Preview

Never Let Me Go Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
822 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Never Let Me Go Research Paper
Medical dystopia and control has been present in the past and continues to be present in today’s world. Throughout history, unethical decisions have been made, and people’s lives have been put at risk “for the greater good” or to help other individuals get better. I believe that there is a very fine line between making sound medical decisions that follow rules and between honoring a patient’s wishes to help them or someone they love, but that the line is easily and often crossed.

The Hippocratic Oath is often thought of as a central part of becoming a doctor. The oath originates in ancient Greece, and contains the words “I will give no deadly medicine to anyone if asked, nor suggest any such counsel.” While this oath was used for hundreds of years, contents have caused conflict and debate in the medical world with cases of physician-assisted suicide. The most
…show more content…
The society probably began experimenting with cloning, and once that was accepted by society, explored the possibility of organ donation. Society members were probably okay with the existence of these clones because it meant that lives were being saved. And because the clones were separate from the rest of society, people didn’t fully perceive the process of getting their organ. The people didn’t see the clones grow up and make art and play sports just like any other children, and then develop relationships and fall in love just like any normal people. Because the clones were not part of every day society, it became easy to dehumanize them for personal gain. I think that had the rest of society seen the clones and understood their experiences, then clone organ donation may not have been accepted. But, as stated in the movie, people didn’t want to go back to a time of breast cancer and illness, so sometimes the sacrifice of a few lives is worth the saving of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    An analysis of Robert Schwartz “Autonomy, Futility, and the Limits of Medicine” reveals that physicians are not required to give patients treatment that has been proven to be effective, and they are not morally obligated to provide treatment that is not in-line with practice of medicine. Schwartz explains although our autonomy is respected, there are limitations on our request.…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emily Parks Alexander AP Language 11 March 2024 Medical Ethics Synthesis Science and medicine is the most rapidly advancing facet of human knowledge, and has been since the Scientific Revolution. Germ theory, anesthesia, and chemotherapy, among many other advancements in the medical practice, have improved the lives of many in a way that is difficult to quantify. Now that mankind has reached such a point in healthcare, where pain and illness can be more successfully mitigated than ever before, it is ever so important that ethical and humane treatment is prioritized. Informed consent, humanization of patients, and proper compensation of individuals who influence medical advancement, are the most crucial aspects of medical ethics regulations in today's world. Comparatively, informed consent and similar…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    And Then There Were None

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Every doctor takes a Hippocratic oath which is an oath to practice medicine ethically and honestly.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Hippocratic Oath contains a clause forbidding PAD and euthanasia that states, “I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.” This oath is taken when medical students officially become a doctor and it is mandated to follow the oath. Violating this act is destroying the foundation, which the physician was founded…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Once a resident has completed medical school and is on his or her way to become a physician they must pledge the Hippocratic Oath at graduation. This tradition started before Christ and it continues today. They have pledge to protect life by all means which includes artificial devices. How can a piece of paper change something that has been sworn since the beginning of time? Over time the oath has been revised to incorporate the new centuries and modern medicine. In spite of the oath DNR orders were introduced into medical facilities. The orders came into play for many reasons but the one that sticks out is terminally ill…

    • 2638 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    CJHS430

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    De Bord, J. (2014). ETHICS IN MEDICINE University of Washington School of Medicine. Retrieved from https://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/consent.html…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The hippocratic oath is an oath stating the responsibilities and proper conduct of a doctor. How would you feel if your doctor violated the hippocratic oath? The importance of the hippocratic oath is high and it plays a major role in a doctor’s career. Many promises are made when a doctor signs the oath and “the prohibition against killing stands as the first promise of self-restraint sworn by physicians to hippocratic oath” (“Guides: Bioethics: Hippocratic Oath, Modern…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When a doctor makes a decision for a patient in the name of health, the doctor is violating his or her autonomy. By autonomy, I mean the patient’s right to make medical decisions in terms of his or her health. Consider the following case: a patient has an advanced stage cancer that likely leads to death within a month, but the patient has a slim chance to survive through chemotherapy – which on its own is painful. If Collins was the doctor, he may mislead the patient, exaggerate the chances of survival, and convince the patient to opt for chemotherapy in the “best interest” of the patient’s health. But the patient’s “best interest” is subjective based on the perspective of the doctor or the patient.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have analyzed this situation from the perspective of a Utilitarian and my own viewpoints which go hand in hand. While others may see this as morally wrong and believe it goes against a physician’s ethical code of conduct, I completely disagree. I find the physicians who have the compassion to help these patients to relieve their suffering for once and for all to be truly inspiring even when so many people will pass judgements and disagree with their decision. As I stated before, doctors have very hard jobs and constantly have people judge and disapprove of their methods and treatments and I find it admirable that they still make the best decisions and take the patients best interests into consideration, even if that means assisting their…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “four principles of biomedical ethics of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice” (Cooper, 2012), however, this case shows autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence clashing. The patient and her family have the right to determine the patient’s care; yet, following the patient’s mother’s decision has the potential of causing harm to the…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As adults and human beings we have certain inalienable rights to make decisions regardless of whether they are deemed as poor or inappropriate by others. One must take into consideration the level of understanding and competence a patient possesses to assure they are informed of all options and repercussions; the other must be whether the individual is harming anyone other than themselves by making said decision. Once those issues have been taken into consideration there must be an allowance for an individual to make their own well-informed choice, even though as a practitioner, we may feel it is not in their best interest.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many different organizations like the World Health Organization or WHO, are concerned that the nature of the physician - patient relationship will be irrevocably altered for the worse if physicians are given a license to “kill”. (Young). However, advocates for physician assisted suicide like Margaret Battin will argue that physicians whom alone society has entrusted custody of the means of ensuring a good death, have a positive duty to help terminally ill patients in intractable pain who wish to die, which is a duty grounded in the bioethical principles of beneficence and non-malfeasance (Young).…

    • 2509 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most individuals, especially those fond of medical dramas, know of the Hippocratic Oath and its primary obligation of doing no harm; however, the vow physicians take before graduating medical school is being challenged by physician assisted suicide, also known as PAS. Individuals diagnosed with a terminal illness that causes pain and suffering towards the end of life will pick a date to painlessly die before their disease progresses too far. As this practice becomes more widespread, arguments over the ethics of medical doctors aiding in the suicide of their ill patients have erupted. Some argue that in doing so, doctors violate the Hippocratic Oath while stripping the patient of their personal autonomy. Those who support the decision to commit…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Hippocratic oath, “specifically notes that the physician will give no deadly medicine”(Fuller 11). Just like any other document with mandating guidelines, there is room for interpretations. If a physician is following the letter of the ‘law’, they would follow the literal interpretation of the words in the oath but not necessarily the intent of Hippocrates. Following the spirt of the ‘law’ in this case, could be not to cause a patient intentional harm or pain. The over arching idea of the Hippocratic oath is to “do no harm”. Josh Sanburn writes, “Since Hippocrates, doctors have taken their credo to do no harm. But what if a patient believes the treatment to keep them alive is more harmful than death?”(Sanburn 50) In the award winning documentary, “ How to Die in Oregon” Dr. Katherine Morris sheds light on a new outlook on “do not harm”. The documentary follows the last months of a terminal ill patient, Cody Curtis’s, life. Dr. Morris states, “ I think Cody taught me that first do no harm is going to be different for every patient. Harm, for her, would have meant taking away control and saying no, no, no, you’ve got to do this the way your body decides as opposed to the way you as a person decides”(Dir. Peter Richardson). Do no harm is different for every patient and stay alive though continual suffering can cause unnecessary harm to a…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physicians and other medical caregivers have the obligation to maintain life, as sworn in the Hippocratic Oath which states: 'I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect'. The Hippocratic Oath is an oath stating the obligations and proper conduct of doctors, taken by those beginning medical practice. The Hippocratic physician rejects the view that the patient's choice for death can make killing him right. Helping a patient commit suicide directly disobeys the Oath. The official position of the Catholic Church in Rome remains that killing of a human being, even by an act of omission to eliminate suffering, violates divine law and offends the dignity of the human person.…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays