Preview

My Woll Readings

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
My Woll Readings
Woll Readings Part 1

Chapter 1, 5: How not to read the Constitution
This passage speaks about how the Constitution satisfies citizens and how it is created to prevent tyranny. This of course was written to prevent the tyranny that King George had upon the English. The founding fathers not only wished to prevent tyranny, they also wished to preserve liberty. This also caused them to create a “Bill of Rights” something which many of the founding fathers disagreed with at first. The Constitution however, is up to much interpretation. Thus it needs to be constantly amended and needs to evolve as society and their ideas evolve. This is the basis to the Amendment process and allows for the Constitution to hold for a long time. Constitution also contradicts itself quite often. This is explained by the massive size of the documents and how much it must be applicable for.

Chapter 2, 1: Federalism The topic of Federalism was debated upon widely during the creation of the Constitution. For example, Federalism was negatively viewed at first because states felt that the federalism would undermine their power and cause a strong central government which would continue the tyranny that the people despised, something which caused them to break away from England in the first place. The passage also brings up desegregation laws that greatly decreased the power of the states since it required the states to conform to the will of the government. This of course angered the states and caused many to wonder how far the power of the government should extend. The passage also talks about the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which included the inability to raise an Army, no efficient way of raising funding for the government to function, and an overall lack of power. The government had to rely on the states for any control they could exercise and the states often would not help the government. Alexander Hamilton later speaks about the pros to the federal constitution

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Without the decisions the government made together we would've never came into an equal equality, without solving the world’s biggest problems. In the summer of 1787 , fifty five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in philadelphia to fix the national gov’t. The problem was that the government under the articles of confederation, the challenge was to create a strong central government without letting anyone get too much power. How did the Constitution Guard against Tyranny? In further reading you will see how they divided the powers that were given to them to help the nation and states around the world, that fills up the world’s problems.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Creating the new Constitution would bind the states into one alliance and allow the country to run smoothly. Hamilton thoughtfully accepts the notion of the government allowing the states running themselves is not foolish. However, the states would be “depending for its execution on the good faith of the parties”(8), and only take laws created by the national government as “mere recommendations” and “disregard at their option” (8). The states selfishness about their own well being and not considering that of the nation is a clear factor that the power of executing in a correct manner as a union is important for the future of the country in order for us not to fall under an anarchy. Furthermore, the flaws of the Articles of Confederation increased overtime causing there to be numerous issues.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As soon as the Americans first broke away from Britain, they wanted their government to not resemble Britain’s at all. By doing this, they adopted the Articles of Confederation that had no national executive branch. However, because the government under the Articles of Confederation had about no power because it couldn’t raise money through taxes, the people who led the national government came to realize that a more centralized government was needed. As the constitution was written and it was in the process of being ratified by all the states, the federalist papers written mostly by Alexander Hamilton were written. In one paper by James Madison, he writes “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition” (Doc I), which shows the concept of checks and balances could be used to keep the national government in line and controlled. The Constitution, finally ratified, was similar to Britain’s government but also different in its more active system of checks and balances.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." During those years the United States government was still developing and the Articles of Confederation was not an effective form of government. The states had a strong objection against the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was not a government well suited for this new country. The United States needed power over the states to make it a better place to live and have separate states with different laws.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Not to Read the Constitution is an articles that addresses the abstract qualities of the Constitution and how it should be interpreted as a living, changing document. In 1787, the Constitution was signed, included in this historic document were guaranteed basic rights, fundamental laws and the establishment of America’s national government. However, the Constitution was not America’s first governing document, the Articles of Confederation were. Under the Articles of Confederation America’s national government grew week. The states functioned individually like countries. In result of this, some national leaders decided that the Articles of the Confederation was a fail and it was time to try something new. In 1787, at a convention some delegates…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1987 DBQ

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The misinterpretation and different views of what was stated in the Constitution contributed to the sectional discord, tension and failure of the Union. The Constitution was written almost a century before all these problems occurred, they could not have foreseen such issues back then. Although the Constitution was written very well for that time period, it does unfortunately contribute to the failing of the Union.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton once said “A nation without a national government is, in my view, an awful spectacle.” The federalist papers are a collections of letters, articles, and essays that set out to change people’s mind about the Constitution. The Federalist papers had contributors like Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison who were in favor of a strong National Government. There was a wide spread outcry that the Constitution would infringe on the authority of the states. In the subsequent paragraphs I will summarize the key points of particular Federalist Papers No.17 and No.45.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Founders’ perceptions were that America was weak and de-centralized. They created a weak, confederal government designed to protect people’s liberties by being to small to be a threat, but it was too small to handle national problems. The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution are that one, the US Constitution has a Bill of Rights, the power of the president is addressed and the separation of the branches. This changed occurred to make the government stronger and address the nation’s problems. The Anti-Federalists were a large group who didn’t like the Constitution but didn’t know what they wanted yet and they contributed to the branches. The Federalist were defenders of the constitution and they contributed to the bill of…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Perhaps one of the greatest failures of the Article was the inability to control trade. Trade is a major income and help for the economy as well as a necessity for the common American. Trade brings in products from all over the world that could not be provided nor produced, to the countries that receive the products. According to the Articles, Congress only had the power to control trade with the Native Americans, and even that small amount of power could be argued by the discontent of state representatives. The states passed almost all laws regarding trade whenever they saw fit. The central government was supposed to deal with issues concerning foreign trade but because of the ban of different imports of certain products as well as exports, this too became a struggle. The states having had most of the power did lack the ability to control foreign trade; this created a vicious cycle of states wanting foreign trade, so they passed the issue to the central government that didn’t have enough power because of the states. Each state had its very own trading policy creating no united policy that benefited all of the states as a unit. America was sinking in economic havoc, they had little income and products coming in that were so needed to keep the economy afloat.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill Of Rights Synthesis

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This article is explaining the author Walter William’s opinion on why the Bill of Rights were written. He states that they were written because “Congress could not be trusted with our God-given rights.” The article also explained that the Amendments within the Bill of Rights were written because the “Government was the enemy of the people.” Even though the government was the “enemy” it was still needed to provided the State's protection.Others think that the Bill of Rights were “unnecessary and dangerous.” One of the individuals that felt it was unnecessary and dangerous was Alexander Hamilton, he felt that the government should have more power than the States.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early years of American History, the Articles of Confederation began to fail and officials realized that a new document needed to be written in place of the Articles. This debate of what to do formed two main groups, the federalists and antifederalists. In the following paragraphs I will explain five key issues and each side of the argument. Each side will be explained because I do not think one side could fully encapsulate what was needed in the new central government. It is true that there have been very few successful republics in the history of the world.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Feds

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalists favored the ratification of the constitution. They also favored a powerful federal government. “Federal men” argued that a Bill of Rights wasn’t needed as federal power was limited. James Madison and Alexander Hamilton also wrote The Federalist Papers. Issues like how they thought the Constitution would affect the people of the nation were discussed in the essays. “All men of sense will agree in the necessity of an energetic executive … The ingredients which constitute energy in the executive are unity; duration; an adequate provision for its support; and competent powers.” Alexander Hamilton explains that a strong executive power is needed in order to protect the nation from foreign attack. “It is evident, therefore, that according to their primitive signification, they have no application to constitutions professedly founded upon the power of the people, and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing, and as they retain everything, they have no need of particular reservations.” Alexander Hamilton presented the reasons why he thought a bill of rights wasn’t necessary and instead could cause serious problems.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays