Preview

My Listenable Speech: Death Penalty

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1067 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
My Listenable Speech: Death Penalty
Linda Petros-Gouin

Course Name: Interpersonal Communication
-------------------------------------------------
Instructor’s Name: Jean Marie Slover
Cultural Differences

“Killing People, Who Kill People, To Teach That Killing People is Wrong”. This is a common quote used in circles of those who oppose the death penalty. I strongly believe that the death penalty violates not only our inalienable rights as members of the human family but our Eighth Amendment ("Excessive bail shall not be required, no excessive fines imposed or cruel or unusual punishments inflicted”) as dwellers within the United States.
There are thirty eight states within the United States of America that currently employee the death penalty. A death sentence may be carried out by one of these five lawful means; electrocution, hanging, lethal injection, gas chamber, and firing squad. Yes, firing squad is a current lawful means. The definition of the death penalty by the Supreme Court is: the lawful infliction of death as a punishment. An eye for an eye mentality, in my opinion, only makes the world go blind. I believe whole-heartedly in the principles of nonviolence as explained by Dr. Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi. I do not believe that the death penalty should be practiced or that the death penalty is a deterrent to crime. I believe that is it unconstitutional. I t shocks me that the United States is the last of all Western Democracies to continue in such a barbaric practice.
The principles of nonviolence as stated by Dr. Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi are:
Principle One: Non-violence is a way of life for courageous people. It is not about being passive, a push over or weak. Non-violence is aggressive spiritually mentally and emotionally.
Principle Two: Non-violence seeks to win friendship and understanding, the result being redemption and / or reconciliation.
Principle Three: Non-violence seeks to defeat injustice, not people. “Evildoers” are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Forterra Case Study

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1989, a small group of committed volunteers from the Seattle King County Land Trust established Forterra, a land conservation organization based on their mutually held belief that conservation efforts should embrace the combination of private organizations and public action. Since then, this organization has made significant environmental contributions throughout the state of Washington and continues to promote environmental justice. ForTerraʻs primary vision is to preserve all aspects of the environment, not only designated sections of pristine, undeveloped land. This vision derives from the biological reality that all forms of life are interdependent, and that in order for us humans to thrive, all other living parts of nature must thrive…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statement of revenue and expense. This information specifies a longer period of time. This information indicates a net profit or net loss of revenue within a fiscal time frame.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some think that an eye for an eye is an effective means of punishment, but others believe that such means of punishment are not effective in today's society. In the United States, thirty-three states are currently using the death penalty. Kelly Gissendaner is being executed by lethal injection after the Supreme court denies her stay in life in prison for the murder of her husband in February 1997.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    terms aren’t met, nonviolence gently reminds rather than forces the adversary of the terms. In…

    • 2937 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Nonviolence means avoiding not only external physical violence but also internal violence of spirit. You not only refuse to shoot a man, but you refuse to hate him." Not always do we need to use violence to express how we feel. Anger, people tend to use violence, but I believe that communication is necessary. Communication would help everyone throughout the world.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Worth The Alert Case

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    E –The Principle of "Do No Harm" is a no brainier, I also believe that The Principle of Fidelity, The Principle of Lawfulness, ECI, "The…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second principle mentioned that nonviolence seeks to win the “friendship and understanding of the opponent.” The purpose was not to humiliate the individual but to amalgamate the people, resulting in redemption and reconciliation instead of bitterness and chaos that came from violent resistance.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    b) Non-violence should only be used when others show non-violence, if violence is done to one than they must answer with violence and not be stepped on. However, non-violence is ineffective due to the fact that it does not show any forceful action toward a cause Malcolm believes that one has to “die for what you believe in”.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nonviolent struggle has been utilized countless times throughout the history of civilization. Contrary to popular belief, many of the world’s greatest wars are fought free of violence. Nonviolent actions offer an alternative approach to conflict resolution; one that does not resort to literal war and prevents blood shedding. The motivation behind these struggles vary, but the desired outcome is always to promote or prevent a change. Conflicts are diverse, and typically they are concerned with social, economic, ethnic, religious, national, humanitarian, and political matters (Sharp, 2005, p. 15).…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We affirm the philosophical or religious ideal of nonviolence as the foundation of our purpose, the presupposition of our faith, and the manner of our action. Nonviolence as it grows from Judaic-Christian traditions seeks a social order of justice permeated by love. Integration of human endeavor represents the crucial first step towards such a society.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I initially found it almost absurd that people who support the death penalty, but I soon realized that the grieving families who lost their loved one would feel more comfortable knowing that the punishment had been paid. It And that for them, they can rest easier and continue on with their lives. And that with the process of the death penalty, the criminal would have an impossible chance to escape the prison and commit more crimes.Many of the students that favored pro death were affected by a criminal hurting one of their loved ones. And as soon as I realized this, it made perfect sense that they wanted the death penalty out of defense for themselves and their community, because they did not desire anyone to endure their…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    me myself and I

    • 1314 Words
    • 14 Pages

    presupposition of our faith, and the manner of our action. Nonviolence as it grows from Judaic-Christian…

    • 1314 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Violence Necessary?

    • 2821 Words
    • 12 Pages

    We have come to a point where everyone feels unsafe and unsecure because of the countless acts of violence that are happening in our society. There had been so many people in the past who died, who became victims, who were injured, and who suffered because of other people’s violent behaviors. When we open the television, we see people killing, murdering and abusing other individuals or group of people. We see all the news headlines in newspapers screaming about the unending conflicts between nations and unimaginable crimes that are happening in every part of the world. As of today, violence is doubtlessly widespread and this has been one of the issues that our society is still struggling to find for solutions. We might recognize the fact that almost all of us have good morals and values, and have good intentions but we can not deny that people are also capable of the most offensive and menacing behavior. But we always ask ourselves, do we get something good out of acting violently? Many of us object on the spread of violence because for the obvious reason that imposing pain into a person, making him suffer or lose his life is an immoral act. We might also need to acknowledge the fact that people have their own reasons and intentions for acting violently, but is it worth it? Is violence necessary to solve every conflict? Is violence really necessary that most of the people have been engaging themselves with these all sort of obnoxious behaviors? Violence is not necessary especially in situations where violence is not used for a good cause and there are also other ways to compromise a dispute, but there are also extreme situations where violence is necessary especially when we are protecting our lives or other people’s lives from evil people.…

    • 2821 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As long as human beings have had the capacity to think and make decisions, there have been good and bad actions made by people toward one another. The way society treats these actions varies by time period, location, and situation surrounding the deed. Bad deeds have had a huge spectrum of punishments, and today, in this country, the worst a man can earn is the death penalty. It is, by definition, the punishment of execution, administered to someone convicted of a capital crime. If one is going to discuss this topic they must first understand what this means; someone is having their life taken away because of an action to society. The death penalty is wrong and should be abolished by the American Government, because…

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment is the ultimate means to end someone’s life. Currently, capital punishment, or the death penalty, is used in the United States. Although it is legal in the United States, only thirty-two states have adopted the law. The goal of those states is to deter the criminals and recover justice. However, capital punishment is the wrong way to punish someone, which affected the moral issues and misconceptions. The moral issues that illustrate the death penalty as an error are the conviction of innocent people, rejudice against minorities, cruel and unusual punishment involved in the process of capital punishment. While the misconceptions include…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays