Preview

Napster vs. Music

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
771 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Napster vs. Music
Napster is an online trading program that allows users to look into another persons hard-drive in order to trade music. "Napster and similar software provides users with a method of searching thousands of other users computers to share thousands of high quality music, music that is stored in the compressed .mp3 format."(Internet). Music of the popular artist is traded through the Internet at no cost. In other words instead of having to pay market price for music users of Napster receive the music for free. Napster has caused major controversy throughout the music industry. " The recording Industry association of America is suing Napster, claiming it allows users to make illegal copies of the copyrighted songs. It is seeking an injunction against the service and damages for lost revenue from thousands of songs it says were pirated through tapsters program (Internet). So one must look at the question, are programs like Napster illegal or does the program actually have some validity. There are several people against the use of programs like Napster. The band Metallica filed the first federal suit against Napster. The band is suing the company for copyright infringement and racketeering. Lars Ulrich, the band drummer says; "Napster hijacked our music without asking. They never sought out permission. Out catalog of music simply became available as free downloads on the Napster system"(Internet). Metallica is suing Napster and has accused Napster of copyright infringement and racketeering. The Metallica bands as well as other groups believe that Napster has cost them much money. They do not believe it is fair that people can go in and download their music for free instead of having to pay for it. The drummer suggested that the music traders were cowards using high technology for low-down theft (Metallica). In this day and age on has to consider the money issues. These issues are what make Napster bad. Napster has been accused of illegal acts

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    BIS 375 Final Exam

    • 612 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since Napster encouraged peer-to-peer file sharing and did not actually publish music at its site, the courts ruled that Napster's operations were exempt from traditional copyright laws.…

    • 612 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    NT 1210

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page

    Napster is a name given to two music-focused online services. It was originally founded as a pioneering Internet service that emphasized sharing audio files, typically music, encoded in mp3 format. The original company ran into legal difficulties over copyright infringement , had to stop operations and was eventually acquired by Roxio. In its second incarnation Napster became an online music store until it was acquired by Rhapsody from Best Buy on December 1, 2011.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chap 16 Govt 2302

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    8. The rise of Napster in the 1990s and other music exchange services demonstrates 1. that new technologies have made it more difficult for the government to protect property.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Napster introduced a revolutionary change to the way music was distributed conventionally. Music companies worked with the artists to produce music. Thereafter they invested heavily into burning the music CD’s, marketing and advertising of the music and managing the distribution of the music to end customers via retailers. Retailers incurred staffing and real estate and costs. In contrast to this, Napster was able to bring together over 60 Million users who would share their collection of music to the remainder of the user base. In doing so, the reach and range of music distribution was significantly raised. Strong Community Feeling, word of mouth effect and High customer awareness led to low cost of marketing for Napster.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study 1

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Person-to-person or P2P networking, Sean Fanning, an 18-year-old student with the nickname ‘the Napster’, was intrigued by the challenge of being able to enable his friends to ‘see’ and share between their own personal record collections. Napster.com did not actually hold any music on its files – but every day millions of swaps were made by people around the world exchanging their music collections. Napster opened a door for many others to reinvent similar software’s or technologies successful iPod personal MP3 player they opened a site called iTunes which offered users a choice of thousands of tracks for download at 99c each. This allowed over 1 billion songs to legally be purchased and downloaded…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The courts ordered Napster to stop allowing users to download copyrighted material. Napster subsequently shut down its service and filed bankruptcy, giving rise to peer-to-peer computing. The major recording companies filed a lawsuit against two companies offering peer-to-peer software in their pursuit to stop music sharing. In April 2003, the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles ruled in favor of Grokster Ltd and Streamcast Networks, Inc. because they did not have the ability to control or monitor how the users of their product were exchanging files (Vance, 2003). This ruling has since been overturned by the US Supreme Court. The parties settled the lawsuit and both services agreed to stop offering the free file sharing software (RIAA,…

    • 2646 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Two main recording artists Metallica and Dr. Dre have taken actions against Napster. They accused over three hundred thousand people on Napster for music piracy, which means they are stealing songs. There is a huge difference between sharing and stealing. All Napster did was to allow people share songs from one another. At some time somebody had to have bought that recording artists C.D., or it would not have ended up on the Napster network. People who have C.D. burners take it into their own hands to burn them. Burning songs from Napster onto your own C.D. is a copyright infringement, but Napster did not provide C.D. burners in their software the computers people own do. On Napster's web page, there is a warning about the copyright infringement laws. Recording artists feel they are being cheated, but record sales went up 2% since last…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company V. Napster Case

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Napster is a very popular web site that allowed many users to share music files. The way that Napster shared music files is through peer-to-peer sharing. These files that are called MP3’s (Motion Picture Expert Group 1, Audio Layer 3: an algorithm that compresses digital music files) were shared between registered users anonymously at no cost to the users. The format of MP3’s reduces the files allowing users to quickly and easily share these files. MP3’s can also be copied multiple times without damaging the quality of the file. Napster allows registered users to download a “Music Share” software that will allow peer-to-peer sharing of the MP3 files. There is a large hub that all registered users had access to through the music sharing software where Napster would manage the download process.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Steal This Mp3

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With so many Internet users currently sharing music, The Recording Industry Association of America considers downloading music from websites stealing. Yet people who are downloading mp3 for free think it’s not because they are downloading shared copies of mp3’s. Companies like Sony sell computers with ripping and burning capabilities, MP3 players, and other devices that gain much of their appeal from music sharing. So what is theft? Treating customers like thieves is a certain recipe for failure.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The music recording industry is in trouble. For several years now, sales of new and popular music have steadily declined and show no sign of changing. The record companies are quick to blame the growing popularity of the Internet; music is being traded in a digital form online, often anonymously, with the use of file-sharing programs such as Morpheus, KaZaA, and Imesh, to name a few. The RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) succeeded in disbanding the pioneer Internet file-sharing program, Napster, but is facing confrontation with similar programs that are escaping American copyright laws. While there is an obvious connection between declining popular music sales and increasing file sharing, there is more going on than the RIAA wants to admit. I will show that the recording companies are overpricing their products, and not sufficiently using the Internet as an opportunity to market and sell their products. I shall begin by describing in greater detail the problem that the recording companies are facing, as well as the growing epidemic of online music trading. From there, I will show the correlation between the two and describe the other factors affecting record sales, and how these trends could be turned around to help the industry.…

    • 5602 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With the advent and common usage of the Internet beginning in the late 1990’s, piracy became a major concern for music producers and artists. The website Napster was a pioneer in this illegal trade. Originally created by brothers John and Shawn Fanning and their friend Sean Parker, Napster posted MP3 files for free download of popular recording artists. Sean Parker, of…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Napster is a good example of how these intellectual property rights are being compromised on the Internet. Napster is a simple, yet sophisticated program created by a young college student named Shawn Fanning that enables users to anonymously swap and share audio files known as MP3s. During its infancy, Napster only had approximately 3,000 users. At that time, Napster could probably have been protected by the Audio Home Recording Act, "which gives consumers the right to create and transfer digital music for noncommercial purposes" (Gurly). Since that time, according to Chris Sherman, writer for the magazine Online, "Napster has become the most successful new Web technology ever by gaining more than 25 million registered users in just over a year or existence." At this point, however, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is quite unhappy with Napster 's existence and its service. They believe "the fact that millions of users can share songs with one another is a violation of copyright and constitutes outright ‘theft ' of intellectual property" (Sherman). The RIAA won a lawsuit under this argument against Napster in early 2001, so the program may go offline unless a compromise is reached.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nipping At Napster

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some people think that it is perfectly fine to download music for free, but the majority of people know that it is illegal to do so. Joe Elliott works in the music industry and states “Napster is a form of theft. No doubt about it.” in a response to letter asking about how artist feel about it. Most people would argue and say that the artist do not care about how their music gets out because even with cutting the middleman out they still get their fair share of pay. The truth is most artist make their music thinking of their fans and try to use their platforms to influence people in a positive ways. It is nowhere near fair that artist are being robbed for their work when they try to help people express themselves through a feeling, a form of art like dance, or part of…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas some individuals agree with downloading music being a form to promote artists and expand their fan base, most can stand with downloading music being a form of theft. Sophia, a student from Palmdale High, speaks out in favor of the issue by pointing out that free downloading “does not affect the profits that music industries make”. While this may be true for the music industry as a whole, individual artists do suffer significant financial losses from websites like Napster. At these sites millions can instantly download music illegally without any consequences. Users glorify Napster ,along with other sites similar, to the fact that Napster is perfect for expulsion of artists. A Palmdale High Student, Cassandra Brito, states, “Free downloads…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The process of being cool

    • 708 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People, who produce this music online, put in excess amounts of energy, time, and money while getting nothing in return. In source 4, the artist asks, “do you think about the days, weeks, months- maybe even years- that we have to put into writing, practicing, recording, mixing, and distributing that song?” The frustrations of being taken advantage of are evident in this source. Artists want to share their music but cannot be giving it away for free. This is their living and it would be impossible for them to make any profit if everyone is just took part in online piracy. When people participate in online piracy, they are stealing work that has taken many hours and much money to produce.…

    • 708 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays