” but rather the mother owns the house. The purpose of this analogy is to reveal that other parties cannot claim to be impartial when they claim they cannot decide who of the two (mother/child) should live.
True
False

Thomson’s famous “people-seed” analogy is intended to be an argument from analogy in support of which view?
All abortions are morally permissible
Only abortions of fetuses that are the product of rape may be aborted
In all cases of pregnancy, regardless of the circumstances, the rights of the fetus outweigh the mother’s rights
Some abortions are morally permissible

According to J. J. Thomson, author of ‘In Defense of Abortion’, the standard argument against abortion is invalid for the following reason:
The argument actually fails to make a logical transition from the personhood of a fetus to the impermissibility of abortion.
The conclusion is false, even though the argument succeeds to make a logical transition from the personhood of a fetus to the permissibility of abortion.
All the premises of the argument are in fact false.
No one has ever been actually persuaded by the argument.

Some other supporting considerations for Marquis’ view are:
Understanding what the wrong-making feature of killing is helps to understand why it is also wrong to kill animals.
Killing is always wrong, unless it is in self-defense.
Understanding what the wrong-making feature of killing is helps to understand why those who are opposed to abortion may think certain (consensual) mercy-killings are morally acceptable.
Human life is sacred.
Both a. and c.

According to Don Marquis, author of ‘The Immorality of Abortion’, the reason abortion is wrong is:
All human life is sacred.
It involves the intentional killing of a person, which is murder.
It is an instance of what is wrong with killing in general: it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The question between whether abortion is morally right or wrong has been talked about for years and no common ground has been made. Judith Thomson, a believer in Pro-choice, argues that abortion is not wrong because the mother should have a choice of what happens to her body. In response to this, Donald Marquis who is against abortion believes every fetus is a human with a right to have a future like ours. Each Ethicist gives examples and theories as to why abortion is wrong or right. In this essay, I will attempt to show that abortion is okay in some cases, and Donald Marquis’s views and arguments are broad and incorrect.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fallacies Analysis Prompt

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argument 1: Pro-abortion liberals are wrong to make ‘choice’ the ultimate issue. No one has absolute freedom of choice sanctioned by law. One can choose to rob a bank, or to kill their one-year-old child, but it is not legal. Why should a woman have the legal right to take the life of her unborn child?…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The title is somewhat misleading because it's not a complete defense of Abortion it's more of a minimal defense. In Thomson's essay, she states that Abortion is not necessarily morally impermissible which means that there are times when it is permissible and there are times when it is not. She begins the essay by pointing out that people debate on whether or not a fetus is a person. Many people feel that If we had an answer to that then that would make things a whole lot simpler and we would know that if a fetus was a person then it would be morally impermissible to go forth with an abortion and if the fetus wasn't a person that it would be morally permissible to have an abortion. For the sake of argument, she goes on to say that a fetus is a person and even though that may be the case there are still many scenarios in which abortion is morally permissible.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am going to assume “the human fetus has a right to life and if the human fetus has a right to life, then abortion is impermissible”, even though it can be challenged. I believe that Don Marquis has presented a strong argument in favor of the view that abortion is immoral. In fact, Marquis’ states in his premise one that “any being that can be deprived of a future like ours has a right to life”, the second premise is that “the human fetus has a future like ours”. Thus, Marquis’ conclusion is “the human fetus has…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomson Rebuttal

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Does a fetus have the right to the mother’s body? If a woman allows herself to engage in sexual relations, fully aware of the possibility of pregnancy, then the mother should indeed be responsible for the living fetus and should allow the fetus a right to her body. This argument is not valid in a case where sexual relations are forced upon a woman. However, this argument still holds the mother responsible for the fetus’s life even though the mother’s life may be at risk. Thomson’s response to this is that even though we could of potentially done something to avoid pregnancy, most people won’t want to accept responsibility.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    the right to terminate her pregnancy. In no case in its history has the Court declared that a fetus…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomson, though, concludes that reasoning in this way is misguided, or at very best is not complete. In light of this, she begins by conceding the problem of personhood to her opponent; she supposes, for purposes of argumentation, that the fetus is a man from the instant of conception. She tries to demonstrate that if this concession is made, abortion is permissible in several cases…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beck Vs Socrates

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Vivian: No it is not a violation, because the unborn fetus is a mass of cells that grows inside of the mother, it has no rights because it is not yet a human being. Once the baby is born, then they receive rights and are considered human beings.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is a massive moral debate over abortion in America and many other countries. Murdering human beings has been called severely immoral for a very long time. The arguments for abortion are not only if the fetus applies to this rule, but also our basic rights as humans. Some of the strongest arguments to date on either side are A Defense of Abortion by Judith Jarvis Thomson and Why Abortion is Immoral by Don Marquis. I will argue in defense of abortion using these arguments.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Thomson’s paper “A defense of Abortion,” she argues that abortion is morally permissible in some cases. Within the subject of abortion is the circular argument of if a fetus should be classified, and therefor given the same rights, as a person. One of the common opinions among lawmakers is that a fetus’s classification as a person begins at its viability. Others argue that a fetus is a person at the first sign of brain activity. There is no way to definitive answer so Thomson side steps this by assuming for the sake of argument that a fetus is a person and even such, there are cases where abortion should still be considered morally permissible. Thomson effectively argued or the moral permissibility…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    "An abortion is the deliberate killing of a human being. As such, it is a murder. When you kill an unborn child, you rob it of its whole future life. Therefore it is never morally permissible and it should be illegal." Critically assess that claim.…

    • 2505 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mary Anne Warren in On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion stated the characteristics which are central to the concept of personhood which are “sentience, emotionality, reason, the capacity to communicate, self awareness, and moral agency” (Cahn 193). In Warren’s requirements, adults are placed in the “persons” category. On the other hand, fetuses are not “persons” since fetuses do not abide to Warren’s characteristics. Fetuses therefore do not have the right to life. When a person has a “right,” it indicates that the person is justified to do something. For example in a legal stance, every United States citizen has the right to vote. Therefore no one can prevent a United States citizen from voting, since the citizen is justified to vote according to United States law. In a moral stance, since an adult has a right to life and not a fetus, my mother, technically if ever placed in a situation for choosing between my mother and a fetus, deserves to live not the fetus. In addition, a “fetus” is the zygote formed upon conception. The zygote is not a person. Even though the zygote will become an adult, at this point the zygote has no rights since the zygote does not fulfill Warren’s requirements. Therefore, abortion i¬s justified since the fetus is not a “person.”…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why abortion is immoral by Don Marquis is the start of two discussions pertaining to whether abortion should be acceptable in our modern society. The argument, Marquis makes, is that abortion actually deprives the fetus’s “future-like-ours.” Many philosophers support Marquis’ belief by arguing that fetuses have their own possibilities; thus, killing fetuses is absolutely wrong (Marquis, 105). Nevertheless, there are also other philosophers who criticize Marquis’ view in order to prove that abortion is not immoral since the fetus has no right to live. One of them is Peter K. McInerney, who wrote Does a Fetus Already Have a Future-Like-Ours? McInerney demonstrates the fact that fetuses have little or no relationship to their own future; therefore, the belief that “a fetus has a right to life” fails (Brill, 419). In addition, to support McInerney’s argument, H. Skott Brill’s The Future-Like-Ours Argument, Personal Identity and the Twinning Dilemma provides us ideas along with different perspectives on why McInerney’s theory is a strong account against Marquis’s point of view on abortion. On the other hand, Marquis’s Brill’s Objection to the Future of Value Argument criticizes the conflicts between Brill’s premises in order to prove that his initial belief to abortion is consistently right. In this paper, I will present Brill’s and Marquis’s principal arguments and how they support their point of view.…

    • 2214 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    the matter is whether the fetus is a living human. (2) The bottom line being, that the fetus's moral status…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abortion Is Always Wrong.

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many agree that abortion is wrong because you are playing God as you are taking the act upon who can live and who cannot. The fifth commandment is ‘You shall not kill’ and by killing an innocent unborn child you are no better than a murder. The Roman Catholic Church believes that life begins at conception and that it is unacceptable in all situations. Jeremiah 1:5- ‘Before I formed you in the womb I knew you’ killing something you already know would break the unique connection that a mother and their foetus have. The Church of England believe that a foetus is God-given life so should be protected, if you then kill the unborn child you do not respect God and therefore think you are better that him.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics