Preview

Negligence: Tort and Reasonable Person

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6247 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Negligence: Tort and Reasonable Person
LAW

Torts 1 – Negligence: elements of liability

Objectives

The law of tort has already been mentioned in other topics in a comparative sense. After studying this topic you should be able to:

• discuss the nature of tort law;

• explain the various interests protected by tort law;

• describe the three essentials of the tort of negligence;

• apply the test of reasonable foreseeability in relation to the duty of care;

• explain the circumstances in which a duty of care arises when giving advice;

• explain the factors used to determine the breach of the standard of care;

• describe the ‘but for’ test of causation; and

• apply these principles of liability to factual situations.

A. Law of Torts

A ‘tort’ is a civil wrong which the law redresses by an award of damages. A ‘wrong’ is an infringement or violation of a person’s legal right by another. There are many torts, each relating to a different type of harm:

|Negligence: |careless causation of injury to person, damage to property or economic loss |
|Defamation: |damage to reputation |
|Nuisance: |conduct that interferes with a neighbour’s enjoyment of their property |
|Trespass: |to person (physical assault), to goods (unlawful entry onto property) to goods |
| |(interference in a person’s use of their goods) |

In this Topic we will focus on the tort of negligence, which is a failure to take reasonable care towards another person which results in that person suffering harm. There is no need for the plaintiff to prove that harm was intended by the defendant – the essence of the action is that insufficient care was taken, and that that resulted in harm. Negligence can also be defined as the doing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Have you ever followed a court case and been astonished at the outcome and the damages awarded in the case? I believe we have all heard about cases where the plaintiff is awarded a very large sum of money for a case that appears not to warrant the award. Most of these scenarios take place in cases where the tort law applies. According to authors Kubasek, Brennan and Browne (2009), tort law is defined as injury that to a person or their property. Tort law is primarily a state law and stipulations can vary. Tort law was put in place to encourage civility, discourage people and companies from private retaliation and to compensate innocent people who are injured due to the wrongful act of a person or company. According to The Legal Environment of Business A Critical Thinking Approach, there are different types of damages awarded in relation to tort cases. These damages are nominal, which is usually awarded when the plaintiff has not suffered serious damage, compensatory, which include general and special damages, and punitive damages. Punitive damages are usually intended to punish defendants and often go beyond simply compensating the plaintiff. (Kubasek et al.,2009)…

    • 3046 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    TORT - A Tort is a civil wrong that is outside of Contract Law and arises out of a recognition that a person is responsible for their acts and omissions when dealing with others. The term "Tort" refers to a number of different laws such as nuisance, trespass and assault. Torts action generally compensates the individual for personal loss where the loss was caused by another person. It is based on Common Law.…

    • 9301 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    GBL 295 EXAM 2

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tort: A “Civil Wrong” Torts refer to a general classification covering civil causes of action…

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    LAWS1061 Exam Notes

    • 10741 Words
    • 47 Pages

    Definition of tort law concerns the obligations of persons living a crowded society to respect the safety, property and personality of their neighbours both as priori and ex post matters (compensation to those wrongfully harmed).…

    • 10741 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence consists of four different elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. In order to collect damages for the harm done the claimant must prove several things: the duty of care one owes to another, the standard of care expected by one from another, breach of the duty of care, and damage(s) either physical, emotional or monetary. In…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elements Of Negligence

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    Negligence is a failure to use reasonable care that results in harm to another party.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence on the other hand happens when harm or damage occur without intention, an example is someone who disobeys traffic laws and they result in an accident. While they were breaking the law, they did not intentionally mean for the accident to occur.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Reform in the Us

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tort law is a type of law that is designed to offer remedies to civil wrongs. Unlike contractual damages that occur, where responsibility is predetermined, tort law is designed for someone who is legally injured to be able to recover damages from the person who is deemed legally responsible, or liable for such injuries. Tort law is broken down into three main categories, negligence, strict liability, and intentional tort. In negligence tort one is accused of causing damages through their carelessness. After accusation of negligence the plaintiff must be able to show that the defendant had duty of care, and that a breach of duty had occurred that caused the damages. Strict liability is a legal doctrine that makes someone responsible for damages caused by their actions (e.g. product liability). Intentional tort is much like negligence, but instead of one causing damages by accident, there was reckless action or intent to cause the damages that occurred (e.g. assault, battery). Tort cases are based on common law, which is laws that have been developed through court decisions, i.e. precedent. However, in certain cases tort law can also be based on statutory law laid out by the legislature. It is up to the court to decide which rule should take a higher standing depending on the case.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brill Torts Outline

    • 12012 Words
    • 49 Pages

    a. Definition—(1) voluntary acts for the purpose of causing [the essential element of the tort] OR (2) voluntary acts with knowledge to a substantial certainty that [the essential element of the tort] will result.…

    • 12012 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A tort is basically a civil wrong. A civil wrong is an act, intentional or otherwise, the consequences of which include, but are not limited to damage to life or property, injury to a person, emotional or mental trauma, loss in reputation, etc. The injured party is entitled to get compensation from the party that was responsible for causing the injury.…

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Law: Tort Law

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tort laws are laws that usually involve state law and civil suits. State law are based on the legal premise that individuals are liable for the consequences of their conduct if it results in injury to others while civil suits are actions brought to protect an individual 's private rights. A body of rights, obligations, and remedies that is applied by courts in civil proceedings to provide relief for persons who have suffered harm from the wrongful acts of others (Tort Law, 2013). There are three elements in every tort action. For the first, the plaintiff must show that the defendant was under a legal duty to act in a certain fashion. Second, the plaintiff must show that the defendant failed to perform his or her duty. The…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Liability

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tort Law claims are basically know as a wrong doing. It is a civil law suit in which actions are brought to protect an individual’s private rights and say that they are harmed by someone else’s fault or wrongdoing. These law suits are typically settled for money, very large amounts as well. Hundreds to thousands of cases are dealing with a tort law claim.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Assignment

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The tort of negligence is a type of civil wrong where a contract does not exists between two parties and it is not a crime where punishment is the main objective to the offender. For example, trespass on private property or nuisance behaviour, these have no contract between the claimant and defendant and are dealt with under tort.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Commercial Law

    • 13694 Words
    • 55 Pages

    A tort is a civil wrong that is outside of contract law and arises out of recognition that a person is responsible for their acts and omissions when dealing with others.…

    • 13694 Words
    • 55 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law of Defamation

    • 6939 Words
    • 28 Pages

    A tort is a civil, as opposed to a criminal, wrong for which the normal remedy is a common law action for unliquidated damages.[1] As being a civil wrong Law of Tort deals usually only with private disputes between persons or organizations. When the criminal cases involve an action that is considered to be harmful to society as a whole. In civil law, a private party (e.g., a corporation or individual person) files the lawsuit and becomes the plaintiff. In criminal law, the litigation…

    • 6939 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics