PHIL 181: Ethics - Section 6
October 31, 2011
Nietzsche Response Paper In Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra, we learn that every one of our actions is influenced by a higher interest or objective, ultimately seeking personal fulfillment. Everything we do has a determined purpose that directs our life into a desired path. Aristotle portrays our actions as ends, and he believes that each end leads to a higher end until reaching a final end, eudaimonia. He believes that the only way to fulfill our life and attain complete happiness in life is to reach eudaimonia. Eudaimonia can only be reached once we have accomplished our personal goals, and practiced enough virtuous acts to develop excellence in character. Aristotle believes that developing virtue is the most important element for a fulfilling life. To be virtuous, we must have knowledge of what we are doing; we must know why it is important to do it; our actions must spring from a characteristic from our soul; and we must practice it with other people. In Book VIII of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle talks about the importance of friendship. Aristotle believes that friendship is a kind of virtue that is necessary for a good life. He believes that we cannot attain true happiness without knowing the value of friendship, no matter how successful we may be. Therefore, Aristotle claims that we must reach eudaimonia by fulfilling our personal ends, and at the same time taking the effort to care about other people’s dreams and aspirations. But why is the development of friendship so important? If eudaimonia is the fulfillment of our personal lives, why should we care about other people? Are Aristotle’s thoughts about friendship egoist or altruist? After analyzing the text, we can interpret that even though friendship may sound like an altruistic concept, Aristotle depicts it as completely egoistic.
The reason why Aristotle believes friendship is so significant is because of the personal benefits we gain from creating a good relationship with a friend. We don’t befriend people just because we care about others. Our desire to build friendships is selfishly motivated by our own personal interests. Aristotle states that there are three different types of friends: The pleasant, the useful, and the good. If we take a look at each type of friend, we can discover the underlying egoistic motives for wanting a friend. We benefit from the pleasant friend because we satisfy our own pleasures and desires; once the pleasure ends the friendship dies as well. We benefit from the useful friend because we use them to feed our personal needs; once they stop being useful the friendship loses its value and dies. Lastly, we take a look at good friends. Good friends share similar values and principles, and see each other as their second selves. Thus, good friends also usually have similar goals and interests which mean they have a similar eudaimonia. We choose to have good friends because we feel that we can help each other reach this similar eudainomia. But the reality is that we only wish good for our friends for our own sake, because their success means we succeed too. Building friendships helps us achieve a psychological state of satisfaction because we love the relationship we create. Developing the virtue of friendship does not imply that we develop a selfless character that looks after the welfare of others, but that we will build relationships with others in order to benefit from it through pleasure, utility, and success.
We can see that in modern day society we live a more individualistic life. Friendship is not as important to us now as it was in Aristotle’s era. But the same egoistic mentality still remains. We try to fulfill our lives by accomplishing our personal goals, and fight for a higher social status. Everyone tries to fend for themselves in a survival of the fittest. Every moral choice we make is based on whether we believe it is beneficial to us, whether physically or psychologically. Virtue today is always dependent on whether we benefit from our actions, so I believe that the virtue of good friendship has lost its meaning.
Works Cited
Aristotle, and Martin Ostwald. Nicomachean Ethics. Indianapolis [Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962. Print.
Cited: Aristotle, and Martin Ostwald. Nicomachean Ethics. Indianapolis [Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962. Print.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Aristotle’s idea of Virtue Ethics was influenced by his belief that all things and all humans have a purpose (a telos). For him a complete explanation of something has to include its final cause or purpose which essentially is to realise its potential. Virtue Ethics itself is concerned with the characteristics of a person rather than how a person behaves and it is this he outlined in his book Nicomachean Ethics. A ‘’virtue’’ are qualities that lead to a good life e.g. courage and honesty. Aristotle explains for a person to adopt these qualities into their own lives is to maximise their potential to achieve a happy life and he goes on to explain Eudaimonia as being a quality of this happiness.…
- 1035 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
When friendships are dissolved, the consequences can be devastating. In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics - VIII – IX he explains how humans learn from one another, and that humans are innately social animals (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics - VIII – IX, 148-149). Friendships are required in life learn about values. Without friends, humans would not be able to learn such values from each other, nor will they be able to confide in each other. Having friends in life allow for the mutual growth of both parties. Rebecca Traister writes in her article “What Women Find in Friends That They May Not Get from Love” her experiences with her friend Sara. Traister says, “In each other, we found respite, recognition, a shared eagerness to relax, take stock and talk about it all.” (Sara Traister, “What Women Find in Friends That They May Not Get from Love, 1), going on to say this relationship was mutual where they benefited from each other’s company. As they both grew together over time, much like Aristotle suggests is the value of friendship. Humans life are not fulfilled unless friends are there to support each other. As Traister says, “For many women, friends are our primary partner through life” (Sara Traister, “What Women Find in Friends That They May Not Get from Love, 5). In Traister’s case, the friendship she shares with Sara is a friendship of virtue.…
- 1192 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Aristotle’s ethics focuses on virtues of character and good habits. His big term he uses is eudemonia, which means happiness.…
- 514 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, he states that there are three types of friendships that can be obtained- the friendship of pleasure, the friendship of utility and the friendship of good. The friendship of pleasure is a relationship based on the simple enjoyment of being around a particular person; the friendship of utility is a relationship based on convenience. In other words, this friendship has no real meaning behind it, other than this person is around this person frequently, so they might as well be friends. Lastly, the third category of friendship is that based on good. Friendship of good is the pure delight of one person and everything about that person. Good is the best form of friendship because it is the most virtuous. This…
- 337 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the preceding quote by C.S Lewis; Mr Lewis explains what friendship does for a person. To paraphrase it in an understandable way, he seems to have said; Friendship is not necessary to survive, it only enhances life and makes life more interesting. This is my personal viewpoint exactly! Throughout life many people like to have other people close by them, parents have children, couples are married, teenagers have friends…. A lot of life is spent with friends and this many cause people to think that without friends they become nothing.…
- 741 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Within book 8 and 9 of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he proposes friendship is one of the most choice-worthy goods an individual can have (Aristotle 149, 1170a, section 7). However, in chapter 3 of book 8, Aristotle asserts the finest friendships are enduring insofar it is good, and the virtues remain the same. However, his proposal about the similarities of virtues doesn't seem entirely correct since people gradually change over time, but the relationship can continue to be good and individuals remain close friends. Problematically, Aristotle asserts if the characteristics of the friend were to change, the friendship ought to be dissolved since the peer can potentially become bad; unless the agent can return their friend to their original…
- 1295 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
In Aristotle’s Book II of Nicomachean Ethics, he explains that virtue of character is the mean to the ultimate end, which is happiness. Aristotle states that, without a goal or ultimate end (happiness), life does not have a purpose. Therefore every action in a person’s life has to be made with true virtue of character in mind in order to achieve…
- 1386 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
One cannot fully grasp the concept of how belittled this adolescent felt. This action altered her perspective on how much her life-worth equals by living in the harsh and cruel world. Not only in her eyes, but the eyes of the people surrounding her. While going through everyday life, people seldom stop and think about how lucky they are. The idea that everyone is equal is nonexistent to so many.…
- 773 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
“The genesis of language does not proceed logically in any case, and all the material within which and with which the man of truth, the scientist, and the philosopher later work and build, if not derived from never-never land, is at least not derived from the essence of things” Truth and language are fundamentally social conventions which have their origins in metaphor and are arbitrary and subjective and that language is not about adequately mirroring the world. I support this idea; the reason is that if we consider that we have different languages, we can see that each one works about equally well even though each is so different. But maybe the purpose of language is not one-to-one meticulousness or correspondence to reality. Pure truth would echo the Kantian thing-in-itself independent of our experiences; therefore it verifies the concept that there is no pure truth in language. Language is there to deal with relations of things to man. To do this, bold metaphors are needed. A metaphor says that “A is B” where B really belongs to a different category of being. We forget the origin of truth in metaphors, metonymies, and anthropomorphisms, they congeal and harden, are taken for granted, and we come to assume that they necessarily describe the way the world really is. Which is why I believe Nietzsche’s essay is a meta-rhetorical expedition into how meaning comes to mean, and there is no true in our words because it is a man made creation, and a creation (truth) that differs relative to our personal perspectives then the concept of it would have been completely insignificant and we would not be discussing this piece 200 years later……
- 280 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Aristotle was a greek philosopher who wrote the book “Nicomachean Ethics”. Aristotle’s view of human natures centers around humans achieving happiness. Too him happiness is our highest goal in life. Aristotle points out that most people in this world have a false view of what happiness really means. Most think of it as physical pleasure like eating, sex, or honor. These people have an imperfect view of what it means to be alive and what it means to be happy. The reason people have a false idea of happiness is because they lack virtue. Virtue is behaving in the right manner. Such as being courageous in life or being a coward. If one is courageous they will find happiness in being such while the coward would find happiness in the opposite but that is a false happiness. Aristotle takes the reader through the true meaning of being alive. He talks about many different aspects of achieving the good life and being happy; he stresses on topics like eudaemonia, classes of goods, and our telos and function in this world.…
- 687 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Cicero had multiple characteristics on friendship; however in this paper only three of his characteristics of friendship will be discussed. According to Cicero, friendship is founded on a moral and ethical base, and there is a relationship between virtue and friendship. Virtue is essential for friendship and friendship helps in maintaining virtue. Virtue is behavior showing high moral standards. Therefore friendship is based on virtue, and friendship helps achieve greater virtue. Cicero supports this in his text by saying “Those who place the ultimate good in virtue act the most splendidly, and virtue produces and contains friendship within itself, nor can friendship exist in any way without virtue.” (Cicero 8). When choosing friends, it would be best to pick ones with the same morals. However regardless of different cultures and lifestyles almost everyone has similar morals. We should all aim to get the most out of a healthy relationship that includes learning good morals and virtues.…
- 915 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Friendship is a virtue or at least involves virtue. Friendship is always a special thing but people tend to forget about how much its value is. Friendship is not just necessary, but also noble.Friendship consists of goodwill between two people. You can only have a few friends being that its take some precious time to build a real friendship. Aristotle’s speaks about how there are three kinds of friendship. The first is friends of utility, where both people receive some benefit from each other. Aristotle believed that this is the type of friendship that is for the old. Aristotle argued that they “are at such a time of life pursue not what is pleasant but what is beneficial.” The second is friends of pleasure, where both people are attracted to each other, good looks, or other their pleasant qualities all together . aristotles says this friendship is for the young. Aristotle argues that the young because “...quickly become friends and quickly stop...” and “...love and stop loving quickly...” The third is friends of excellence, where both people admire the other’s excellence and help one another strive for excellence. Aristotle says this about friends of excellence “...complete sort of friendship between people who are good and alike in virtue...”friends of virtue or excellence is hard to come by especially in the world we live in today because it is so much individualism. According to Aristotle the first two friendships are accidental, because in these case friends are only thinking about their own utility and pleasure, not are going to change over a period of time. If a friendship is based on excellence it will be a long lasting relationship, because excellence is a quality. This kind of friendship is the one everyone wants to have and it overlooks the other two friendships. This kind of friendship though is hard to find and takes a lot of time to progress but it is worth it. It is nothing like having a real and true friend. Friends who want the same thing will…
- 618 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Aristotle believes that there is only one goal, one ultimate end for every individual—that is eudaimonia, translated as happiness, not as a feeling but happiness as the highest human good or a life full of activity. He claims that a person should live a way of life distinct from the lives of animals, where they only live for the sake of living or pleasure.1 As human beings, people should use their power of speech to communicate and make rational decisions within a polity, striving to live their lives up to their full potential and to their full capacity for a happy life.2 The life of politics, the via activa, is thus the key to the chief good or the best life for humans; however, the life of action must be of certain type of quality, in accordance with reason, since different actions may lead to the good or the bad life. In other words, a person’s actions must be in line with arête, with virtue or excellence.3…
- 980 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The concept of Amicitia according to Cicero describes the true nature of friendship, which is conceivable only between good men who are virtuous and who follow the nature. The more man is virtuous the more he can become a true friend. Then if the virtue is the basis of true friendship, it should not be focused on material things than the other can offer to their friends. The friendship of Cicero goes on to describe the bonds of friendship among the less significant that man can give, but it becomes durable the more men are related to each other. No matter what happen if it is bounded in authentic friendship, then it will not be deteriorating of anyone else.…
- 230 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Virtue is the key to a meaningful and happy life. According to ancient philosophers, Socrates and Aristotle, developing virtue is vital in order to lead a successful, fulfilling life. Though both men differ in their interpretations of a "good life," they both agree that the supreme life is one of virtuous meaning. Each of the philosophers have devised and implemented their own definitions and guidelines to acquire and practice a virtuous disposition. While it is agreed that knowledge and practice are the key to virtuosity, the philosophers disagree on fundamental rules to follow. The inherent question to be explored concerns the idea of virtue; what is it and how does one acquire it? The answer is anything but simple, but a blend of both philosophies can shed light on the two men 's view on practicing a virtuous life. Socrates and Aristotle believe in distinct ends to a common mean.…
- 1948 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays