Preview

Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity: a Look Into the Insanity Defense

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1965 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity: a Look Into the Insanity Defense
Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity: A Look into the Insanity Defense On Friday, March 3, 1843, the trial of The Queen v. Daniel McNaughton (West, Walk 12) began. The verdict of this trail changed the way the civilized world views the criminally insane. People who were criminally insane went from being viewed as evil and wild beasts to people who could not be held accountable for their actions at the time of the crime they committed. As time progressed, the insanity defense became an acceptable defense and rules were laid forth on how to declare people criminally insane. In this essay I will give the events responsible for the McNaughton trial and explain how it’s proceedings and verdict helped set forth the ground rules for the present day insanity defense. On January 20, 1843, Daniel McNaughton attempted to assassinate the Prime Minister, Sir Robert Peel. In front on numerous spectators McNaughton fired a pistol into the back of a man he thought was Peel but instead shot Peel’s private secretary, Edward Drummond. Drummond was not killed instantly but he died five days later. A police constable quickly seized McNaughton before he could even get a shot a second shot off and brought him to the Bow Street Police Station (Moran 37, Hacker 45, Asokan, Veeder 587,Weiner 974, Criminal Law 283, Bennett 289- 290). While being interrogated at the police station McNaughton has the revelation “The Tories in my native city have compelled me to do this. They followed me to France, into Scotland and all over to England. In fact, they follow me wherever I go… They have accused me of crimes of which I am not guilty; they do everything in their power to harass and persecute me. In fact they wish to murder me"(Asokan). Asokan tells us that it was well known that McNaughton was harboring an illusion that there was a conspiracy against him. He even believed he was being harassed by spies that were sent by the Catholic with the help of the Jesuits and Tories.


Cited: Asokan, TV. " Daniel McNaughton (1813-1865)." Indian Journal of Psychiatry 49.3 (207): 223-224. Web. 2 Mar 2011. Bennett , Maxwell. "Criminal law as it pertains to ‘mentally incompetent defendants’: a McNaughton rule in the light of cognitive neuroscience." Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 43.4 (2009): 289-298. Web. 2 Mar 2011. Brody, David, James Acker, and Wayne Logan. Criminal Law. Gaithersburg : Aspen Publishers, Inc., 2001. 281-287. eBook. Gesalman, Anne Belli. "A Crazy System." Newsweek 25 Mar 2002: Web. 4 Mar 2011. Hacker, Peter, and Maxwell Bennett. "Criminal Law as It Pertains to Patients Suffering from Psychiatric Diseases.." Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8.1 (2011): 45-58. Web. 2 Mar 2011. Handbook of Psychology: Forensic psychology, Weiner Irving, Donald Freedheim, and Alan Goldstein. Handbook of Psychology: Forensic psychology. Hobken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003. 390-391. eBook. Moran, Richard. "The Modern Foundation for the Insanity Defense: The Cases of James Hadfield (1800) and Daniel McNaughtan (1843)." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 477. (1985): 31-42. Web. 2 Mar 2011. Sobeloff, Simon. "FROM MCNAGHTEN TO DURHAM, AND BEYOND*." American Bar Association Journal (1955): 357-371. Web. 2 Mar 2011. Veeder, Van. Daniel McNaughton. 120. St. Paul: Keefe-Davidson Company, 1903. 587-618. eBook. Weiner, Irving , and Edward Craighead. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. 3. Hoboken : John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010. eBook. West, Donald, and Alexander Walk. Daniel McNaughton: his trial and the aftermath. Ashford: Headley Brothers Ltd, 1977. eBook.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Nevada, 1996991 P. 2d 1183People in the United States commit crimes and make up excuses why they should not be held accountable for a crime. Insanity and temporary Insanity have significant differences. One might ask themselves is there really any meaningful difference? During the history of our court system there has been many significant court decisions which address the controversy topics of insanity and temporary insanity as it relates to criminal procedures. One of the most significant court decision is Miller Vs State Supreme Court of Nevada, 1996 991 P.2d 1183.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Insanity defense first came into England’s radar when Daniel McNaughton, who attempted to murder, Prime Minister Robert Peel. McNaughton Rule became a common law test to determine criminal liability in relation to mentally disturbed defendants. Another notable case is that of Reagan, John Hinckley who in 1981 attempted to assassinate the president.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The basic outline for competency to stand trial is for a person to be aware of the proceedings, know what they are being charged with, and the ability to interact with attorney to work on their own defense. This seem like a simple and easy task to take place, but each year numerous people are unaware of what is happening to them when they are arrested and brought in for initial hearing. Competency is something that can easily be missed if not addressed early on, once noticed the attorney or prosecution may ask for a competency evaluation. The judge holds the decision in his hand but once the issue of competency is raised it would be…

    • 3102 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ Insanity means madness; mental illness (Intermediate Dictionary, pg. 451)”. According to recent insanity plea statistics, there has been a significant increase in insanity defense cases across country. In Edgar Allan Poe’s Short story, “ The Tell Tale Heart “, the narrator is insane because he kills the old man , he gets annoyed by his own heart beat , and he was paranoid.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who can determine if a person is insane, a doctor, a lawyer, a judge, or a jury of your peers? Does any one person really know why someone acts the way they do? Legal insanity is not knowing whether the act you committed was wrong or right. Leon Czolgosz assassinated President William McKinley. Of all the Presidential assassinations, McKinley’s had the most dangerously political movement. This assassination was followed by Theodore Roosevelt taking over the Presidency of the United States. In the 1900’s, the emergence of medicine and law had just began. It was not until the late 1880’s that courts even considered expert witness and expert testimony. Courts began to allow doctors to testify on their medical opinions of defendants they did not treat until after the crimes were committed. The alienist (as mental doctors were called during this time) wanted Leon Czologsz to be criminally insane. His insanity would have made for an easier trial.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good morning your honor and ladies and gentlemen of the jury, today is the day that the defendant in Edgar Allen Poe’s “ The Tell-Tale Heart” is proven to be insane; using the McNaughton rule the caretaker should be placed in a state hospital for the criminally insane. The McNaughton is a standard to be applied by the jury, after hearing medical testimony from prosecution and defense experts, It states that a presumption of sanity, unless the defense proved otherwise.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You are considered insane if a mental disorder stops you from managing matters or obeying the law. John Hinckley’s verdict of Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity created a big commotion among the public. Many felt that the verdict was being used as a means for criminals to avoid their prison sentence, and to await their time in a prison facility (Simon, and Aaronson, 1988).…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    By Reason of Insanity: Should Defendants with Traumatic Brain Injuries Be Held Accountable for Their Actions…

    • 2068 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Insanity in a Sane World

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Holden Caulfield is an insane person in a sane world. What is insanity? Insanity is when you’re in a state of mind that prevents normal perception, behavior or social interaction. This state is mental illness. Insanity is when you do things in deranged or outrageous ways that could frighten people, or make people feel uncomfortable when around you. It’s when you do things out of the ordinary; yet feel as if they are ordinary. Insanity could come about when you’re depressed, or after a traumatic event, and sometimes even by keeping all your feelings bottled up inside of yourself. Sane people are sensible, reliable, well-adjusted and practice sound judgment. It’s behavior that is expected in a society. By these definitions Holden Caulfield is an insane person in a sane world due to his inability to deal with the real world, his obsession with irrelevant details, and his overly judgmental and critical nature. Holden Caulfield is from the book The Catcher and the Rye. By J.D Salinger. Holden Caulfield is the protagonist in the novel and the narrator of the novel.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    insanity plea

    • 673 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The paper will attempt to captivate and motivate the mind of psychologist working with teen between the ages of 12-17 who struggle to understand how to break through regions and spiritual barriers that may prevent them from adequately severing them to their best advantage.…

    • 673 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A large portion of society opposes the insanity plea because they believe that criminals falsely enter the plea to be acquitted of a crime. According to the court, there is doubt in the defense and their ability to properly diagnose an offender. Psychiatrists may have disparate diagnoses and this takes away from the legal value of not guilty by reason of insanity (Doherty). In past cases, the jury is not quick to acquit a criminal, due to insanity, because of the small chance that the offender may be falsely claiming insanity to avoid a longer jail sentence (Vatz “Insanity”). This is not a valid argument because the insanity plea is used only 1% of the time and even then, it is not always accepted (Doherty). The plea seems relatively apparent…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pleading Insanity

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A parent is one who gives birth to, or nurtures and raises a child; a father or a mother (Dictionary, p. 992). Every child born into this world depends on their parents to protect and keep them from harm. Children need to be cared for and nourished by those who love them. Parents are to provide guidance and raise that child to the best of their knowledge until that child is old enough to venture out on their own and be an adult. Parents have a duty to that child. When does it become necessary to protect a child from their own parents and why would a parent want to cause harm to their child. There are many cases of parents killing their own children; one case in particular is that of Andrea Yates, who drowned all five of her children in a bath tub. Many parents end up pleading insanity after murdering their kids. One would think a parent would have enough self control over their own actions and thoughts to not cause harm to their offspring. Many of these parents committing these horrific crimes have been dealing with a mental condition or illness. The big question is why would a parent want to cause harm to their own child?…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Justice Theory

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Defining crime can come from many different perspectives such as psychological, legalistic, sociological, and even political views. Crime is defined as according to (Multi- Media) the conduct in violation of the criminal laws of the state, federal, government, or local jurisdiction, for which there is no legally acceptable justification or excuse. Crime is an act proscribed by law and subject to punishment. It can also be an omission instead of an act, namely a failure to act where the law imposes a duty to that particular act (Dressler, 2002).…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays