Nike makes a great product with very low costs, they have the best athletes in the world wearing their gear, and they have Phil Knight, who was just inducted into the advertising hall of fame, as an advertising guru. These three factors make Nike almost impossible to compete with. The cost advantage of moving the factories overseas is exponential and provided a pathway for the corporation to enter new emerging markets. The moving of these plants may seem unethical to some people but the decision was made for the best interest of the business. No one can be a winner when the company has lost its competitiveness in the industry (Etienne, and Lewis,…
to produce its products. The issue was that the government of these countries didn’t enforce any labor laws or human right laws and therefore sweatshops were legal. The ethical aspect of this case was if Nike should be held responsible for its subcontractors.…
The success of Nike, however, has not come without controversy. In its efforts to rapidly expand and grow to a worldwide business, the corporation has had its share of ethical controversy, mostly stemming from its largely outsourced factory work. Asian countries like Pakistan, Malaysia, India, Indonesia, China, Philippines, and Thailand contain the majority of Nike’s factories (Professional Ethics Articles, 2012). This has presented Nike with a substantial amount of bad publicity and negative public response.…
Nike has been a provider of athletic apparel for years, the Nike Swoosh is a global icon seen from New York, Philippines, China, and Manila just to name a few countries. Nike is synonymous with sporting events of every magnitude and is seen as a multinational presence. In the early 1990’s Nike began to outsource its supply chain operations to contract-factories operating in nations such as Bangladesh, Taiwan, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Moldova, Argentina, Nicaragua, Mexico, Sri Lanka, Turkey, China, and India with more that are not mentioned (Nike, Inc., n.d.). Nike has a reputation to uphold regardless of what country they…
Nike plays an enormous role in our youth fashion and athletic attire and has a huge role in our world’s economy and the global effect it has on our earth. Working in the enormous Nike factories around the world is an opportunity to help these people survive. It is not slavery; it is a chance for the poor to get a job and support their families. Nike said they would change their practices and they have. Nike had a few steps to get back into the game. The first step was to identify the problems such as workers’ wages, working environment and then make the improvements, and while doing that they were helping the poor. In the past,…
According to the case study, Nike is well-liked and popular shoe and athletic wear company, and carries a slogan of “Just Do It”. The case study indicates that, “Nike is now one of the leading marketers of athletic shoes and apparel on the planet. Nike does not manufacture its own product. Rather, it designs and markets its products, while contracting for their manufacture from global network of 600 factories scattered around the globe that employs some 650,000 people”, (Hill, 2013, p. 154). Nike Corporation’s success and billions of profits has affected hundreds of thousands of workers mainly in Asian countries. These workers, toiled in a cruel working conditions and environment with a slave pay. The production of Nike products are subcontracted to Asian countries such as China, Indonesia, Taiwan, and Vietnam. Nike products are produce overseas to avoid higher taxes in the United States and the benefit from hiring workers for very low wages.…
Nike sells to approximately 140 countries around the world and currently boasts an approximate revenue of $8,776,900,000 These revenues are based on product sales of shoes, clothing, and other sports products. Advertising expenditures currently total $223,300,000 and include the following allocations: $64,975,000 for network television, $31,447,000 for consumer magazines, $7,700,000 for spot television, $343,000 for newspapers, $134,000 for outdoor postings, and $36,000 for radio. (Reed Elsevier) Most footwear products are made outside of USA. However apparel products are produced in the USA and abroad. (www.statcan.ca) In this article we will try to explore the interaction between the company Nike and its external business environment, as well as the internal strengths and weaknesses of the company. We will attempt to discover some of the significant changes and events in the external environment that have occurred in the last 5 years and have directly impacted Nike. We will describe how the company adapted and responded to these changes and what the effects of these events were. Also we will identify and describe some of Nike's internal strengths and weaknesses.…
The initial reaction from Nike was to say that it was not their responsibility to oversee what was going on overseas. Nike did try to have someone investigate the situation; however Nike only had the private investigator look into the poor labor conditions. The problem was that the world wanted to know about the issues about child labor, and compensation. If Nike had wanted to let this bad publicity die down, they should have allowed an independent company investigate the entire situations. After their findings Nike should have apologized for any wrong doing and then Nike should have tried to correct the problem. Nike would have looked bad for a short period of time. But they would have looked more accountable had they acknowledged their mistakes and try to alleviate the problems. In the end Nike created more of a problem for…
Nike has around 700 contract factories, within which around 20% of the workers are creating Nike products. Conditions for these workers have been a source of heated debate, with allegations made by campaigns of poor conditions, with harassment and abuse. Nike has sought to respond to these allegations by putting into place a code of conduct for all of its suppliers, and working with the Global Alliance to review around 21 of these factories, and to pick up and respond to issues.…
Nike should also be held responsible for what happens in factories they do not own to a certain degree because low-cost manufacturing has always been their strategy in the market. Although they do not directly own these factories, they should take the initiative to be socially responsible and monitor the minimum working conditions as it would reflect on the…
Poor working conditions have been present for centuries. Often times little or nothing is done unless a tragedy occurs to persuade the public to rally for worker rights. This was definitely the case in the United States during the Industrial Revolution and even late in the 20th Century. These conditions have for most purposes disappeared in the United States, with the exception of some in the agricultural sector. However, internationally, mainly in poor third world countries, that is far from the truth. Large corporations from the United States have moved a large portion of their factories overseas to circumvent the strict working regulations within the United States. The third…
Nike’s official website has a detailed set of “responsibilities” that it must adhere to in order to maintain a safe and fair working environment. Many of the policies are to do with sustainable production and development of their products. However many investigations through current affairs programs have revealed that some of these responsibilities are not being carried out. Nike has been accused of allowing the factories to force their workers to work 7 days a week, long days, employing underage workers. Nike continually defends it’s factories saying that the reports that they receive and inspections that they carry out show no signs of abuses or exploitation.…
In the 1990’s, Nike, a well-known shoe company, came under intense fire for claims of labor issues stemming from wages to working conditions to child exploitation. Years of bad publicity plagued the company, including bouts with the media and even celebrities. Nike’s initial response was to deny and defend its company name. The activists continued to pursue to the point that Nike is forced to face its criticism head on.…
Nike has had a long history of abusive labor practices and controversies, but how did it all begin? Nike was founded in 1964 by Phil Knight, a University of Oregon track athlete, and Bill Bowerman, his coach. Initially, they were an athletic footwear distributor, but began manufacturing their own products in 1971. By the 1980’s, the company had begun offshoring their production manufacturing. Controversies regarding unethical labor practices began surfacing in 1991, mostly due to an expose by human rights and labor activist Jeff Ballinger. Nike responded to these criticisms by creating a factory code of conduct. The company assumed this would resolve the abusive labor practices at their factories worldwide. They were wrong.…
Manufacturers in foreign locations were only concerned with the minimal contract requirements and overlooking fair labor practices in order to perform as low-cost suppliers. The foreign locations also subcontracted the work so Nike did was adequately track the working conditions and wages being paid and the ages of the workers. They failed to address these issues earlier because they wanted to maintain lower cost and there was not a focus on how they were able to accomplish this. Organizations such as National Labor Committee helped make the public aware of the poor conditions and public outrage made Nike and others more transparent and accountable.…