Preview

Nazi's Far-Right

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
473 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nazi's Far-Right
Here’s were we disagree with Glenn Beck on the characterisation of the Nazi’s as ‘Far-Right’
==================================================================
Having viewpoint grounded in historic fact has it’s advantages and Glenn Beck uses this to good effect. However, there is one contention that he needs to address to keep with logical reality. Many a time he has asserted that certain Nazi groups are a vestige of the Far-Right with allusions to it being some sort of European model. With all due respect, the measurement of any logical construct has to be vested with a consistent metric to make sense and this metric cannot change by geographic location.

It should be axiomatic that the constructs of our life have a basis in logic and reality. Confusion reigns when these elements are missing. The subject at hand is very good example, there are those that prefer
…show more content…
This is why governments maintain weight and measurement standards in controlled environments, since each of these metrics have to be clearly defined for everyone. Such is the case with the political spectrum. One cannot arbitrary place a particular ideology at some point with a rational basis for doing so.

The origins of Left and Right began under the auspices of support for a monarchy during the time of the French revolution. Clearly this is no longer the case and it only makes sense to set the metric to a standard of modern times. This metric should have a basis in the dictionary definitions of the various mainstream ideologies of the day.

In general terms, the Right is considered to be the Conservative imbued with the principles of individual liberty, free enterprise, private property ownership and limited government while the Left is considered to be Socialistic in nature, vested in the principles of Collective or Groups rights, Socialism and unlimited

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The description of a set of beliefs as "liberal" or "conservative" is a task that, in history, has changed in its requirements and protocol. We would now consider beliefs to be conservative that were at the onset of the American experiment considered liberal. Free markets, limited government, and federalism were ideas that were ridiculed throughout most of the civilized countries of the west up until recent history. On the other hand, what we would now consider to be modern liberalism can’t well be described in a similar fashion: Hobbes’ style of conservatism and its antidemocratic and autocratic impulses, while always the end result of collectivist tendencies such as modern liberalism, don’t translate completely into FDR’s style of governance and the Left’s penchant for social democracy (though Hobbes would appreciate the control that central planning entails). Modern liberalism, like modern conservatism, can be traced to a form of liberal thought. In modern liberalism’s case, though, it is rooted in continental European thought such as French Revolution radicalism and subsequent collectivist ideologies (devoted more to equality and a concept of "change") than in conservatism’s bedrock, more individualist Anglo Saxon thought. Thus, when referring to "conservative" and "liberal", the reference will be to the modern manifestations of such.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gasland can be examined using the social conflict theory of socialism. There are three main theories of socialism: structural functional, social conflict, and symbolic interaction. The reason for social conflict being the best candidate for Gasland is because it shows how much power, wealth, and prestige the government can hold among the U.S. population.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Share your findings with the rest of the group . . .  Collectivism and The New Right Collectivism & the New Right are political responses to the role of government in our society  They also consider whether the government should provide welfare support …

    • 933 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    New right are a group of Conservatives where views diverge from those of traditional conservatives. New right came famous under the rule of Margaret Thatcher who was Prime Minister from 1979-1990 and they are known for having very right-winged policies. To me, David Cameron is a New Right leader and in this essay there will be reasons on why I personally believe that David Cameron is actually a New Right leader…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Uk Coalition Gov

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Before the coalition, the Lib Dems were seen as a left-wing party, and the Conversatives, a right-wing party. However under the coalition government both parties have had to make compromises in order for the coalition to work. I am going to talk about to what extent both parties have had to revise their traditional ideologies. Both parties believe that by being part of the coalition they are fighting for their cause, but this may not be true, with both parties having to make compromises.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For instance, the new left demanded freedom and peace now by taking immediate action while the new rights took the approach of “patience”, thinking past the present and how the present affects the future. The new left sought power in the form of actions and not so much its organizations. While the new right believed that power came from a position, political office, or a job. Unlike the liberal, the conservatives did not suffer from a generation age gap. The younger conservatives respected the older conservatives and their ideas. The younger conservatives seek the older conservatives for guidance and help. Conservatives were directed towards the white-collar employed. Anticommunist was a highly important stance for the conservative party in the 1960s. Conservatives are often described as the party that goes the old-fashion way. Conservatives also strongly believed in the idea that since everyone was different this meant that everyone should have different rewards and…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that political parties now actually have more political differences within the parties than between them this can be argued due to the fact that both the Democrat and the Republican parties have their conservative and liberal/moderate wings. For example the Democratic Party is divided into groupings such as the southern conservative Democrats with conservative views on most social, economic and foreign issues whereas the northern liberal democrats such as the late Kennedy, with liberal views on policy issues, and from 1980s the ‘New Democrats’ as well as Gore’s Democratic Leadership Council, highlighting a variety of differences within a political party in America. Similarly the Republicans have also been internally divided, having a variety of splits to do with social and fiscal conservatives, compassionate conservatives and neo conservatives. Therefore the Republican Party is often split between its more conservative and more moderate wings of the party.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the United States, the Republican Party is generally considered to be the party of conservatism. This has been the case since the 1960s, when the conservative wing of that party consolidated its hold, causing it to shift permanently to the right of the Democratic Party. The most dramatic realignment was the white South, which moved from 3-1 Democratic to 3-1 Republican between 1960 and 2000.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is very important not to confuse these ideas with contemporary definitions of "Liberal" and "Republican." Classical liberals emphasize individual rights above all, and believe government's only valid purpose is to enable individuals to be as free as they can be. They are suspicious of arguments about the good of the group, fearing restrictions on their ability to seek the good life as they define it. "Small-r" republicans, meanwhile, can also be found all over the American political map. Etymology gets us quickly to republicanism's core: "republic" comes from the Latin phrase res publica, "public thing," and indeed republicans tend to imagine the "body politic" to be a real entity. Citizens form that body together, and our actions make it healthy or sick. Where liberals believe the self-interested, rights-bearing individual going her own way is the democratic ideal, republicans argue that self-government can only work if citizens develop specific civic virtues, and learn to act in a public-spirited way. The idea at the heart of republicanism, then, is virtue. On the right, advocates of a greater role for religion in American public life believe spiritual values will make the country strong; on the left, supporters of big increases in education spending believe the public schools can and must build responsible citizens if American democracy is to succeed.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical liberalism dates back to the seventeenth century and lasted until the nineteenth century. This was during the time that kings ruled because God selected the king’s family to shepherd His people. Classical liberalism opposed the “divine rights of Kings” (PP Classical Liberalism) and wanted to maximize the rights of the people and minimize the power if the state. It was during this time that liberalists like John Locke, Adam Smith, Jean-Jacques…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In today's society, most people are unable to explain the differences between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. In fact, the two parties' ideologies seem to be very much alike; and therefore, people tend to believe that a Republican candidate and a Democratic candidate running for the same office will not make a large difference from one another. Furthermore, both Democrats, the supposedly liberal party, and Republicans, the supposedly conservative party, have been appointed to the highest office, the President of the United States of America. In most cases, the President has been effective in building notable progress in our nation's growth, regardless of the political party that they belong to. Hence, most people believe that the two parties are similar enough that they are practically the same. Upon closer examination into the history of the Democratic and the Republican parties, we are able to determine that the political philosophies from which they originate have completely opposing ideologies.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pathos Analysis

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the third paragraph, there were many allusions used to credibility and historical context, such as “New World”, “Colonists”, and “Dust Bowl of the 1930s”. These examples are all related to some time period in which “some of the worst abuses have been carried out by ‘people who root themselves in ideas rather than places.’” Another strategy the author utilizes in his response is ethos. This is displayed by the way that Sanders discusses topics such as “bigotry” and the division between “tolerance” and “intolerance” to point out the morality and value behind his argument, also known as ethics. Finally, Sanders demonstrates parallelism through his effective organization of words, sentences, and paragraphs.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Republicanism emphasized an active participation in public life by economically independent citizens. Republicans held that only those with property were virtuous-the willingness to subordinate personal interest to public good. Liberalism was quite the opposite. Foner writes, “Government, he wrote, was formed by mutual agreement among equals… In this ‘social contract’ men surrendered a part of their right to govern themselves in order to enjoy the benefits of the rule of law.” (Foner 153) Both…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Third Reich

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Nazi rise to power brought an end to the Weimar Republic, a parliamentary democracy established in Germany after World War I. Following the appointment of Adolf Hitler as chancellor on January 30, 1933, the Nazi state (also referred to as the Third Reich) quickly became a regime in which Germans enjoyed no guaranteed basic rights. After a suspicious fire in the Reichstag (the German Parliament), on February 28, 1933, the government issued a decree which suspended constitutional civil rights and created a state of emergency in which official decrees could be enacted without parliamentary confirmation.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Psychology Unit 1 Summary

    • 2722 Words
    • 11 Pages

    • He raised questions about peoples abilities to commit and justify anti-social or inhumane acts commanded by someone with ‘legitimate authority’ such as Hitler…

    • 2722 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays