Nature Vs. Nurture

Nature vs. Nurture Nature vs Nurture: A thrilling debate that has excited the minds of many psychologists, neurologists and even many average people. The debate on nature vs. nurture, more specifically, how does compassion affect the way people act. In this debate nature vs nurture are mostly pertaining to how behavior is affected. Nature is recognized as what is being passed down that is affecting the behavior of a certain species such as genetics. Nurture is recognized to be environmental factors that have affected the certain species behavior. Both, nature and nurture, affect living organisms in different ways and sometimes in very similar ways. The final product of these affects can affect how people tend to behave. Compassion is directly linked to nurture but indirectly connected to nature. The ideas of having someone give love and compactions are something that everyone wishes to have. These are in the high Arche of needs.( "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs.") Located at number three, you can see that out of all the eight needs they number three is where they’re located. Compassion is more of a nurture
The way you are brought up can be the most influential aspect of a person and how they develop. These things affect the little things that make us stand out and make us blend in as well. How much compassion you obtain can change the outcome of your life. If you are around a compassionless home while you’re starting to develop, you will most likely be more susceptible to being compassionless because that’s what you’ve been brought up with. (."Nature vs. Nurture: New Science Stirs Debate.”). For example, people who smoke are more susceptible to smoking because they have grown up with it. We are brainwashed to think it is okay for us to do these things because of what we see. In the novel, Frankenstein, the monster develops his angry behavior from reading and being able to observe the humans around