Preview

The Feds

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
549 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Feds
Maggie Denning

People who supported the Constitution without change and wanted immediate ratification were known as Federalists like James Madison. Anti-Federalists were against a strong central government. They wanted a system where the states were supreme. Anti-federalists also agreed with the New Jersey plan. Anti-federalists are wrong. They basically believe in a monarchy where citizens have no say in the government. Federalists favored the ratification of the constitution. They also favored a powerful federal government. “Federal men” argued that a Bill of Rights wasn’t needed as federal power was limited. James Madison and Alexander Hamilton also wrote The Federalist Papers. Issues like how they thought the Constitution would affect the people of the nation were discussed in the essays. “All men of sense will agree in the necessity of an energetic executive … The ingredients which constitute energy in the executive are unity; duration; an adequate provision for its support; and competent powers.” Alexander Hamilton explains that a strong executive power is needed in order to protect the nation from foreign attack. “It is evident, therefore, that according to their primitive signification, they have no application to constitutions professedly founded upon the power of the people, and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing, and as they retain everything, they have no need of particular reservations.” Alexander Hamilton presented the reasons why he thought a bill of rights wasn’t necessary and instead could cause serious problems. Anti-federalists opposed ratification of the constitution. They wanted a weak federal government that wouldn’t threaten states’ rights. Anti-feds also wanted a Bill of Rights to declare and protect the rights of people. “As long as we can preserve our unalienable rights, we are in safety.” They didn’t want any of their natural rights to be taken away. “It

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people in the States believed that the best way to come together as a country was by having a centralised federal government. These people, known as Federalists, supported the adoption of the Constitution. They produced the Federalist Papers to gain support. Their opponents, the Antifederalists, argued that a centralised government would turn into the same type of government from which they had just won independence. As the Constitution did not include citizen’s rights, a Bill of Rights was added after its ratification.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalists, and his party believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution. This means they think that certain powers not specifically given to the federal government was more or less implied. Hamilton says “The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge or determine right.” He and the Federalists think the government needs more control to run its…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists won for numerous reasons. The Anti-Federalists had delayed representation while the Federalists promised to amend the Constitution to better protect individual's rights (Faragher, 181). Overall, it was the Federalist representation, planning,…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists have their reasons & the Federalists have theirs. I’m against the idea of a central government and how the freedom of the states should be.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Who were the anti-federalists? Describe their views during the ratification debates and identify an important part of the Constitution that resulted from their involvement. Anti-federalists were a group of diverse individuals that opposed the new federal constitution. They were united by their fear of the new constitution that placing more power in the hands of national government was dangerous.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the Anti-Federalists believed that mankind always seeks freedom and a social contract between the person and the state or the government to protect safety and rights such as happiness, self-defense and unalienable. Anti-Federalists also believed states declaration of rights is not enough and that these rights are so essential to life such as life, liberty and property that we can’t even risk losing it. After all it was seen necessary to specifically have Bill of Rights as the Anti-Federalists wanted to keep our…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many founding fathers demanded a “bill of rights” that protected the people from the government. The Antifederalists were in favor of the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution because it would promise individual rights and most importantly, to ensure that the citizens would not be treated the way that the British treated them. The Federalists opposed this because believed that the government should have all of the power in a government, and the individual should not have any. In the end, James Madison promised to add a Bill of Rights to the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Constitutional Period, there were two groups of people; one group called the Federalists, wanted a stronger national government and one group called the Anti-Federalists, opposed the development of a national government. The Federalists ratified the Constitution to help properly manage the debt and tensions following the American Revolution. The Anti-Federalists opposed the development of a strong federal government and the ratification of the Constitution, preferring instead for power to remain in the hands of state and local governments. Although the Anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in the prevention of the adoption of the Constitution, their efforts were responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of Rights.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    under the Articles of Confederation, just edit it a little. They wanted the states to hold the supreme power rather than the national government. Most feared that the constitution would turn our government into a monarchy. Brutus I made the statement, “And are by this clause invested with the power of making all laws, proper and necessary, for carrying all these into execution; and they may so exercise this power as entirely to annihilate all the state governments, and reduce this country to one single government.“ The name Anti-federalist is actually misleading, they were actually more for federalism than the federalist, as they wanted the power more separated to the states. Their thoughts were that a government under the constitution would lead to corruption as the power hungry federal government would become corrupt and try to consolidate all of the power.“In the new Constitution, the President and Senate have all the executive, and two thirds of the legislative power. In some weighty instances, (as making all kinds of treaties, which are to be the laws of the land,) they have the whole legislative and executive powers. They, jointly, appoint all officers, civil and military; and they (the Senate) try all impeachments, either of their own members or of the officers appointed by themselves.“ -Richard Henry…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason that motivated the Anti-Federalist to demand the passing of the Bill of Rights was to protect basic humans rights won from the American Revolution so that a strong national government will not be able to take such rights away. So that certain common liberties and rights would be protected no matter what. Most of which was fueled by the fear of a tyrannical government that would be too powerful, and would have unchecked power to do whatever…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists were for ratification, supporting the Constitution and everything in it. A few Federalists by the names of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison wrote a collection of eighty-five articles and essays about the Constitution under the pseudonym Publius. Anti-Federalists did not support the Constitution for many reasons, one being the fact that it did not have a Bill of Rights. Another complaint was that the Constitution gave too much power to the central government, putting the states in danger.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who supported the new Constitution, the Federalists, began to publish articles supporting ratification. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay eventually compiled 85 essays as The Federalist Papers. These supporters of the Constitution believed that the checks and balances system would allow a strong central government to preserve states' rights. They felt that the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that they were in need for a change (http://www.congressforkids.net/Constitution_ratifyingconstitution.htm). President George Washington wrote a letter to John Jay on August 1, 1786. In this letter Washington agrees with Jay’s criticism of the Articles of Confederation and says “we have errors to correct. We have probably had to good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation…” The Articles of Confederation had “errors” that needed to be corrected. He complained that the thirteen “disunited states” could never agree. He also suggest that human nature being what it was, America needed a stronger, less democratic national government (doc.3).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays