Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Motivation and Expectancy Theory

Better Essays
1135 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Motivation and Expectancy Theory
Evaluate to what extent a) expectancy theory and b) goal theory can explain motivation at work.

If questioned, most people who work would most likely say that they are working to earn money; however, this is not the single need that is contented by working. There are lengthy needs that will satisfy working. We all are different; we all have different reasons for working. There are some mutual reasons such as earning money; whereas, some reasons have more significance for some range of individuals than others. Reade (2003) has drawn attention to the fact that students believe that job satisfaction is more important than money. Therefore, businesses must satisfy workers’ needs to motivate them. Otherwise, employees would not work at their full potential. Heretofore, many theories have been introduced in order to raise businesses’ productivity. Initially, this essay will focus on the expectancy theory, especially its definition, function and criticisms; and later on it will investigate goal theory’s significance, principles and criticisms.

The expectancy theory is a process theory (how people think, how such thoughts influences their behaviours). It focuses on the outcomes rather than needs. This theory believes that effort, performance and motivation must be linked in order to be motivated.
Vroom (1964) offered three variables to account for this, known as valence, instrumentality and expectancy. In his study, he defined the valence as the importance of a value for an individual. For example, if a person is motivated by money, then he/she will not value having less working hours. The instrumentality is defined as the perception of workers whether they will in fact obtain what they wish for. For example, if a worker does a good job he will be rewarded or not. Finally, the expectancy is regarded as the belief that the increased effort will lead to increased performance. Vroom argued that valence, instrumentality and expectancy interact psychologically which creates a motivational force. The former can be calculated by multiplying these three variables. If one of the variables is zero, then, regardless of the value of the other two, the motivational force would be zero. Hence, managers should attempt to maintain their employees’ levels of valence, instrumentality and expectancy high in order to motivate them. Numerous studies and works points out the validity of the expectancy theory. Huczynski and Buchanan (2007) claim that this theory has “intuitive appeal”. They add that research by authors and others appears to support expectancy theory. In addition, Zhang (2006) affirms that expectancy theory ensure high motivation and privileged performance because it keeps performance goals clear and unambiguous. Furthermore, the work of House (2007) reveals that this process theory provides adequate advice and resources for goal achievement. Notably, expectancy theory illustrates all the reasons of employees’ motivation at work. In opposition, the expectancy theory of motivation has drawbacks. The opinion of Huczynski and Buchanan (2007) is that “the theory covers a range of interrelated variables and it is complex”. Additionally, they argue that the relation between individuals’ expectations and numeric values is questionable.

Having considered the expectancy theory, which clarifies, despite its negligible weaknesses, the motivation at work; it is necessary to evaluate Locke’s (1975) goal theory.

Likewise the expectancy theory, goal theory is a process theory. The former is seen as a technique to motivate employees rather than a typical theory. As Locke (1975) observed, setting goals is the best way of motivating a group of people. To motivate, initially, goals must be challenging. That is to say; to have a high performance, goals must be challenging and stretch rather than unchallenging and simple. Secondly, managers and leaders must set up specific goals. SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and time-related) goals are one example of a specific goal. Next, commitment is a key factor to motivate a group. The harder the goal, the more commitment is necessary. Lastly, an efficient goal technique must also comprise feedback which is helpful and needed by the group. Today, many organizations, groups and teams are practicing the goal theory. Especially sport teams use this method to motivate its players. For example, in a World Cup, the national football team of England targets their goal as reaching the final. As a result, players will work in their full potential to achieve that objective because, importantly, the goal is challenging and specific. Also, commitment between teammates and analyzing previous games and tournaments will help to motivate the English footballers. There are many positive aspects of the goal theory. According to Huczynski and Buchanan (2007), feedback is very important for productivity. Whether it is positive or negative, it improves workers’ performance because workers need to know whether they are doing things right or wrong. A positive feedback will encourage them, and a negative one will show where to improve. Besides, clear objectives always motivate and improve people’s performance because individuals are more likely to perform well without uncertainties and ambiguities (Rauch, 2006). In contrast, as Bong (1996) stated, goal theory do not recognize motivating people with rewards. Often, rewards are important features of motivating people. Moreover, Huczynski and Buchanan (2007) remarked that this theory is practical only for short-term targets rather than long-term (more than a year) where goals can be unclear. As a result, goal theory is just a lead which illustrates how to be motivated.

To conclude, taking everything into consideration, both expectancy and goal theory are process theories. In one hand, the expectancy theory argues that the motivation can be obtained by individuals’ expectations. On the other hand, the goal theory explains that setting goals is the best way to motivate people. Expectancy theory takes individual perceptions into account and assumes that everyone is different rather than just guiding people how to be motivated. Therefore, goal theory is an efficient technique of guiding people to be motivated, especially in short-term, but it is not a typical theory explaining motivation at work. As for the expectancy theory, it explains fully the motivation at work by describing all the factors of an employee’s motivation at work

____________________________________________

Bibliography:

- Bong, M. (1996), “Within-grade Changes in Korean Girls’ Motivation and Perception”. Journal of Educational Psychology 97(4) 656-672 - Hall, D. (2007) Business Studies, 3rd ed. London: Causeway Press pp. 418-426 - Hatch, M-J. (1997) Organization Theory, Oxford University Press - House, J. (2007), “Expectancy Theory as a Predictor of Work Behaviour and Attitude”. Decision Sciences 5(3) 481-506 - Huczynski, A. and Buchanan, D. (2007) Organizational Behaviour, 6th ed. FT Prentice Hall - Latham, G. and Locke, E. (2002) “Building A Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation,” American Psychologist 705-714 - Rauch, C. (2006) The Goal-setting Theory. San Diego State University - Zhang, K. et al (2006), Management and Organization Review Vol.2 - http://www.yourdictionary.com/business/expectancy-theory-of-motivation

Bibliography: - Bong, M. (1996), “Within-grade Changes in Korean Girls’ Motivation and Perception”. Journal of Educational Psychology 97(4) 656-672 - Hall, D. (2007) Business Studies, 3rd ed. London: Causeway Press pp. 418-426 - Hatch, M-J. (1997) Organization Theory, Oxford University Press - House, J. (2007), “Expectancy Theory as a Predictor of Work Behaviour and Attitude”. Decision Sciences 5(3) 481-506 - Huczynski, A. and Buchanan, D. (2007) Organizational Behaviour, 6th ed. FT Prentice Hall - Latham, G. and Locke, E. (2002) “Building A Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation,” American Psychologist 705-714 - Rauch, C. (2006) The Goal-setting Theory. San Diego State University - Zhang, K. et al (2006), Management and Organization Review Vol.2 - http://www.yourdictionary.com/business/expectancy-theory-of-motivation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    "Expectancy theory directs us to determine employees ' current views or perceptions about the odds of achieving certain goals and relative preferences for different rewards or "outcomes" in their work.…

    • 4999 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bus 210 Week 6 Checkpoint

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (Jones, G. R. 2007) the expectancy theory “argues that work motivation is a function of an…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Judge describes in Organizational Behavior, the Expectancy Theory, initially developed by Victor Vroom, proposes that an employee can be motivated to maximum levels of performance when a manager can match the organizational rewards to the personal goals. The personal goals are those that they are attractive to individual employees. In order to achieve this, Vroom examines the three key components and relationships that take place between the following aspects of the employer-employee relationship: individual effort, individual performance, organizational rewards, and personal goals.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let1 Task 317.1.1-06

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The expectancy theory was developed by Victor H. Vroom in 1964 as a systematic explanation of individual motivation within the workplace. This theory put forth three key components: expectancy, performance, and valence. From the base component of the theory, which is expectancy, behavior is built by an individual’s value of the reward or valence. Vroom’s theory of expectancy is used by manager to understand how individual employees are motivated and how they will respond to rewards closely tied to the tasks given. Expectancy is proposed to be an individual’s understanding of how their effort leads to a given performance level. Vroom put forth in his theory that individuals believe the more effort put into a task or objective, the better the performance on the task. Therefore, effort leads to performance or E  P. This effort is closely related to the individual’s belief that they can perform the given task (self-efficacy), whether they believe the task is perceived obtainable, and the individual can control the goal or performance. If the result of a strong effort is a good or exceptional performance, than the result of good performance should be a given outcome, P  O. This outcome should be a reward tied closely to the task and performance. A reward that is tied significant to the performance will help to motivate the individual’s effort. The third key factor of Vroom’s expectancy theory is valence. Valence refers to how much value the individual places on the reward, V(R). Again, the reward should be tied to the outcome, but without a perceived value by the individuals, performance will not put forth any effort to begin with. A summary of the Vroom’s expectancy is seen with the following notation. (Web site, Expectancy Theory, 2013)…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let1 Task1

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Expectancy is the first key component of the Expectancy Theory of Motivation. It can be explained as the belief that the employees have about their ability to meet the performance of a certain level. It is often called the effort-performance relationship. If a person does not believe that they are able to meet their employers performance standards no matter what they do, they will lose all of the motivation that they have.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wgu Paper

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The expectancy theory is a theory that suggests that the motivation of an individual to perform in a certain manner is dependent on how much the individual anticipates that the performance will be followed by a reward and on how much the said reward means to the individual. In other words, the individual’s motivation is measured by how much an individual wants a reward (Valence), the assessment of the likelihood that the effort will lead to expected performance (Expectancy) and the belief that the performance will lead to reward (Instrumentality). Where valance is the strength of the individual’s preference for a particular reward, Expectancy ca be described as the individual’s confidence in his ability and skill to produce the necessary level of performance and Instrumentality is the individual’s estimate of the chance that by producing the necessary level of performance, it’ll result in various work rewards. The expectancy theory concentrates on the following three relationships:…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    -According to expectancy-value models, one’s motivation to pursue a particular course of action will depend on two factors:…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nursing Theory

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An individual will act (performance) in a certain manner b/c there is an expectation (motivation) that the act will result in an outcome.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss

    • 3825 Words
    • 16 Pages

    I am motivated by expectation, I put more efforts into my work when I know there are expectation rewards related to my performance.…

    • 3825 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Workplace Ethnography

    • 1790 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Lunenburg, F. (2011). Expectancy Theory of Motivation: Motivating by Altering Expectations. International Journal Of Management, Business And Administrations Volume, 15.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Expectancy Theory

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In today's society, motivation is a much talked about topic and not very clearly understood. Most companies look for ways to improve efficiency, productivity and quality. This is achieved by higher levels of motivation. People are generally motivated when they believe their efforts will yield an acceptable performance, performance will be rewarded and the value of the reward is highly positive. (Schermerhorn, John, James, Osborn & Richard 2005). This is otherwise known as Victor Vroom's expectancy theory. The purpose of this essay is to provide an overview of the expectancy theory by describing the three variables that support this theory and provide examples of how and when it has influenced my motivation within the work force.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Neil, H. F. (1994). Goal Setting Theory. Motivation: theory and research (). Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (1994). Goal-setting theory. In H.F. O’Neil, Jr.& M. Drillings (eds.), Motivation, theory and research (pp13-29). London, Ontario: Arnold.…

    • 7680 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Motivation Theory

    • 3627 Words
    • 15 Pages

    * Redmond, B. F. (2010). Goal-Setting theory: What am I trying to achieve in my work? Work Attitudes and Motivation. The Pennsylvania State University World Campus/…

    • 3627 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    3. A critical evaluation of the similarities and differences between reinforcement and the expectancy theories of motivation. Motivating a choice as to which one has the mist relevance to explaining the work motivation of employees in South Africa.…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics