To begin, the conclusion is based largely on the perception that issued alternatives certainly lead to the higher efficiency of the school. In doing this, the author fails to mention other possible factors that can impress parent decisions. It is likely that the school tuition is very high regarding the vast facilities the school provided. Thereby, many families can’t afford the cost. It is either likely that the school is located in far distance from the city, so many parents couldn’t manage to handle their children’s schedule. Since …show more content…
Even if the other factors that have influence on a family decision are acceptable, then the author should support his claim that the school has high quality of performance. Since the author mentions that there is a variety range of different age students and there is no audition to get into the school also, one couldn’t move to the conclusion that these conditions could be seen as positive factors. There is a possibility these characters Caused an uneven circumstance that affect the quality of instruction negatively. Therefore, the author should provide some evidences to show how these factors had positive effects on the education process.
Finally, the argument claims without any warrant that since there are some distinguished musicians in the faculty of school, one can concludes that the school has positive performance too. However, the conclusion is logically unsound because the arguer fails to indicate any reliable statics that confirm this claim. Furthermore, the author fails to consider other possibility that could cause many student success. May be, they have participated in other schools too. Moreover, maybe they are not majorly part of the school students. All these faulty assumptions lead to an untenable conclusion. To bolster the conclusion the author should provide certain facts or statics that explicitly shows the link between remarkable faculty and high performance of the