Preview

Muller Vs Harris

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
920 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Muller Vs Harris
In the case of Muller Vs Oregon (1908), the Supreme Court ruled that Oregon was protecting women from working more than eight hours (protectionism). However, in the current times we live in some people would have seen as a case of discrimination at work since men would work more hours thus earning more than women. The reason I chose the topic was because I have known people who have been discriminated while at work, based on their ethnicity or nation of origin. Even though the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972 has helped reduce cases of discrimination in a work environment. There have still been cases of sexual discrimination in major media conglomerates and also other industries. There are organizations that help stop discrimination …show more content…
Forklift Systems Inc. (1993) this was a case that made helped define a hostile and abusive work environment. Teresa Harris was a manager at Forklift Systems Inc.; she alleged that within a period of 2 years the president of the company was subject to gender discrimination. She claimed that he used sexual remarks when talking to her and even offered sexual advance offers; he did this even in the presence of fellow employees. She confronted him about his actions and his response was that he was fooling around and he also apologized to her promising to seize that kind of behavior. However, after a few months his boss began to harass her again. She later on quit her job claiming it was an unsafe environment for her to work. Harris filed a suit in State District court but the court ruled that Harris’s employer did not make a cruel environment for her. They stated it would not affect someone’s psychological being and performance at work. The Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia expressed that frustration inherent in attempts to succinctly define sexual harassment. The decision was criticized for its vagueness (49). The suit was late settled outside the courts. The terms for settlement were not released to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This law prohibits employers from discriminating their employees on the basis of religion, race, sex, color, and national origin. Since Mrs. Ledbetter was paid significantly less than her male employees at Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. it is evident that she felt she was a victim of gender discrimination, and thus filed a complaint against Goodyear for violating the Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The facts in the case of Thompson V North American Stainless, LP 562 U.S._ (2011) are fairly straightforward. The petitioner in this case, Eric Thompson, was seemingly fired from his job at North American Stainless (NAS) because his fiancée, Miriam Regalado filed a sexual discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). His suit was filed under Title VII claiming that his dismissal was retaliation for his fiancée’s charge. (Pagnattaro, Cahoy, Magid, Reed, & Shedd, n.d.)…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mgmt 520 Week 5 Assignment

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Based on the given facts, she was the subject of jokes in her work place as she was being picked on based on her gender. Since she was the only woman in her department, the male employees subject her to cruel and mean jokes on several occasion when other workers placed a sign on a truck that stated "Hardhat Required/Bra Optional”. This is clearly an illustration that she is working in a hostile environment since the repeated jokes made on her gender has created an intimidating place of work. The case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is applicable to Pollard where the Supreme Court ruled that hostile work environment sex discrimination is an actionable wrong under Title VII. The fact that the Vice President of the bank made sexual advances against complainant created a hostile work environment and is a form of a sexual harassment covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The severe and pervasive conduct of the vice president who repeated sexually abused on the victim in exchange for sexual favors at the office qualify the acts as punishable under Title VII. Here, the acts of the Teddy’s workers against Pollard constitute Hostile Work Environment (HWE) sexual harassment through the vulgar sexual jokes and…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only was it important for the obvious reasons such as limiting the work day of women to 10 hours and protecting their wellbeing in the workplace, it was also significant for some other less obvious reasons. Some may believe that this case facilitates gender discrimination in the workplace, an issue that has been debated for countless decades. If the Supreme Court can rule to deny women their fourteenth amendment rights – even if it is claimed to be “for their own good,” then how can women ever escape the common stereotype of being inferior to men? It is difficult for feminists of the time who were fighting for equality to contend with this court case that basically encourages different regulations for men and women in the…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    | Dear Mr. Moore, After reviewing this case, I can state that Teddy’s Supplies is definitely liable for the workplace and sexual harassment against Virginia Pollard. According to the facts, it’s indicated that Ms. Pollard (plaintiff) was placed in a ‘hostile’ environment and Mr. Steve King was her supervisor. Although it is not illegal for 1 woman to work with a group of men, it should be carefully determined by the employer if the environment is suitable for males and females to work together. In this case, it was not a good idea for 1 woman to work with male associates. • Workplace environment can by justified by 7 ways: race, gender, national origin, religious, color, age and disability. In this case, Pollard was constantly being harassed by her male colleagues. They played pranks on her by locking her drawers shut, filling the guard shack with trash, locking her out of the guard shack and therefore she was not able to perform her job duty since she was responsible for watching warehouse inventory. Also, Ms. Pollard was put into unnecessary risk of harm when a coworker backed a forklift up to the guard shack and it backfire into her ear. Ms. Pollard could have sustained injuries if the forklift had hit her because it weighted 3 tons and it could have easily injured her eardrums because it is very loud.…

    • 2218 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This well-intentioned law only addressed one segment of the working population: women, and not even addressing the entire segment but merely protecting factory and laundry-working women. Arguments for the law focused on the need to protect workers, albeit some workers, by opening the door for future, more far-reaching protective laws. On the other hand, this very same law created sex-discrimination; treating women as a separate class of workers than…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mgmt402 Unit 5 Db

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Discrimination is a rising concern among employees in each organization environment. The theories both support the need for antidiscrimination laws and policies. The theories support the laws and policies by protecting employees and also help to support regulations and rules of administration of the business. Without the laws and policies in place with the support of the theories, then discrimination would be an issue for many applicants in the workforce.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employers must understand that the persons who evaluate and decide the outcome of employment discrimination cases (the EEOC investigator, federal or state judge, and/or jury) have keen senses of fairness and expect that employees will be treated in a fair manner. As a result, employers are exposed to substantial liability for any acts, including perceived acts, of discrimination in the workplace. Employers should take any charge of discrimination seriously and the employer must keep in mind that, at a minimum, it needs to have a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for taking the action in question. In addition, an employer's response will be evaluated by persons who have a different perspective than the employer. What…

    • 964 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The category I chose to explore was gender, gender can be a broad term that can include a person’s sex (male, female, or chose not to answer). This category extends to difference in treatment in the workplace according to gender, such as compensation, the hiring/firing/training/benefits process. In the case of Anderson v. City & County of San Francisco, Speckman (2014), indicated that 35 male and female deputies from San Francisco Sheriff’s Department filed a consolidated claim against both the city and county claiming discrimination against male deputies in violation of Title VII and California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Speckman, 2014). In October 2006 the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department implemented a new policy to prohibit male deputies from holding supervisory…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    HRM324

    • 786 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Employment Laws Chart Complete the chart below using information from the weekly readings and additional research if necessary. Employment Law Description and Requirement of LawCourt Case Influential to Establishment of Law Importance of Law Workplace Application Civil Rights Act of 1964 Prohibits discrimination of hiring, compensation conditions, and privileges of employment based on race, religion, color, sex, or nationalityKatzenbach. McClung and Heart of Atlanta v. United StatesThe Civil Rights Act of 1964 ensures that every person is allowed the same chance of getting hired based on their job qualifications regardless of, sex race, color, religion, or national origin. Employers are required to post sign with the Title VII description in employee break-rooms. Equal Employment Opportunity Act Employers are not allowed to discriminate against employees on the basis of age, race, sex, creed, religion, color, or national origin. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenEqual Employment Opportunity Act is to ensure that Civil Rights Act requirements are being followed and gives power to the Employment CommissionMeeting requirements by hiring people regardless of their national origin or race. Equal Pay Act Requires that mean and women working in the same place be given equal amount of pay for equal work. Schultz v. Wheaton Glass Co. 1970It ensures everyone is paid the same wage for identical jobs regardless of their sex.Today employees are getting paid based on their knowledge and experience. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 Protects employees ages 40 to 65 from discriminationGomez v. PotterADEA is that it protects the older employees for discriminationCompanies like to use older persons as door greeters Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in employment, state and local government, public accommodations, commercial, facilities, transportation, and…

    • 786 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When sex discrimination was set out the aim of it was to stop the sex discrimination at work. Even now woman 's are employed at work but there still a bit of discrimination going on…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * The Civil Rights Act of 1991: It specifies that women who face job-related discrimination are entitled to monetary damages. Women who observe discriminatory behaviour can consult with lawyers, including civil rights advocates who offer free advice and may even take a case and charge small or no legal fees. However, equal rights for women in the workplace does not eliminate the reality of merit-based pay and variable pay scales for workers based on seniority and job effectiveness. Women are simply entitled to the same…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unemployment Rate

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Block, W., & Portillo, J. (August, 2012). Journal of Business Ethics: Anti-Discrimination Laws, Vol. 109…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gregory, R. F. (2003). Women and workplace discrimination, overcoming barriers to gender equality. Rutgers University Press.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sexual harassment has been a problem throughout history not only for women but for men as well, but the focus of this paper will be on sexual harassment towards women in the workplace. Over the years, legislators have won the vote of sexual harassment being defined as sexual discrimination, in other words, treating someone of any race unfairly because of their gender. The word sexual harassment is not…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays