I look at writing like an ongoing conversation; when someone initiates a conversation with me and they don’t have such a great introduction, I’m no longer as interested in the conversation as I would have been if the introduction grabbed my attention. I look at my intro as if I am writing an overview; I start with my one liner, move into my thesis, and slowly ease my way into introducing the critical information. It takes me about an hour alone to craft my introduction, and I am constantly editing it.
I brainstorm and methodically outline my body paragraphs: bulleting, ordering the information chronologically, and citing. I make brain maps sometimes with color coded information so I can organize my information to make it smooth as possible. My greatest challenge is elaboration: never elaborating enough, not making the information clear as possible, and forgetting key details that would make my essay flow easier. I’m trying to get better at showing my rambling thoughts in a way someone else can understand them. This mind isn’t easy to …show more content…
If I haven’t included enough information or my essay doesn’t make sense, how dare I end it. My conclusion would be fifty shades of messed up and I would have to delete and rewrite a thousand times and I am already doing that for my introduction. To save time I just have some close friends read and give me constructive criticism. When no one cares to read my essay, I copy and paste my essay into a text to speech template and it reads my essay aloud. This allows me to hear the actual flow of my essay and I can edit as I hear mistakes and improper