Morality Is Morally Absolute Essay

Friedrich Nietzsche once said, “By morality the individual is taught to become a function of the herd, and to ascribe to himself value only as a function…Morality is the herd instinct in the individual.” Is Morality absolute or relative? Although there are many interpretations explaining why both could be right, each of them have theories proving why they could also be wrong. There are billions of people on this earth who come from different cultural backgrounds. Even though no culture is the same, there is a greater number of differences than there are similarities when it comes to the conception of morality. Each culture has different moral and ethical systems. One culture might believe an action is ethically right, while another believes it is wrong. This leads to the main question of this chapter: is Morality totally absolute or can it be relative? The first idea of morality is based off of relativism.
This view is the thesis that there are universal and essential moral values. In other words, if people from other societies do not accept these values, then they are believed to be immoral. Absolutism does not claim that one set of moral rules must be applied to everyone on this earth. One of the central ideas that absolutism is based off is called tolerance. Tolerance is the acceptance of behavior very contrast to our own way and ideas that are not necessarily right.

I think that both theses provide in depth reasoning as to why each of them might be correct. Although, it is quite difficult to choose just one to be the overall concept morality is based on. Personally, I feel as if moral absolutism is more of the better side to take. The idea of there being a universal set of moral and ethical standards seems like it would be more beneficial for society. If every society followed the same standards and implemented the same consequences, I would think that it would force our world to become more