Preview

Nietzsche's Argument For The Existence Of God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1454 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nietzsche's Argument For The Existence Of God
The debate of whether God exists or does not has been going on from the time of the ancient philosophers such as St. Aquinas and St. Anselm, who both supported the existence of God, whereas, many years later there were those who tried to disprove the arguments presented. Some of these disbelievers include Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche and David Hume, all whom argue that God does not indeed exist. Although God is considered dead and nonexistent by many, he does indeed exist because something must have existed in the beginning, he inspires goodness and faith in his subjects and he is perceived as the perfect being, who must exist in order to be considered perfect.
It is impossible for something to exist without the existence of God, as
…show more content…
Nietzsche believed that society had evolved past God and God was no longer the moral example for people, in other words, God was dead to the people. Furthermore, Nietzsche argued that the people killed God, due to the indifference to God’s existence, as people transitioned from the belief in faith to the belief in rationalism and science. “Companions, the creator seeks, not corpses, not herds and believers. Fellow creators the creator seeks - those who write new values on new tables.” (Nietzsche 22) Therefore, due to the cultural shift, Nietzsche suggested that people must write their own values and not just follow a dead God, who’s values are no longer relevant to the new …show more content…
In the book “Proslogion” by St. Anselm, he argues that God must be a perfect being, as if he is not, then one can always imagine a more perfect being, however that being impossible, as nothing can be greater than God. “Therefore, Lord, not only are You that than which a greater cannot be thought, but You are also something greater than can be thought. For since it is possible to think that there is such a one, then, if you are not this same being something greater than You could be thought-which cannot be,” (Anselm 96) The point that Anselm was trying to make is that God is thought of as being the most perfect being, however if he was only in people’s imagination, then something would be able to be greater than him, which is impossible. In order for God to be perceived as the most perfect being, he must exist outside of people’s minds. The same type of justification was used by Renée Descartes in his book “Meditations on first philosophy”, where he further elaborated that God is a perfect being and that existence is a predicate for perfection, meaning that without existing, God could not be perfect. “While from the fact that I cannot conceive God without existence, it follows that existence is inseparable from Him, and hence that He really exists; not that my thought can bring this to pass, or impose any necessity on things, but, on the contrary, because the necessity which lies in the thing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Anselm put forward his ideas about the existence of God through his book, the Proslogion. He started by simply giving the word ‘God’ a definition, and then explaining that to not believe in God was absurd. The Proslogion consisted of two main parts. In Proslogion 1, Anselm explained God as being…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes later reformulated the ontological argument, who sought to prove the existence of God through reason alone. He stated that he exists, and in his mind he has the concept of a perfect being, and as an imperfect being, he could not have conjured up the idea of a perfect being, therefore this idea must have originated from the perfect being itself, and this perfect being must exist in order to be perfect, consequently a perfect being exists. He also stated that the idea of God is the idea of a perfect being, and a supremely perfect being has all perfections, existence is perfection, a supremely perfect being must have existence, therefore it is impossible to think of God as not existing, hence God exists.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ontological argument describes God as “a being than which nothing greater can be conceived”, Anselm argued that the greatest possible being must exist otherwise he would not be the greatest possible being, although he must be the greatest possible being in every way including mind and reality. Anselm said atheists can define God even if they don’t believe in him. René Descartes said “I think therefore I am”, this means that if you can think about it you do exist, therefore if we think about God; he must exist. God must have all perfections in order to be the greatest being; existence was perfection is…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Saint Anselm and Gaunilo’s “The Ontological Argument”, Anselm believes that God is the greatest of all conceivable things and nothing else can be ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes thinks that since we all have an innate idea of a perfect being, then that perfect being, which he calls God, has to exist, or else it would not be perfect anymore. There are two problems with this line of thought. First, do we really have an innate idea of a perfect being? Wouldn’t we need to acquire the concept of “perfect” and “being” first? It is true that we could not have directly seen or experienced a perfect being in real life, but that does not mean the idea of a perfect being has to be innate. Rather, we can form this idea merely by experiencing non-perfect beings and imagining the opposite, just like how we develop the idea of immaterial things after we have seen or experienced material things. Therefore, the idea of a perfect being is not innate, and in fact, it is possible for us never to have that idea at all. On the other hand, why must a perfect being exist? Why should existence be better, “more perfect,” than non-existence? Descartes does not give us enough evidence of the “perfectness” of existence, and thus existence cannot be guaranteed as an essential part of the perfect being’s property. Now I have shown that Descartes’ main argument for God’s existence is flawed, although I still do not rule out the possibility of God’s…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anselm’s second argument states that it is logically necessary for God to exist. Anselm states that god is the greatest conceivable being, so it would be less great to imagine him not existing than to imagine him existing.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an all-perfect God is the ontological argument. While there are several different versions of the argument, all purport to show that it is self-contradictory to deny that there exists a greatest possible being. Thus, on this general line of argument, it is a necessary truth that such a being exists; and this being is the God of traditional Western theism. This article explains and evaluates classic and contemporary versions of the ontological argument.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The existence of God is one of the greatly talked about philosophical topics throughout history. There have been many arguments proposed in order to answer the question. One argument is the ontological argument. The first person to propose the ontological argument is St. Anselm in the eleventh century. St. Anselm tries to prove the existence God from the idea of a being that which no greater being can be imagined. St. Anselm contemplated that, if such a being did not exist, then a more superior being can be thought of to…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anselm presented his argument in the second and third chapters of Proslogian. In chapter 2, Anselm says that God being than which none greater can be imagined is a conceptual truth. He acknowledged that a being that is present in both mind and reality is much greater than a being that exists only in the mind. Hence, if God only exists as an idea in the mind, we can think of something that is greater than God. We can think of the greatest possible being that does exist. This is a contradiction Anselm says. He says that we cannot think of something that is greater than God, for he is the greatest being of all. With this deductive reasoning, Anselm believes God is existent. In Chapter 3, he supports his topic in a different view. He says that a being that exists in reality is greater than a being that doesn’t exist in reality. Anselm states that by definition, “if God exists as an idea in the mind but not in reality, something greater is there.” Again he says that this is impossible. If God exists as an idea in the mind, God exists in reality. Since God exist in the mind, god exists in…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought to yourself, is there a god? Is there actually an almighty being to protect us? Someone who will be there to forgive us for our immoralities? Well in this report, I will be examining evidence there is that suggests the existence of god to determine whether or not there I a possibility of the existence of God.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hum 112

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rene Descartes in his Discourse of the Method begins with the problem of showing and proving his own existence, but later in the reading changes the problem and it is concentrating on proving the existence of God. The first time that I thought to myself that this reading is probably about something else than proving his own existence was where the author started talking about perfection. The author defined God as “something that truly was more perfect than I was, something indeed having perfections of which I could have any idea” (Descartes, 2010, p.16).…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Paper 1

    • 1625 Words
    • 4 Pages

    St. Anselm wrote “The Ontological Proof of God’s Existence”. He believes it is one thing for an object to be in the understanding and another to understand that the object exists. God must exist in the mind even if that mind is a “fool” who doesn’t believe in God. He thinks that if the greatest possible being (God) exists in the mind, then he must exist in reality. If God only exists in the mind, then an even greater being must be possible. This being exists in the mind…

    • 1625 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His existence should not be doubted, simply for the reason that God may be an event. All that should be taken from this is the existence of God based on the idea that whatever created the universe is God. However, God can also be proved to be a sentient being. The proof of God being a sentient creature is similar to Rene Descartes belief that the perfect being cannot be imagined within in our own minds, but can only exist if the perfect creature placed the idea within our mind. The problem with this argument is that the idea of perfect cannot be defined, who is to say what perfect is? The idea of perfection is infinite and cannot be truly analyzed, however we can know that the creation of the universe can be qualified as perfect due to our existence and the way nature interacts with itself. The perfect cannot coexist in the universe as we as a species is flawed and cannot attain perfection. The perfection of the universe must exist in one single being. The single embodiment can only be defined as a supreme being. The supreme being can be called anything, but as a society it has been widely accepted to refer to it as…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ontological Argument

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anselm defines God as a being “that than which no greater can be conceived.” He argues that, whatever can be understood exists in the mind and that the concept of God can be understood, so God exists in the mind. Anselm then tries to prove that God also exists in reality and not only in the mind. The first premises states “assume that God only exists in the mind and not in reality.” The second premises positions “but then a greater being than God can be thought.” Finally, we can conclude “but God was defined as a being that than which nothing greater can be conceived; so, no greater than God can be thought.” The second and last premises that “a greater being than God can be thought” and “no greater than God can be thought” are contradictions. Therefore, our original assumption that God only exists in reality must be false. Anselm implies that only a fool would deny God’s existence. He questions, “Why, then, has the fool said in his heart, there is no God (Psalms XIV. 1), since it is so evident, to a rational mind, that you do exist in the highest degree of all? Why, except that he is…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedrich Nietzsche believed that everyone should own up to envy because there was nothing wrong with being envious and it should serve as a guide or indication of what we could become one day. He believed that if we had a purpose in life we could put up with almost anything to be able to achieve what we wanted. Although, Nietzsche’s intentions were meant for good, envy does not always serve as a great guide or indication of what we could become. Some could take a negative turn to that emotion and possibly harm themselves or others in order to attain whatever it was they envied from the other party. Not everyone would take that as a means of motivation to work harder for what they truly desired or envied, some would have resorted to the…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays