Preview

Jean Thomson Abortion Rhetorical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
602 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jean Thomson Abortion Rhetorical Analysis
The title is somewhat misleading because it's not a complete defense of Abortion it's more of a minimal defense. In Thomson's essay, she states that Abortion is not necessarily morally impermissible which means that there are times when it is permissible and there are times when it is not. She begins the essay by pointing out that people debate on whether or not a fetus is a person. Many people feel that If we had an answer to that then that would make things a whole lot simpler and we would know that if a fetus was a person then it would be morally impermissible to go forth with an abortion and if the fetus wasn't a person that it would be morally permissible to have an abortion. For the sake of argument, she goes on to say that a fetus is a person and even though that may be the case there are still many scenarios in which abortion is morally permissible. …show more content…
Thompson feels that its false. In her first thought experiment, she goes on talk about how one day you just wake up in the hospital with a famous violinist attached to your kidneys, and he needs the use of your kidneys for nine months. You have to keep in mind that every person has a right to life and so the violinist has a right to life so it would be impressionable to unplug the violinist. You also have a right to bodily integrity which trumps a right to life. This example shows us that there are some cases in which abortion is morally permissible. This analogy about a pregnancy that resulted from a
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Relationship Between Thompson's 'And Marquis' Argument
    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Relationship Between Thompson's 'And Marquis' Argument

    1 )The relationship between Thompson’s and Marquis’ arguments are very different, but I believe both are compatible with each other. They both take the personhood out of the question, so there is no debate on if the fetus is a human in the womb. Marquis discusses voluntary conception and Thompson does not really discuss that. Thompson’s conclusion deals more with the exceptional cases that Marquis doesn’t explain at all. Thompson weighs the rights of the individuals involved in the pregnancy like the mother and fetus against each other. Marquis, on the other hand, focuses on the concept of what makes killing wrong thus killing a fetus that could possibly have a future like ours is bad. His conclusion focuses on the rights of the victim in the mother/fetus situation. The mortality of the situation in both arguments deals with which person’s rights out ways the other’s. In Marquis, the fetus’ rights outweigh the mother’s rights. In Thompson’s argument, the mother’s rights can trump the fetus’ rights in certain circumstance.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    PHL 292 - Exam 1 Study Guide
    • 2595 Words
    • 11 Pages

    PHL 292 - Exam 1 Study Guide

    According to J. J. Thomson, author of ‘In Defense of Abortion’, the standard argument against abortion is invalid for the following reason:…

    • 2595 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Justin Trudau On Abortion Rhetorical Analysis
    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page

    Justin Trudau On Abortion Rhetorical Analysis

    Justin Trudeau’s interview from the National Post illustrates his contradictory views about abortion.The intention of the author is to show Trudeau’s opinion on abortion whether he will agree with is faith or his political party. It is effective, since he clearly explains his opinion and the liberal opinion saying“I am personally pro-life and have long held these beliefs,” and “The liberal party is the party of chart of rights and freedom.” Trudeau present’s how he keeps his point of view to himself however letting women have the choice of an abortion. Justin Trudeau should take a stand against abortion, in hope that*, it will make the murdering of children illegal. Justin Trudeau should not describe himself as two people, the real him…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomson Handout 1

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomson Handout 1

    The standard argument that Thomson is making I that a fetus is a human from the moment it is conceived. That people say to view how humans are made in which includes the process of conception that is said to be human then it must be true.…

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of David Brooks The Abortion Memo, By David Brooks
    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of David Brooks The Abortion Memo, By David Brooks

    “Without pro-life voters, Ronald Reagan never would have been elected. Without the single-issue voters…, there would never have been a President Donald Trump” (Brooks). David Brooks, author of “The Abortion Memo,” published in February 1, 2018, in the New York Times, argued that while Democrat leaders are prioritizing late-term abortions, Republicans who are pro-life are dominating in the United State more than Democrats. David Brooks had been known as the best political and cultural journalist. He spent his lifetime writing about the current political scenario and foreign affairs for many years. Brooks decided to write his article as an Imaginary Democratic Consultant, advising…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judith Thompson Abortion Analysis
    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judith Thompson Abortion Analysis

    The statement "defense of abortion", gives us an another view to a problem of abortion. Mostly, Judith Jarvis Thompson protects pro-choice side, and she says that abortion is not immoral, and that it is logically correct action. However there are a lot of anti-abortion philosophers who are not agree with it. So Judith Thompson gives an arguments to proof her sides correctness. She says that mother has all rights to do anything with her body and things in her body. Judith Jarvis Thompson also believes that fetuses are not persons, and killing them is not immoral. However she says that there are also situations, when abortion is incorrect. Also she gave 3 main thought experiments to get another point of view to abortion.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Lee Abortion Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Patrick Lee Abortion Rhetorical Analysis

    For decades the issue of abortion has drawn the attention of politicians and civilians alike, and regardless of any political or religious affiliation, every one has a static opinion, and neither side is backing down. The issue is the morality of safe and legal abortions for women. Coming to rise in the late 1970’s, abortion laws led to the creation of two strong groups; the pro-life party, fighting for the lives of future children, and the pro-choice party, fighting for the right for women to get abortions if they decide to. Pro-choice supporters have often been identified as feminists, working on behalf of women’s civil liberties; however, the pro-life feminist party, while still being…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Defense Of Abortion By Judith Jarvis Thomson
    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Defense Of Abortion By Judith Jarvis Thomson

    After reading “A defense of Abortion” by Judith Jarvis Thomson and what he had to say with his violinist analogy involving the kidney replacement. I agree with what he has to say on not only abortion itself but, whether or not a fetus should have the right to the women’s body. I don’t think that the fetus should be given the right to use the women’s body because what if she does not what to have a baby and ends up getting pregnant anyway. Also, each time a woman engages in sexual intercourse, she is not inviting the fetus to live inside her body. This is why birth control and other contraceptives are not a sure deal when dealing with sexual intercourse. What if the birth control method fails and the women end's up getting pregnant? She did…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mathewes-Green's 'When Abortion Suddenly Stopped Making Sense'
    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mathewes-Green's 'When Abortion Suddenly Stopped Making Sense'

    Abortion has always been a controversial topic in America. People have been separated into “pro life” and “pro choice” groups who support completely opposite topics. In “When Abortion Suddenly Stopped Making Sense”, Frederica Mathewes-Green successfully persuades readers why she is against abortion by utilizing personal anecdotes when switching from pro choice to pro life, alarming statistics and exposing a baby’s humanity using sympathetic language.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Don Marquis Abortion Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Don Marquis Abortion Rhetorical Analysis

    I am going to assume “the human fetus has a right to life and if the human fetus has a right to life, then abortion is impermissible”, even though it can be challenged. I believe that Don Marquis has presented a strong argument in favor of the view that abortion is immoral. In fact, Marquis’ states in his premise one that “any being that can be deprived of a future like ours has a right to life”, the second premise is that “the human fetus has a future like ours”. Thus, Marquis’ conclusion is “the human fetus has…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Marry Ann Warren View On Abortion
    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Marry Ann Warren View On Abortion

    Ultimately, she argues that the fetus are not human beings therefore, we should not worry about if we should be able to kill them. She states that the fetus is genetically human, but she claims that research has shown that a fetus is not morally a human. Genetically human is known as a member of the homo sapiens species and being morally human can be summed up by saying one that gives us traits that make us have moral rights. She compiles a list of attributes that make a human morally human: consciousness, reason, self-motivated activity, communication, and self-awareness (not necessarily all of them). She concludes that because the fetus is not morally a human until around the third trimester, so the fetus is not a human until that point, which makes an abortion acceptable any time before the third trimester, or around twenty or so weeks. However, she doesn’t agree with allowing the individual to have an abortion done after reaching the state where the fetus is morally…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abortion Rhetorical Analysis
    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page

    Abortion Rhetorical Analysis

    I don't agree with most of what the author says. When the author brings up abortion, they state "Liberals are so convinced that abortion is the best choice for women experiencing unexpected pregnancy..." Liberals are pro-choice, not pro-abortion. They want to respect the mother's decision, whether it is abortion or keeping the baby. Secondly, in the school choice paragraph, liberals want to fund the schools, for example, those in low-class neighborhoods, to prevent them from closing down and/or funding more classes. Still, the author did fail to provide credible sources to support their arguments, making their essay hard to stick by.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Marquis's Arguments Against Abortion
    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marquis's Arguments Against Abortion

    That a fetus has the right not to be killed unjustly, not not be killed, and the right to life, but not whatever it takes to sustain that life (such as in the example of the kidney donor), and this is an important distinction. This view protects the rights of the fetus, but also protects the rights and autonomy of the mother. Further, it recognizes that some rights are stronger than other rights, giving the mother the proper moral rights as not only a fully realized person, but one that would have to give the fetus life as well. Due to these reasons, I find Thompson’s argument as to why abortion is morally permissible the most…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomson Abortion
    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomson Abortion

    Johnson starts off by going back to history telling the audience Roe v. Wade was announced during the "Dark Ages" stating "In the ensuing decades, knowledge regarding the development of unborn humans, and their capacities at various stages of growth, has advanced in quantum leaps." (Johnson), putting an example of why doctors should administer anesthesia into an unborn child around twenty weeks of pregnancy. Thomson's article starts off by explaining the alteration between baby rights and mother's rights coming from her very own perspective. She begins with how a woman has the right to choose her own lifestyle and how they want to live as long as it does not take away someone else's right to live and jumping straight to facts explaining her reasons. A difference between Johnson's and Thomson's articles is that Thomson gives her own analogy for her choice and debate on abortion and describes it as "...someone waking up strapped to a famous, but unconscious violinist." (Thomson). She uses this analogy to give the audience a different and better view on abortion. Thomson also uses number of rebuttals on her arguments and debates after each one of her paragraphs from each content. The two articles contrast in using examples. Thompson brings out more examples and has a bigger argument with abortion and the…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Owning Up To Abortion Rhetorical Analysis
    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page

    Owning Up To Abortion Rhetorical Analysis

    A choice is a choice; it is as simple as that. Abortion is a huge controversial issue in the United States that many people disagree on. In the essay, “Owning up to Abortion” Ehrenreich believes that women should not keep in the dark about their abortion, but instead own up to it. Although abortion may be frowned upon by some people, no one should be entitled to judge another women because of their choice. No woman should feel ashamed of having an abortion because it is her choice and no one should make her feel like her choice is invalid.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics