Those in opposition argue that Nozick inaccurately interprets the idea of a patterned principle as detailing the circulation of absolute entitlement to the money being distributed from game attendees to Chamberlain. The issue is that the absolute right over property would not be given to people under a partially free distribution, one that allows individuals to choose how they allocate their holdings. Nozick is suggesting the situation is a free distribution, while referring to the entitlement to the money as an absolute
Those in opposition argue that Nozick inaccurately interprets the idea of a patterned principle as detailing the circulation of absolute entitlement to the money being distributed from game attendees to Chamberlain. The issue is that the absolute right over property would not be given to people under a partially free distribution, one that allows individuals to choose how they allocate their holdings. Nozick is suggesting the situation is a free distribution, while referring to the entitlement to the money as an absolute