Preview

Nuclear

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
332 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear
Japan's prime minister, Shinzo Abe, has promised to act quickly to address the buildup of huge quantities of contaminated water at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.

Abe, who recently suggested that the plant's operator, Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco), was incapable of overseeing the operation on its own, said the government would soon announce a comprehensive plan to deal with the world's largest nuclear cleanup.

The prospect of greater state involvement in decommissioning Fukushima Daiichi – the scene of a triple meltdown after it was hit by a tsunami in March 2011 – comes amid growing concern that Tepco is ill-equipped to cope with the scale and complexity of the cleanup.

Those doubts were fuelled by evidence that the plant is seeping up to 300 tonnes of contaminated water into the Pacific Ocean every day. In a separate incident, a water storage tank was found to have leaked about 300 tonnes of highly toxic water, some of which could have found its way into the sea.

At the weekend, radiation near another tank was measured at 1,800 millisieverts an hour – a level that could kill an unprotected person in just four hours – and 18 times higher than previously thought.

Tepco had initially recorded radiation near the tank at about 100 millisieverts an hour, but admitted that this was because the equipment used could only read measurements up to that level. The latest reading came from a more advanced device capable of reading up to 10,000 millisieverts.

The buildup of water at the site is close to becoming unmanageable. Experts say that Tepco will soon be left with no choice but to release the water into the ocean or evaporate it.

At present, water is used to cool melted nuclear fuel in three reactor basements, where it becomes contaminated and then mixes with groundwater seeping down from the hills behind the plant. The site's tanks, basements and pits contain an estimated 338,000 tonnes of tainted water.

The chairman of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I don't think how it has that disposal it's not safe. There are a lot of crazy people that would want to do something like that you never know what they are capable of. It has a environmental impact as well. Counting the bombs they could make the reactors could blow up and all the nuclear energy and radioactive chemicals will wipe out an entire city harrisburg, and the town enola. So the fact that it's capable of producing a lot of energy and electricity it's not safe to be in that part of the city/town.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History CBA

    • 613 Words
    • 1 Page

    km wide and there are signs warning of radiation poisoning and increased risk of cancer.…

    • 613 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Radioactive gases from the reactor cooling system built up in the makeup tank in the auxiliary building. Operators used a system of pipes and compressors to move the gas to waste gas decay tanks. The compressors leaked, and some radioactive gas was released to the environment. These went through high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters and charcoal filters which removed most of the radionuclides, except for the noble gases, the estimated total of which was about 370 PBq (the Kemeny Commission said ‘a maximum of 480 PBq noble gases’ and NRC also quotes 1.6 PBq of krypton rlelease in July). With short half-life and being biologically inert, these did not pose a health hazard. An inter-agency analysis concluded that the accident did not raise radioactivity far enough above background levels to cause even one additional cancer death among the people in the area. The EPA found no contamination in water, soil, sediment or plant…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Environmental Protection Agency declared in 1993 that the site was mostly cleaned, mostly because the site still contained contaminated deep underwater deposits of toxins and by this time all the clean up was funded by taxpayers, The United State E.P.A Superfund.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Workbook EX 11 and 16

    • 1267 Words
    • 5 Pages

    a. Yes, bottle feeding was the most common type of feeding used in both the experimental and control group. The experimental group chose bottle 53.1%, breast feeding 40.6% and both 6.3%. The control group chose bottle 50.0%, breast feeding 41.7%, and both 5.6%. Each group had the highest use of bottle, second highest use of breast feeding,…

    • 1267 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People believe that nuclear power is clean and is good for the environment. Well, they are wrong because they don’t think of the water used to produce nuclear energy. Power plants use nuclear fission to heat up water into steam. The steam turns a turbine, which powers a generator, that produces electricity. The plant releases the water right back into the river while it is still hot. Consequently, the area around the river is very unpopulated due to the organisms’ contact with the hot water, because organisms in the area die in the hot water that they come in contact…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hypothyroidism

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When earthquakes damaged the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactors in March 2011, a large quantity of radioactive caesium-137 and iodine-131 were released into the water supply. The Japanese government was accused of responding too slowly, and for not administering iodide prophylaxis to the exposed population.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill Mckiibben Waste

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With all the money, we spend on the nuclear industry they nor the government have come up with a plan to get rid of the waste that does not involve dumping it in the ocean or the desert. McKibben states, “Congress is being lobbied really, really hard to fork over billions of dollars to the nuclear industry” (333). One thing about nuclear energy that can never be forgotten is the fact it can be turned into a weapon. The destruction nuclear weapons can cause is and always will be horrifying. During World War 2 a nuclear bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The bomb destroyed most of their island, killed most of their population, and left the country filled with radiation. Nuclear weapons can cause radiation sickness, different forms of cancer, and malformations to children ("What's the Damage?"). Even factories that use nuclear energy are harmful they destroy soil used for farming and water sources. Nuclear energy contains elements such as uranium, strontium, benzene and many others ("What's the Damage?"). These are the materials that keep nuclear energy radioactive even after it is disposed of, plus it can cause birth…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s also very high for human body as head CT scan has only 2 millisieverts. To know exact finding for the radiation we have to know about tooth enamel as per Nori Nakamura. It’s not so easy to find the intact tooth and the rain fell after the bombing how much radiation it brought with it, how can we know about it. Radiation not just affects the DNA directly, it also affects the cell machinery and alters the genes on and off programming which leads to the uncontrolled production of proteins. Sometimes the cell beside the damaged cell kills it for the protection of the mechanism. Researchers are indicating that low radiation unlikely to harmful and even protects from higher rates of radiation collected later by triggering the genes need in radiation defense. Many researchers have made the foundation and observe the people who are generally exposed to the lower radiation. Low radiation has become now a regular process. It was named the research as “million worker study”. I have come to know many things in this assignment like new terminology, new…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If we do not act now, our ocean as we have come to know and love will not be around for future generations to explore and love themselves. And cleaning up our oceans is just as easy to do as throw out a piece…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Where an earthquake measuring 9 on the Richter scale caused severe damage to the nuclear powerplant. This was coupled with a large tsunami which led to a meltdown of 3 of the reactors at the Nuclear Power plant. The disaster spurned the public on in some European nations to demand an end of the use of Nuclear Power as an energy source, which led to national administrations amending their plans for the sector on a temporary basis. And the high-profile nature of the disaster encouraged the European union to take strong action on the issue of nuclear safety since before this piece of legislation the European Union made little attempt in the past on regulating safety standards in this sector. The stress test report organised by the European Nuclear Safety Regulatory Group (ENSREG) showed the situation which the Nuclear energy sector found itself in the months and years after the melt down at the Fukishima Nuclear Power station. What’s interesting here is that the issue of nuclear power rarely made it onto the agenda of the European Authorities, it was a competency which was largely at the behest of the national administrations. In developing this policy…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island

    • 3044 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Though we have had worries and issues on how to handle our power situation in the future, nuclear power has always been a sparkling prospect. It has been gleaming there just waiting to be tapped. After the bombs and destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki the world started to explore other avenues to use the science and power of atoms and came to discover nuclear power. Although this technology seemed like a god sent, there are inherent problems with the use and deployment of nuclear power. These problems have the potential to cause significant loss of life. In fact they have caused the loss of life before. Due to these issues, nuclear policy has always been a hotbed of debate. In actuality only several of the hundreds of reactors in existence have had problems. The first noteworthy accident and the one that will be discussed today was the accident at the Three Mile Island complex, here in the USA. Another accident occurred several years after at the Chernobyl compound. This accident which took place in the former USSR is the worse reactor accident to date and massive casualties were incurred. In addition to these; the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, which occurred earlier this month has put several reactors there in potentially an even worse place than Chernobyl. Focusing on Three Mile Island, this almost horrific accident occurred in the late seventies and was very close to going super critical (i.e. that is melting down). This accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear complex has greatly affected the United States of America and international nuclear policy. In the USA no reactors have been built since this accident. The accident reignited people’s fears of nuclear power. Stepping back for a minute, nuclear power first started evolving in the 1950’s. While research in this area had been done well before the fifties it was all for the purpose of academic and military use. This…

    • 3044 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant also known as Fukushima Dai-ichi (dai-ichi means "number one"), is a disabled nuclear power plant located on a 3.5-square-kilometre (860-acre) site[1] in the towns of Okuma and Futaba in the Futaba District of Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. First commissioned in 1971, the plant consists of six boiling water reactors (BWR). These light water reactors drove electrical generators with a combined power of 4.7 GWe, making Fukushima Daiichi one of the 15 largest nuclear power stations in the world. Fukushima I was the first nuclear plant to be designed, constructed and run in conjunction with General Electric, Boise, and Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO).[3]…

    • 5782 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Half Life Experiment

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to my data no my hypothesis was not correct because the number of candies removed after each shaking…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nuclear Waste

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In one of his lectures “Nuclear Waste” Richard A. Muller, discussing the nuclear waste problem, scientists’ attempts to find the solution, and the public’s fear around it, gives the audience his personal evaluation. He makes a point that since the nuclear waste is here, we have to store it and storing at Yucca Mountain is not the worst option, because the dangers of storing it there is smaller than the dangers of not doing so. This lecture makes me recall the tragic event in my country when one of the nuclear reactors exploded at Chernobyl nuclear plant in 1986. The consequences of this accident were and still are terrible for people and the environment in Ukraine and in surrounding countries. Furthermore, recent consequences of earthquakes and tsunamis in Japan at Fukushima nuclear plant increase the importance of the scientific debate against nuclear power, and force people around the world to come out against the nuclear power. People using nuclear power cannot control the whole process of its generation, as well as they do not know what to do with nuclear waste. Since we have nuclear waste, we are facing the necessity of disposing it. Muller notes that storing nuclear waste will not seem such unacceptable if we evaluate the danger of waste storage in comparison with two other dangers: the danger of the uranium originally mined, and the danger of the natural uranium left in the soil. The point is that we cannot guarantee the absolute security, but even the nature cannot; and the possible waste leakage is not a kind of danger that cannot be minimized.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays