Gordan Allport (1934) identified both the idiographic and nomothetic approaches to personality testing. This essay will concentrate solely on the nomothetic approach and attempt to identify both the strengths and limitations when explaining personality using this approach.
The nomothetic approach suggests that most personality traits are consistent within humans. People show universal traits that only differ in the extent to which the trait is present. For example analysing behaviours such as aggression within a set environment allows psychologists to establish norms for this behaviour within the group and furthermore identify normal and abnormal degrees of aggression, in individuals within the population studied. Traits that apply to everyone are referred to as common traits suggesting everybody have similar basic core personalities
The nomothetic approach relies on quantitative research methods such as self report and questionnaires to establish universal behaviours.
One problem with this approach is that of reductionism, generalisations, which will inevitably be made, present the problem that the results from the research may only show a superficial understanding of the individual being tested. It could be argued that treating human personality as an accumulation of individual characteristics distorts reality and oversimplifies human personality by failing to examine the full range of an individual’s reaction in particular situations and contexts and therefore can be argued as being reductionist. (Lazarus, R & Monat, A 1979).
These generalisations may result in important ethical issues, findings using this approach may result in generalisations too the entire population, which could then be used to influence and control peoples lives. This happened when Gould (1981) studied the universal construct of intelligence, the results of the intelligence tests lead to the control of specific minority groups who scored low on the tests. These results were generalised to all members of the population which lead to unethical behaviour in society. This is a major limitation that needs to be considered in research using this approach.
The application of this approach in everyday life needs to be considered carefully. Using this approach in diagnosing depression is useful for establishing set characteristics and diagnostic criteria; however a much further, in-depth analysis is required to fully understand and meet the needs of the individual’s case in order to guide them in their recovery process.
Another strength of the nomothetic approach is that it is useful in order to explain and in particularly, predict future behaviour of individuals. Paunonen S, Douglas N (1986). This approach allows us to look at universal behaviour in humans & therefore help us to predict and explain human behaviour in the future. This can be very helpful in certain psychological settings such as criminology in order to predict and where possible prevent future crimes from occurring, if central traits can be identified in criminals that could be prevented.
As pointed out by another weakness of the nomothetic approach to personality testing is that most psychologists especially those using the nomothetic approach ignore individual differences within personality. This approach may lead to a limited understanding of individuals which limits understanding and depth of individual’s personalities which is considered with the idiographic approach.
Holt (1967) also needs to be considered. Holt suggested that any description will include generalisation to some extent. This supports the nomothetic approach it suggests that we need a schema, an understanding of people, if we are able to analyse a specific individual, therefore nomothetic approaches are essential even if idiographic approaches are implemented. K
This idea supports the nomothetic approach to personality testing; it suggests that an exclusively idiographic approach is just not possible, as comparing the individual to others is essential to understanding the personality trait shown. This suggests others must have the traits identified in the individual to some extent as suggested in the nomothetic approach.
.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Although, one must take into consideration when using a personality test, both practical and theoretical concerns. “Personality…
- 250 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
In this case discussing both projective and self-report personality tests in terms of their reliability and validity in a social context. These tests are extremely useful in multiple ways such as calculating future behaviour and recognizing future behaviours according to Plotnik (2002). There are so many personality tests available for use but this essay will discuss the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory – 2, the Rorschach Inkblot test and the Thematic Apperception Test. These personality tests are used by various people in society such as researchers, doctors and employers, because it allows them to analyse someone’s personality and draw conclusions relative to their area. Although the extent to which each test is accurate can be disputed. Before the tests can be discussed in terms of their reliability and validity we must first understand how each of them test for…
- 1012 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Butcher, J. N. (2010). Personality Assessment from the Nineteenth to the Early Twenty-First Century: Past Achievements and Contemporary Challenges. The Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Vol 6,, 1-20. doi:10.1146/ annurev.clinpsy.121208.131420…
- 846 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Dispositional personality theories are quite different from biological personality theories. The two will be compared and dissected in this article. The Big Five Personality Test will also be analyzed and how it is used to study personality will be examined.…
- 1003 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Psychologists have long puzzled over the way in which individuals may act differently in identical situations, resulting in various strands of personality theory to have emerged within the realm of psychology each attempting to explain personality traits at various levels , these being experimental, psychometric and clinical. Butt (2004) notes how Eysenck’s Trait Theory although presented as a clinical approach to understanding individual difference, was fundamentally rooted within the psychometric tradition which emerged from within the mainstream paradigm in the early twentieth century . Most famously to appear from this era was the Likert scale…
- 1980 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
This essay discusses the major strengths and weaknesses of nomothetic and idiographic approaches to personality with the help of associated theories. Personality is defined as the psycho-physcial traits and mechanisms within an individual, influencing their interactions and adaptability to the ‘environment’. Nomothetic and idiographic approaches are two different methods used to provide an insight into and determine the personalities of people. While both approaches are meant to further ones understanding of personality in different situations, there are significant differences as well as advantages and disadvantages for, in addition to, each method as this essay will highlight.…
- 924 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Trait theory was developed by Eysenck and Rachman (1965,cited in Butt,2007) and belongs to the mainstream, experimental approach to individual differences (Butt,2007). The aim of trait theory is to produce general principles of why people behave differently in different situations. Questionnaires, for example Eysenck’s Personality Inventory (EPI), are used to produce psychometric inventories, which are a measure of personality traits. This is a scientific approach, facilitating prediction of how a particular person will react in a specific situation. Other trait theorists (e.g. Kant) considered traits to be categorical. Their understanding was that each individual could be assigned to one particular category; no one could be a mixture of two or more categories. However, Eysenck’s use of criterion analysis discredited this belief in categorization, and suggested a continuum of traits. His understanding was of individuals being measured along a two continuums; extraversion-introversion and neuroticism-stability. He proposed that a person’s score on these continuums allows prediction of how they will react in a particular situation.…
- 2158 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Nomothetic approach is considered scientific due to its’ precise measurement, prediction and control of behaviour, investigations of large groups, objective and controlled methods allowing for replication and generalisation. Due to this, it has helped psychology become more scientific by developing theories that can be empirically tested.…
- 1085 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Psychologists use the method of personality assessments to test personalities. Testing personalities is much like testing intelligence and because it measures something that is intangible and invisible it can be quite the difficult task. There are different theories of personalities and different methods of assessing those personalities; however some methods of assessment are shared between theories. The four theories are psychodynamic, humanistic, trait and social learning and all have different roots. The methods of assessment are projective tests, personal interview, objective tests, and direct observations. The projective tests consist of simple ambiguous stimuli that can elicit an unlimited number of responses. The personal interview is used to obtain information from the person being interviewed and can be structured or unstructured. An objective test is generally a written test that is administered and scored according to a standard procedure. Usually the tests require simple yes or no responses or for one answer among many to be chosen and are widely used. Direct observation observes a person’s actions in everyday situations over a long period. To assess the psychodynamic theory the methods of projective tests and personal interviews is used. To assess the humanistic theory objective tests and personal interview are used. To assess the trait theory objective tests are used. Social learning theory is assessed with the use of interviews, objective tests and observations. Direct observation observes a person’s actions in everyday situations over a long period. To assess the psychodynamic theory the methods of projective tests and personal interviews is used. To assess the humanistic theory objective tests and personal interview are used. To assess the trait theory objective tests are used. Social learning theory is assessed with the use of interviews, objective tests and…
- 289 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A psychologist called Allport said personality is, ‘What a man really is!’;Whiting later added, ‘Not what he appears to be.’…
- 647 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Over six billion people live on this planet, yet no two of us are alike. Our differences are predominantly reflected in our distinctive actions and our personal appearances. For centuries, people have wondered what makes each of us act the way we do. During this wonderment, people have come to the conclusion that actions reveal our character traits, which in turn reveal our personality. Our personality makes us unique. Furthermore, people distinguish themselves from others by their personal blend of characteristics and the level of emphasis placed on each trait. This distinction reflects our personality and makes us who we are: one in six billion.…
- 1760 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The nomothetic approach- personality is more or less fixed & various aspects of personality (traits) are the same from individual to individual. Individuals possess selection of these traits, which tend to go together in compatible trait clusters, effectively dividing people into personality types. 2. The ideographic approach-individualizes. Personality develops through interaction with the environment (experience) & in accordance with how the individual sees himself.…
- 2506 Words
- 14 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Personality: A Psychological Interpretation: Allport’s first book; devoted an entire chapter to a review of the many different notions of personality offered by theologians, philosophers, poets, sociologists, and psychologists, and concluded that an adequate synthesis of existing definitions might be expressed in the phrase "what a man really is" ?…
- 1884 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Is the cover page in the correct format as indicated in the “Guidelines to writing Assignments”?…
- 2131 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
"Personality" can be defined as a dynamic and organized set of characteristics possessed by a person that uniquely influences his or her cognitions, emotions, motivations, and behaviors in various situations. The word "personality" originates from the Latin persona, which means mask. Significantly, in the theatre of the ancient Latin-speaking world, the mask was not used as a plot device to disguise the identity of a character, but rather was a convention employed to represent or typify that character. Personality may also refer to the patterns of thoughts, feelings and behaviors consistently exhibited by an individual over time that strongly influence our expectations, self-perceptions, values and attitudes, and predicts our reactions to people, problems and stress. In a phrase, personality is not just who we are, Gordon Allport (1937) described two major ways to study personality: the nomothetic and the idiographic. Nomothetic psychology seeks general laws that can be applied to many different people, such as the principle of self-actualization, or the trait of extraversion. Idiographic psychology is an attempt to understand the unique aspects of a particular individual.…
- 4905 Words
- 20 Pages
Powerful Essays