Preview

Naturalism Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4440 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Naturalism Research Paper
Naturalism is, ironically, a controversial philosophy. Our modern civilization depends totally for its existence and future survival on the methods and fruits of science, naturalism is the philosophy that science created and that science now follows with such success, yet the great majority of humans (at least 90% of the U.S. population) believe in the antithesis of naturalism--supernaturalism. Our culture persistently indulges and celebrates supernaturalism, and most people, including some scientists, refuse to systematically understand naturalism and its consequences. This paper proposes to show that naturalism is essential to the success of scientific understanding, and it examines and criticizes the claims of pseudoscientists and theistic …show more content…
You now have hypothetical knowledge, but that is not good enough, because you are still skeptical of the results. So you test your hypotheses, and when corroborated, you now possess reliable knowledge, which is as close as humans can get to the truth in a natural world, but it is close enough. Later in this paper, I will demonstrate that naturalism is a methodological necessity in the practice of science by scientists, and an ontological necessity for understanding and justifying science by scientists. But I can discuss the general justification for the essentiality of naturalism in science now. The alternative to naturalism is supernaturalism, and unless naturalism is true and supernaturalism false, empiricism--comprehending reality solely by sensory experience--is not sufficient to comprehend reality; rationalism--the use of logic in reasoning--is not sufficient to understand reality; and skepticism--the questioning and evaluation of one's knowledge system and beliefs--is not sufficient to arrive at reliable knowledge of reality. Simply put, empiricism, rationalism, and skepticism--the foundations of science--will not be epistemologically reliable unless naturalism is either true or assumed to be true, since by not doing so, part of reality …show more content…
Some may suggest that my defense of science is an example of scientism. Scientism has been defined as "the belief that science, especially natural science, is much the most valuable part of human learning--much the most valuable part because it is much the most authoritative, or serious, or beneficial" (Sorell, 1991, p. 1). I would say that this definition is an overstatement, especially since it is exactly what I believe, and I am not scientistic. Scientism is, rather, the belief that science is the only valuable part of human learning, that knowledge comes only through the methods of investigation available to science, that science by itself gives us reliable answers to questions about morality and epistemology, that science enables us to solve all serious human problems, and that science will give us a comprehensive and unified understanding of the meaning of the universe. I believe none of these. Science may illuminate serious ethical, epistemological, aesthetic, and metaphysical problems and suggest solutions, but, in the end, many human problems must find solutions in human philosophies, even if the answers are unsatisfactory for a variety of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    SCIE1000 Philosophy Essay

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alan Chalmers, a British-Australian philosopher of science and best-selling author, suggests a common view of science by which scientific knowledge is ‘reliable’ and ‘objectively proven’ knowledge that is derived from facts of experience, experimental procedure and observations. This essay aims to discuss the problems that are likely to be highlighted by a Popperian hypothetico-deductivist when confronted with Chalmers’ adverse views on the validity of the scientific method. Both Alan Chalmers and Karl Popper - renowned for the development of hypothetico-deductivist/falsificationist account of science - represent the two major, contradictory theories (falsification and induction) regarding the functionality of science. I will be structuring my argument around these two models and the several complications surrounding the inductivist’s account of science that are seemingly solved by Popper’s alternative.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine life as we know it without science. This may be hard to do, considering that scientific technology is now a perpetual symbol of modern-day life. Everything we see, everything we touch, and everything we ingest—all conceived of scientific research. But how did it come to be this way? Was it not only centuries ago that science began to surpass the authority of the church? Between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, natural philosophers, now known as scientists, founded a new world view on science, which was previously based on the Bible and classic philosophers like Aristotle and Ptolemy. Both people connected their natural studies directly to God and the Bible, creating ideas like a geocentric earth. With time and new ideas, scientists managed to develope methods for creating and discovering things in nature, and with enough resources and patronage, were able to answer asked and unasked questions. Science, however, was not supported by everyone, and had to face many challenges to achieve the power it maintains in today’s world. Due to the strong authority that politics, religion, and common social order controlled in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, science was subjectively held in the hands of those who could utilize it or reject it.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I have no idea, it doesn’t make sense. He wasn’t good for anything anyways, its better now that he’s gone and out of the way.”, Curley responds.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments against the Natural Knowledge of God states the existence of God are not convincing, and perhaps very questionable whether an analysis of the world and of ourselves leads us to a preliminary knowledge of God. In our studies we once thought is was the plan and purpose of a divine mind in nature was in fact only a pattern some falsely read into nature with our human minds (Guthrie, Shirley Caperton 47)…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a scientific realist’s perspective, the scientific pursuit of truth further gives rise to genuine knowledge of the natural world, thus entailing epistemic realism and accordingly yielding the knowledge of truth about the objective reality investigated by scientists (Sankey, 2008). Epistemic realism characterises scientific realism, insisting that scientific knowledge is not restricted to the observational level, but also unobservable aspects of reality as well. On the contrary, contemporary versions of constructive empiricist deny the possibility of having rationally justified belief or knowledge about unobservable aspects of the world (Sankey,…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Natural Essay

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Roy, will you be the best there ever was in the game?” “That’s right.” (p.33) In The Natural, by Bernard Malamud, Roy Hobbs intends to be the best baseball player there ever was, breaking all of the records and enjoying the fame that came with it. He started playing for the Knights under the management of Pop Fisher as a rookie at the age of 34. His career started slowly but eventually he became the most liked and most watched player in all of baseball leading his team from last place in the standings to the best team in baseball. In 1984, Mark Johnson took the book and produced it into a movie. While there were plenty of small differences, a few major changes were made. These changes ultimately led us from the book where we didn’t like him or want him to succeed to the movie where he was loved and people wanted him to succeed. Two differences in the movie from the book that gave a different mood and an extremely different outcome are Roy’s childhood in the movie and Roy’s relationship with Iris.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Skepticism is essential to the pursuit of the scientific method. However, a balanced use of it is also necessary. Too much skepticism would make it very difficult for a scientist to arrive at a conclusion. Too little skepticism and said scientist would agree too readily with a proposed conclusion. Charles Lewontin, in his book The Doctrine of DNA: Biology as Ideology, lays out a case for why it is reasonable to be skeptical of science.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Natural Essay

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A dynamic character is a character who undergoes an important inner change, suck as a change in attitude or personality. A dynamic character in the book The Natural by Bernard Malamud is Roy Hobbs. From the beginning of the book to the end, the reader sees a major change in Roy's attitude and in the way Roy sees himself. Through the majority of the novel, Roy seems to think his only purpose in the world is to play baseball, break records, and win the pennant for Pop Fisher. By the end of the book Roy's focus shifts from being the best in the game to taking care of Iris Lemon and their coming child.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of naturalism stating the environment changes people is true. Naturalism is the surrounding of one’s life changing due to certain shifts in their life. Although people might argue and say naturalism is not about the environment but actions and activity one has, naturalism is not based on things as they appear but revolves around the deterministic view on a character’s life. This essay will step into three different points of naturalism and break down the understanding and comprehension of naturalism. Naturalism and the environment changes people because they affect our brain, shape who we are, and determine the life of many others.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Over the years, the nature of reality, knowing, thinking and believing has constituted puzzling issues which epistemology attempts to grapple with. Issues cutting across what can we know, what is the nature and scope of human knowledge, what can be known with certainty, how do we acquire knowledge, how can we know what is when we come across it, what can be left to faith or opinion to decide, as well as the proper source of knowledge preoccupied the philosophical and at the same time, the epistemological thought of philosophers. In this connection, different schools of thought have come to limelight notably among them are scepticism, rationalism, and empiricism.…

    • 4236 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a few views that have altered since my movement out of naturalism. One appeal in naturalism is the value of continual cause and effect pattern. The unbreakable linkage of cause and effect is how the world is described. The universe is considered a closed system that cannot be reorder (Sire, 2009, _). In chemistry, the term ‘closed system’ refers to an experiment that cannot lose or gain from outside the system. A closed system is considered an idea situation to conduct experiment and any other system would be unreliable and doubtful. By depend on cause and effect patterns, science is a product of observing the consistent order of the universe. There was predictability that if these two compounds were combined, then this compound would…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The evolution theory of Charles Darwin will continue being stronger compared to the traditional religious beliefs of creation. Among the many diverse issues in the society with intense controversy, the ongoing conflict between religious segments and the world of science is underscored. In this view, the following argumentative essay will scrutinize this debate between creationism and evolution to show how the later holds more weight and worth believing. Evolution theory has proved that the creationist beliefs, as well as their denials, tend to defy logic, reality and science. Science can be considered as an intelligent understanding of phenomena while religion is more of a blind belief. Reality has been proven to occur in the thinking patterns of many scientists, to lesser or greater degree of many creationists and others that do not…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The natural sciences are an area of knowledge which have significantly impacted our perception of the natural world. The natural sciences denote subjects such as physics, biology and chemistry. From my perspective, the natural sciences are an area of knowledge independent of culture. In order to reach this conclusion, I examined the scientific method. The scientific method is a method used to distinguish a science from a pseudo science ( fake science). According to the traditional picture of the scientific method, science is divided into 5 steps known as inductivism.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural science has undeniably influenced the process of creating understanding, or perhaps supplanted it; by allowing or positivist methods to dictate how scholars in the humanities were to engage with their objects of study, the goal of understanding was exchanged for one of mindless gathering of facts, (Szondi 4) the fostering of a “spiritless empiricism,” as Wilhem Danzel puts it. While hollow, “at least [it] always [furnishes] genuine material, which can then be animated, whereas ingenious talk of things that are entirely non-existent [is] of no use whatsoever: ex nihilo nihil fit.”…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics