Nano's Argument

The nano’s argument is that the Paul’s perspective that Christianity has been trumped by certain quarters as being a “replacement” to Judaism. But, Nano happily suggests that Christians can learn more about Judaism by reading Paul. For Nano’s, Paul was understood as a strict follower of the Torah or, at least, an observant Jew, but the proposal of law free-living is not for the Jew but for the non-Jews. This is where Nano’s brought so many Jews and non-Jews perspective, this is a strange but worth reading, that Paul is “involved in the spread of first-century Judaism from the perspective of a Jewish coalition” (167). Nano’s explains that this “a temporary group committed to a specific task” within and on behalf of the larger Jewish community”