As a producer of genetically modified seeds that lead to larger crop yields and eventually larger profits for farmers, Monsanto has a moral obligation to farmers who have grown crops and saved seeds for the next crop for hundreds of years before Monsanto began changing the genetic makeup of the seed. Farmers should not feel obligated to Monsanto as they have manipulated the future of farming through patent protection of intellectual property. Some thoughts should be discussed regarding Monsanto’s position; the comparison of seed manipulation as a form of technology, the use of patent protection, and the bullying of farmers through investigations of farmers reusing seeds from a previous harvest.…
While there are questions of Monsanto’s ethical practices, the success of producing genetically modified seeds is irrefutable. While GM seeds are profitable, the disputes that these seeds have the potential to harm plants and animals are ongoing. As previously stated Monsanto’s seeds are resistant to its own herbicide, Roundup. With this in mind, the seed’s composition includes the chemical glyphosate, an ingredient of Roundup. According to Scientific American (2009), glyphosate “amplifies the toxic effect on human cells—even at concentrations more much diluted than those used on farms and lawns”, and that other ingredients in Roundup may negatively impact pregnant women and their fetuses(Gammon). On the other hand, Monsanto contest the findings,…
Within Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele’s article “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear,” the reader receives information on the complicated history and questionable business tactics of the agriculture company Monsanto. Moreover, Barlett and Steele bring to light numerous counts of wrong doing committed by Monsanto by focusing on the legal actions and cases found in state and federal courts. Particular attention is focused on the vast resources and funds that Monsanto utilizes to deter smaller farmers and co-ops from continuing the cases in court, consequently, most of the cases are settled. Also, a great amount of space remains dedicated to a history lesson of the Monsanto company. Therefore, Monsanto has many ligations due to improper chemical…
Interest groups are defined as an “organized group of people that makes policy-related appeals” and they can have a profound effect on our government and society (Ginsberg, Lowi, and Weir 419).These groups represent their interests in the political arena in a variety of ways; they can get government officials appointed to government positions, lobby government officials, and fund media to advertise their message to mobilize public opinion and sway voters. Businesses interest groups in particular utilize these strategies, because there is an economic incentive in passing favorable laws and conveying a good image to government and the public. One business interest currently benefiting from their interaction with the Obama administration is Monsanto. Monsanto is a billion dollar company responsible for genetically modified seeds, the chemical Roundup and its associated Roundup ready crops, the toxic chemical substance Agent Orange, bovine growth hormones (rBGH), and the synthetic sugar substitute known as aspartame—to name a few. As a business interest group, it has been a terrific success in using government to push its agenda, much to the dismay of environmental activists, scientists, and concerned citizens who want their government to regulate businesses and protect the public. This paper will examine how business interest groups like Monsanto have been able to further their agenda under the Obama administration through the appointment of employees to federal positions, lobbying, and use of media to mobilize public opinion.…
Being a multinational supplier of genetically modified seeds, Monsanto posses severe economic impacts in the international marketplace. Originally, the Bt Cotton seeds should have produced positive externalities upon the Indian economy, however, the enforcement of the biological patent disables the economy from reaching the potential positive effects. Initially, the purpose of the genetically modified cotton seeds were to substantially increase the production of cotton. Higher crop yields would have resulted in cheaper prices for consumerism, as economies of scale would have taken effect. However, as the revenue generated by farmers cannot cover variable costs, a shut down point will be reached within the industry. Farming revenue is irregular…
What would you do if you knew a company you loved and adored, had horrible and atrocious ethics? Many people don’t realize how many businesses practice poor ethics and get away with unethical behavior. One of the most unethical businesses in the world is Monsanto. Most people would agree that Monsanto has been through hell and back because of their Ethics.…
Vice’s article titled “GMOs Aren’t That Bad but Monsanto is Worse” rhetorically argues that Monsanto, a horrible agricultural-biotechnology corporation, is improper engineering and is pushing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on North America. Vice’s key point is that not only does Monsanto engineer and push unhealthy, hazardous inorganic seeds and foods on consumers, but manipulatively takes advantage of the market. The use of pictures, links to more information, and conversational language is what makes this article convincing and reasonable yet compelling and concerning.…
This is very much the case when it comes to GMOs. Culture, religion and ethics are probably the most dominant powers when the adaptation of technology or its demise is considered. Let us consider how the ethical and religious properties show their dominance in regions where religion has a very influential part of the society. According to Hannes Stephan, “the fusion and national identity has attained such a degree in Italy that unwanted innovations (such as GM food) are regarded as alien and “un-italian”, besides posing a threat to artisanal production methods and the reputation of Italian products.” Stephan suggests that it is quite obvious that the cultural contexts do not directly cause specific outcomes but can be seen as a prominent reason for the influence and modeling of public support for genetically modified organisms, this is done by allowing altered cultural-political openings and not considering their alternatives (Stephan 2012).…
Thanks to subliminal advertising and propaganda drilled into our head since we were little, we have come to associate certain foods with wholesomeness and others with nastiness. When we look at the GMO and high-tech food mess from this perspective, we see that it’s the organic-versus-regular battle. What it really boils down, however, is that it’s the producer agenda have be pushed onto the consumer’s mind. They have made us believe that we want and need certain food items in order to be social and successful.…
A genetically modified food or GM food product is defined as “meat and edible plants modified through genetic engineering” (Genetically Modified (GM) Foods, 2015). Furthermore, human beings have engaged in the process of genetically modifying plants and animals, with selective breeding practices within identical species, “since the beginning of civilization” (Genetically Modified (GM) Foods, 2015). However, current methods of genetic modification can cross species boundaries, which require suppressive techniques to ensure the foreign genes are accepted by the target plant or animal (Genetically Modified (GM) Foods, 2015). Indeed, this process has led to significant debates regarding the safety of the products that contain GM ingredients and whether these products should be clearly labeled to assist consumers in making an informed choice.…
Genetically Modified Organisms have become a scientific phenomenon in curing world hunger. Unfortunately, over one billion people fall victim to one of the world’s leading causes of death, malnourishment. Many critics believe that GMOs do not provide enough nutrients and “good stuff”, therefore they believe that many people consuming GMOs are in danger. Others say that GMOs can fix world hunger because they can produce hundreds of GM foods at a time. My side is to believe that GMO shouldn’t be used to solve the problem of world hunger.…
Despite the ongoing, major clinical studies being conducted, the government put their greed before the public’s wellbeing, and granted Monsanto permission to plant genetically modified crops and seeds without the interference of the federal government. With the government stripped of their authority of enforcing GMO sales, Monsanto has broken their chains, and now has full control of the public’s food. If GMO’s are found to be harmful to the consumer’s health, because of this bill, the government will not be able stop Monsanto’s production and distribution. (International Business…
Genetically modified organisms (GMO's) is something that I support, because they provide a long-term solution to food shortages, they have no negative health effects, and they help the environment.…
The most infamous GMO based company is Monsanto. For those who haven’t seen Food Inc. Monsanto is a company that specializes in GMOs and their applications and the patents that insure lots of money. Monsanto forces farmers into their agreements of use and if they should deny and end up using Monsanto’s patented seeds they find themselves with an excessive lawsuit so unreasonable it is impossible for the farmers to have any other option but agree to their terms. Yves Bertheau and John Davison wrote a case study called Genetically Modified and non-Genetically Modified Food Supply Chains examines the interaction between these seeds, “the simulation model presented...permits an analysis of mechanisms for detecting adventitious transfer of GM material…
U.S.-European Union Trade Relations: Issues and Policy Challenges SUMMARY The United States and European Union (EU) share a huge and mutually beneficial economic partnership. Not only is the U.S.-EU trade and investment relationship the largest in the world, it is arguably the most important. Agreement between the two economic superpowers has been critical to making the world trading system more open and efficient. Given a huge level of commercial interactions, trade tensions and disputes are not unexpected.…