The writing of the book of memory is not lettered but is written in “signs and symbols”. Additionally, its contents are concise. The contents of the Book of Memory are akin to an ekphrasis. Just as an ekphrasis points to artwork without being the artwork itself, the book points to knowledge without being the knowledge itself. The Book of Memory is reminiscent of Plato’s theory of the forms being learned and committed to memory by the souls while they are in the divine spheres. Once they are placed in bodies, they must then recall from their memory that which they once knew and memorised. It also is a reference to the things that man can learn about destiny and providence from …show more content…
She is deeply unhappy because the elements she must combine are warring with each other and thus are unwilling to be combined. There were still trace elements of the unordered Silva remaining in the elements. It is important to note that while both Nous and Physis deal with Silva, Physis’s task is different from Nous’s, in that objects of her creation are finite and in a constant state of becoming while the macro cosmos was infinite. Ultimately, man will be created with lesser versions of the same elements, which constitute the divine bodies above the