Preview

Negligence Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1174 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Negligence Paper
Negligence Paper Ann Fairvalley University of Phoenix HCS/ 478

Negligence Paper

Imagine waking up in the recovery room from being sedated for a procedure in which one of your limbs has been amputated. While in recovery you are in and out of consciousness. Finally after being in recovery for 2 hours you are taken to a step down unit to recover and receive teaching and therapy. After getting settled into bed you gets the guts to throw back you sheets and take a look where there was once a left leg. To your horror your left leg is there and your right leg is not! “The Joint Commission considers wrong site surgery to be a sentinel events which is defined as "an unexpected occurrence involving death or serious physical or psychological injury, or the risk thereof. Serious injury specifically includes loss of limb or function” (Dillon. 2008.).” This was an all too familiar of a situation for one Mr. Joseph Benson a 62-year-old diabetic with circulation problems that required a leg amputation. In this paper I plan to explore the legal implications in regards to the differences between negligence, gross negligence and malpractice. I will also explore some rational as to why union problems and/or nursing shortages could have been the cause of this disaster. Lastly I will describe the importance of documentation in regards to potential negligence as if I was the nurse involved with Mr. Benson’s care. I will briefly describe my ethical principles, which would guide this practice and how I would document the case to satisfy ethical and legal requirements.

“Negligence as defined by Black’s Law Dictionary (1979) and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO, 2002) is the “failure to use such care as a reasonably prudent and careful person would use under similar circumstances.” It is the predominant theory of liability in medical malpractice litigation (King, 1986) (Weld. Garmon. Bibb. 2009.).” During



References: Dillon, K. (2008). Time out: an analysis. AORN Journal, 88(3), 437. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Sharfman, B. S. (2006). Being Informed Does Matter: Fine Tuning Gross Negligence Twenty Plus Years After Van Gorkom. Business Lawyer, 62(1), 135-160. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Weld, K., & Garmon Bibb, S. (2009). Concept analysis: malpractice and modern-day nursing practice. Nursing Forum, 44(1), 2-10. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Under the Doctrine of Corporate Negligence the hospital owes certain “duties” directly to the patient, which cannot be delegated to the medical staff. Under the Doctrine of Corporate Negligence Misericordia Community Hospital, owes a duty to its patients to refrain from any act which will cause foreseeable harm to others even though the nature of that harm and identity of the harmed person or harmed interest are unknown at the time of the act (westlaw citation). The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Thompson v. Nason Hospital classified the hospital’s duties into four categories. 1) a duty to use reasonable care in the maintenance of safe and adequate facilities and equipment; 2) a duty to select and retain only competent physicians; 3) a duty to oversee all persons who practice medicine within its walls as to patient care; and 4) a duty to formulate, adopt and enforce adequate rules and policies to ensure quality care for the patients. The hospital also failed to adhere to its own bylaw provisions and to the Wisconsin statues related to medical…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the nursing field in recent years has had an increasing concern with legal and ethical dilemmas in clinical decision-making. In nursing there law has major impacts through a wide range of issues. Being healthcare professionals it is highly important for that professional to know the ways the laws regulate their scope. There are issues from clinical negligence to resource allocation. The people that work in healthcare are accountable…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    X is guilty of negligent homicide. According to the Model Penal Code 2.02 (d), “A person acts negligently with respect to a material element of an offense when he should aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the material element exists or will result from his conduct”. Therefore, this is a negligent homicide because X BELIEVES that X can heal the sick by killing them. X did not killed Y by knowing that Y cannot be brought back to life. X have a lack of awareness since X has never actually performed spiritual healing before. If X previously has failed to bring a sick cult back to life, it would be relevant to my answer, in this case X would have an awareness that spiritual healing cannot bring a suck cult back to life.…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Monico, E., Kulkarni, R., & Calise, A. (2013). The Criminal Prosecution of Medical Negligence. Retrieved from http://www.ispub.com/IJLHE/5/1/5237…

    • 1496 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Term Paper Health Care Law

    • 2280 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Legal Risk Management process is nothing new for the health care industry nor is it a new social or legal ordained program. In fact as early as four thousand years ago the Babylonian Code implemented severe punishment to physicians that caused death or harm to patient through their own malpractice. Law wrote: “should a physician operate on a man with a bronze lancet and cause a man’s death, they shall cut off his fingers”. In the 1970’s began a large upward movement in malpractice suits creating a crisis situation for physicians and the health care industry as whole. As a result of these huge numbers of dollars in law suits the…

    • 2280 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fremgen, Bonnie F. "Chapter 6/ Professional Liability and Medical Malpractice." Medical Law and Ethics. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Julie Levin Alexander, 2012. 133+. Print.…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical malpractice lawsuits are startlingly common and result from a number of reasons. Doctors and medical specialists can make medical errors, missed diagnoses, drug errors and miss test results (Lovenberg, 2015). Doctors can also make surgical errors and anaesthesia mistakes (Lovenberg, 2015). Unfortunately, all of these failures can result in serious injury and often death. Malpractice tort law is a Constitutional right and provides a means for individuals who have suffered from medical negligence to receive reparation for compensatory damages (Lau & Johnson, 2014). However, defendants in these numerous cases disagree with the tort laws and have successfully and unsuccessfully argued for reform…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tort Law

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evaluate and discuss the potential liability (negligence or other torts) of the various parties in the scenario involving but not limited to Bobby, ACE Sports, the nurse, the surgeon and City General. (Avoid simply restating the facts/scenario. Incorporate them into your discussion.)…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical malpractice is a category of the negligence tort in which medical professionals commit negligence (Lau & Johnson, 2014). Therefore, medical malpractice is a specific type of negligence. The following must happened in order to make a claim of medical malpractice: the duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff must be established, proof that this duty was breached must be shown, proof the defendant’s actions caused this breach and lastly the damages sustained by the plaintiff must be shown (Lau & Johnson, 2014). Medical professionals have a duty to perform medical care to their patients. If an error is made during their medical care that causes injury or death to a patient, their duty has been breach. Proof of this error and that it was the doctor’s responsibility must be shown. The injury or death must be explained as a result of the doctor’s…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical malpractice and health care reforms have become major issues, especially in the current volatile political climate of the Obama administration. Add to it the rising costs of healthcare and diminishing coverage for most individuals. In such demanding situations, if you become a victim of medical malpractice, it is time you stand up, be counted and know your rights. Since every state has its own interpretation of consumer medical malpractice rights, it is recommended you consult an attorney or lawyer well versed in this field.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Involuntary Manslaughter

    • 2867 Words
    • 12 Pages

    A doctor’s negligent treatment of his patient resulted in death. ‘Gross Negligence’ was the basis for criminal liability.…

    • 2867 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    8. The other side of the argument: Nurses make far less errors than other medical practitioners…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence is comparable to carelessness. According to Guido (2010), negligence is “a deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would use in a particular set of circumstances” (p. 92). There are four fundamental elements to a negligence claim and the rules in a tort law require each element be demonstrated for a claim to be honored in court. They are 1) legal duty to the patient, 2) breach of legal duty to the patient, 3) injury caused by the breach, and 4) damages. Every staff member involved in this case had a legal duty to the patient to provide safe and quality care, to include the amputation mishap of amputating the wrong leg. The most important question is “would a reasonable surgeon in the same situation have amputated the wrong leg in this particular set of circumstances?” The second element to consider is whether or not there was a breach of legal duty to the patient. In this case, I think it is safe to conclude there was a breach of legal duty owed. The element of foreseeability was not regarded in any form when the duty owed to the patient was breached. The third element is causation. This element simply implies the answer to the question “was the injury caused by the breach of legal…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Medical Malpractice Law

    • 1983 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Malpractice Law Firm Jack H. Oldender & Associates explains the result of malpractice with the following: “ Medical malpractice occurs when a health care provider negligently inflicts an avoidable injury upon a patient. Under those circumstances, the patient has a right to file suit against the provider for money damages.” (Oldender)…

    • 1983 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Medical malpractice is defined as professional negligence by act or omission by a health care provider in which care provided deviates from accepted standards of practice in the medical community and causes injury or death to the patient, with most cases involving medical error” (Medical Malpractice).…

    • 2743 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays