Preview

Neo-Gramsci and the War in Afghanistan

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4752 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Neo-Gramsci and the War in Afghanistan
İZMİR UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS
Theories of International Relations
INSTRUCTER: Yrd. Doc. Dr. Balkan Devlen
SUBJECT: Neo-Gramsci and the War in Afghanistan

Sıla BOZ
Tolga YELMEN
Kamer AYDIN
Aydın Ersin YILMAZ

Introduction The 2001 invasion of Afghanistan has been seen as a ‘just war’ by the world opinion across the globe which represented a war targeting the terrorism and responsible terrorist organizations which are Taliban and Al-Qaida. In order to eliminate the ‘Islamic Terrorism’ by a Western-style democracy, international organizations which are under the dominancy of US have mobilized in order to justify the ‘war on terrorism’ with the help of the media campaigns. In this paper, it is going to be analyzed the US Afghanistan invasion according to the perspectives of neo-gramscianism. Neo-gramscianism finds both ‘neo-realism’ and ‘liberalism’ not sufficient to analyze the international politics since as R. W. Cox states that the every theory serves to somewhere and to an ideology as well as to a purpose and differs problem-solving theories which assume that states are not subject to fundamental changes but limited or incremental changes and all actions take place in a limited framework and critical theories that go beyond them to identify the origins and its developmental potential and historical phenomena. Thus, in this paper, the concept of hegemony, historic bloc and war and terror in the world order will be examined according to the Afghanistan occupation. Neo-Realist concept of hegemony includes one powerful state that dominates other with its military and economic capabilities. However, neo-gramscian approach is much wider than this definition which includes it is more than a state dominance, based on a consensual order that has dominance but dominance by a powerful state may be a necessary but not sufficient condition. In the historic bloc part, the historic bloc concept of Gramsci including international organizations will be examined at



References: Ahmed, Nafeez, M, 2009, Our Terrorists, New Internationalist Magazine, Issue 426: http://www.newint.org/features/2009/10/01/blowback-extended-version/ Cox, Robert, 2004, Beyond Empire and Terror: Critical Reflections on the Political Economy of World Order, New Political Economy, Vol 9. No.3 Gramsci, Antonio, Selection from the Prison Notebooks, ed Nowell Smith. London: Lawrence & Wishart (1971): 169-170 Iseri, Emre, Neo-Gramscian Analysis of US Hegemony Today, 2007: Özçelik, Sezai, Neo-realist and Neo-Gramscian hegemony in international relations and conflict resolution during the 1990 's, Ekonomik ve Sosyal Arastırmalar Dergisi, Güz 2005, 1:88-114 Strange, Susan, State and Markets, 1988, London: Printer Publishers Ufomba, Henry U., 2007, Collective Security of Hegemonic Security? A Neo-Gramscian Examination of American Role in Two Gulf Wars, Selected Works U.S Afghan civil society calls for just peace by Lisa Schirch, Common Ground News Service December 20th, 2011: http://uslaboragainstwar.org/article.php?id=25181 Afghan pipeline given go-ahead, BBC News, 30 May, 2002: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2017044.stm [ 1 ]. Op Cit, Moolakkattu, John S. (2009) ‘Robert W. Cox and Critical Theory of International Relations, International Studies, Sage Publications, Vol: 46:439, p. 440 [ 2 ] London: Lawrence & Wishart (1971): 169-170. [ 3 ]. Op Cit. Susan Strange, State and Markets. (1988) London: Printer Publishers: 25. [ 4 ]. Op Cit.Iseri, Emre, Neo-Gramscian Analysis of US Hegemony Today, 2007, p.3.. [ 6 ]. Op. Cit. U.S. Interests in the Central Asian Republics Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific of the Comittee of International Relations, House of Representatives, 1998, Second Session. [ 7 ]. Afghan pipeline given go-ahead, BBC News, 30 May, 2002 [ 8 ] [ 11 ]. Op Cit . A Concise History of U.S Foreign Policy, Joyce P. Kaufman, 2006, Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, Inc. P.34 [ 12 ] [ 13 ]. Iseri, Emre, Neo-Gramscian Analysis of US Hegemony Today, 2007, p. 3 [ 14 ] [ 16 ]. Op Cit. Cox, Robert (2004), Beyond Empire and Terror: Critical Reflections on the Political Economy of World Order, New Political Economy, Vol 9. No.3. p. 309. [ 17 ]. Afghan civil society calls for just peace by Lisa Schirch, Common Ground News Service December 20th, 2011 [ 18 ]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    A major debate that is being discussed both domestically and internationally is the involvement of the United States of America in international affairs. This debate includes the practicality of where the United States has intervened in foreign affairs, its right to intervene in the first place considering past mistakes and questionable leadership, and whether or not that foreign involvement is in the general public’s best interest. Obviously, the two sides of the debate refer to the ‘yes’ position, explained by Ivan Eland (as in yes, the United States should limit it’s global involvement) and also the ‘no’ position, backed by President Barack Obama (as in no, the United States should not limit it’s foreign involvement). Eland’s basis for his argument is that the United States has habitually overspent it’s treasure and overextended it’s military power to a point where we cannot keep pace economically and which could bring upon the demise of the American government as we know it. He also points out that continued foreign endeavors increases the risk of the United States being a target for terrorist attack. Obama’s vision is that The United States of America needs to re-establish its place as a world leader by maintaining an active foreign policy. Obama admits that mistakes have been made where international affairs are concerned, but that is a reason to fix those mistakes and step up as a suitable leader once more. Discussed later in the paper is my own point of view, which supports President Barack Obama and his plan for active engagement in foreign affairs, in a conservative and confidant manner.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hook, Steven W. 2008. U.S. Foreign Policy: The Paradox of World Power. 2nd ed. Washington DC: CQ Press.…

    • 2996 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Within this trajectory, the Soviet invasion of, and subsequent war with Afghanistan (1979-1989) stands out in particular as a lasting legacy of the Cold War. Globally, its outcome continues to plague international society in the current struggle between the Western liberal democratic order and Islamic extremism.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The fundamental changes caused by the war on the international scene and in the position of individual countries has entirely changed the political landscape of the world. A new alignment of political forces has arisen. The more the war recedes into the past, the more distinct becomes two major trends in postwar international policy, corresponding to the division of the political forces operating on the international arena into two major camps: the imperialist and anti-democratic camp, on the one hand, and the anti-imperialist and democratic camp, on the other. The principal driving force of the imperialist camp is the U.S.A. Allied with it are Great Britain and France. ... The imperialist camp is also supported by colony-owning countries, such as Belgium and Holland, by countries with reactionary anti-democratic regimes, such as Turkey and Greece, and by countries politically and economically dependent upon the United States, such as the Near Eastern and South American countries and China.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bajoria, Jayshree, Greg Bruno, and Eben Kaplan. "The Taliban in Afghanistan." Council on Foreign Relations. CFR, 6 Oct. 2011. Web. 23 Feb. 2013. .…

    • 3493 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    5. LaFeber, Walter. “The U.S. Rise to World Power”. Chapter 3. U.S. Foreign Policy. 2008. Pg. 51.…

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cassie Gilham 1/16/18 W4 Social Injustices in Afghanistan The past several years have not been kind to the people of Afghanistan. More than a decade of conflict and war has left Afghanistan defenseless against the infamous Taliban regime. The several different factions of Afghanistan found the power to unite against the Russians, overthrowing the Marxist Government in the early 1990’s but failed to establish a strong and united government due to cultural and religious differences. The Taliban took advantage of the Civil War raging in Afghanistan and took control of the country, ruling with brutality and force.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While historians have studied and commented on the many miscalculations committed during the war, very little has been written on flawed economic forecasts. Here are a few examples: Lincoln’s Secretary of the Treasury anticipated that the direct cost of the war North would be $240 million. This was almost 7% of the GDP…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Waltz, Kenneth N“The emerging structure of International Politics,”International Security, Vol 18, No 2 (November 1993)…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    9/11 World History

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Sovereign states became obsessed with being ‘secure’ and soon this idea became pandemic phenomena around world. The notion of security became contested among the American public and this drove the Bush administration to launch “The war on terror”. US tropes invaded Afghanistan to dispose of Al-Qaida. Soon the Taliban regime has been terminated and the Al-Qaida movement dispersed, abandoned training camps were destroyed (Rogers 2004). The “War on terror” appeared to be progressing with the enemy eliminated. However the America government sought a new technique to keep their nation terrorised beyond the pervious emphasis on Al-Qaida. Bush embraced a number of new rouge states that constituted an “axis of evil”. Those include North Korea, Iran and Iraq. All in the name of democracy which has become an integral part of US current international security…

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roskin, M., Berry, N. (2010). IR: The New World of International Relations (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Roskin, Michael, & Berry, Nicholas (2010). IR: The New World of International Relations (8th ed.). (Edition for Strayer University) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American Persona

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alan, Dobson and Steve, Mash. US Foreign policy since 1945. New York: Routledge Press. 2002. Print.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The inhabitants of Afghanistan mostly are Muslims. 80% of population belongs to Sunni Sect, 18% are Shias, and 2% are of Ismaili Sect. It seems that religion is the real force in Afghan’s life, permeating complete social structure.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    FICHE DE LECTURE: The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy, de Susan Strange…

    • 3423 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics