Preview

Nuclear Chemistry

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
600 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Chemistry
Nuclear Chemistry
Imagine the majority of Earth being quarantined off and people having to live in specified areas to avoid harmful radiation that originated from nuclear energy/waste. The integration of nuclear energy/medicine is largely controversial among people. Every side to the argument has its benefits as well as its negative consequences. Nuclear energy should not be used in society because of the threat it poses to thousands of people. In contrast, nuclear medicine has positive aspects that could benefit people and save thousands of lives.
I do not support the use of nuclear chemistry in our society. My first claim is the potential of danger from terrorists. Nuclear material has always been a high priority target for people who want to cause destruction. With the building of power plants full of nuclear energy, we’re basically handing over that power to the terrorists. Even without the threat of that energy falling into the wrong hands, people are still in danger from the facility. Workers who maintain and run the plant have a high probability of being exposed to the harmful radiation that is emitted from the fuel rods. If exposed, the individual will get a chance of death, serious disease, or biological issues that can appear years down the road. Nuclear chemistry should not be used due to the high potential of harm it causes to people.
In correlation to my views, I think if we must deal with nuclear waste at all, there are specific ways to go about doing it. Disposing of nuclear waste needs to be in the least harmful way towards the environment. The waste should always be put into the safest containers possible and stored in the most isolated areas so as to prevent any radiation leakage to anyone. Secondly, I think more money should be directed towards research on safety and proper care of nuclear waste. The more we learn about nuclear chemistry and nuclear waste, the safer we can all be. Nuclear waste should not be put aside or quick to dispose of.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    nuclear chem webquest

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    9) Hydrogen Bombs are created by fusion of two isotopes of hydrogen, deuterium and tritium…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Yucca Mountain

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The amount of nuclear waste produced every year is too much to deal with but there has to be a way to store it. Most countries store their waste in insoluble glasses and put them in stainless steel containers and place them deep underground in a stable rock structure away from…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem of radioactive waste is still an unsolved one. The waste from nuclear energy is extremely dangerous and it has to be carefully looked after for several thousand years (10'000 years according to United States Environmental Protection Agency standards).…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First off all, what is the nuclear? Many countries use nuclear energy to generate electricity. “Unclear is the energy stored in the center or the nucleus of an atom. After we bombard the nucleus into two parts, two different elements are formed along with the emission of high energy. The process generally followed is called fission. Fission is the chain reaction which needs uranium-235.”(“Fission and fusion”)The nuclear energy is considered as the worthiest alternative resource of energy after fossil fuels, but it also has a lot of potential problems.”(“Nuclear Energy”)…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear waste is dangerous just about anyone knows that. But is it really that dangerous or is it simply overstated? The answer to this question is a heated debate that involves everybody from politicians pushing for policy they don’t really understand to scientists who are trying to understand it to the public who take everything they hear as the truth. Honestly, I don’t even know if I can iron out the edges of this frenzied debate. Everyone, and that includes me, has their own perspective of the issue of nuclear waste, and their own idea of what to do about it.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over centuries humans have always continued to try and find new ways of converting one form of energy into one which humans can manipulate for their own use. One of the most recent forms of converting energy, which is gaining in popularity is nuclear energy. With 14 percent of the world using it today it is a viable alternative to burning fossil fuels. To give you a basic idea on how the process of converting energy works according to the Canadian Nuclear Association is as basic as, “splitting the uranium atom to generate the heat that is used to produce steam for the production of electricity”(www.cna.ca). However things do not always run so smoothly, and the leakage of the nuclear material could have devastating consequences to both the land and its inhabitants. One of the bigger well know events of this nature, came from the power plant Chernobyl. To put simply it is a plant that exploded releasing nuclear waste into the atmosphere. Although this is detrimental to the environment the significance behind this event is because of this accident, we have now learned from our mistakes and are taking more precautions so that history is not repeated. I will prove that history will not be repeated through some background knowledge of the plant, what happened during the meltdown and how it effected the land and inhabitants, and finally what insight we have gained from this event and its significance to history.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill Mckiibben Waste

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With all the money, we spend on the nuclear industry they nor the government have come up with a plan to get rid of the waste that does not involve dumping it in the ocean or the desert. McKibben states, “Congress is being lobbied really, really hard to fork over billions of dollars to the nuclear industry” (333). One thing about nuclear energy that can never be forgotten is the fact it can be turned into a weapon. The destruction nuclear weapons can cause is and always will be horrifying. During World War 2 a nuclear bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The bomb destroyed most of their island, killed most of their population, and left the country filled with radiation. Nuclear weapons can cause radiation sickness, different forms of cancer, and malformations to children ("What's the Damage?"). Even factories that use nuclear energy are harmful they destroy soil used for farming and water sources. Nuclear energy contains elements such as uranium, strontium, benzene and many others ("What's the Damage?"). These are the materials that keep nuclear energy radioactive even after it is disposed of, plus it can cause birth…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If nuclear waste is harmful it should not be stored by humans, but in less to non-populated areas. “Spent nuclear fuel remains highly dangerous for prolonged periods. It has long lived radioactive materials in it that can contaminate the environment and harm public health” (USA Today). Thousands of Americans are exposed to nuclear waste sites across the country. And if we do not take action to find somewhere else to store this waste. Many innocent people will be affected in the long run.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Micro Macro Dilemma

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nuclear power has some short-term benefits but these come along with long-term effects that are costly to society in the long run. Nuclear power is resourceful and maintainable source for energy, which makes it a practical alternative to other sources of energy. It is a cheaper source of energy, requires little raw materials for production and…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Plants

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The question of whether the U.S. should have nuclear power plants is very controversial. There are two sides that one can take; however, both sides have their own share of problems. If you chose to not have nuclear plants, then eventually all natural resources will run out. The oil supply will run out relatively soon, and all other sources will run out too. The natural resources that we have now are still harmful to the earth however. The gas which we use for our cars pollutes the air and considering the amount of cars the are driven each day, it is ripping apart the o-zone layer. However, if the U.S. does decide to use nuclear plants, then there is a great danger of toxic waste invading our rivers, and also the chance of a spill similar to Chernobyl. As we saw in the Chernobyl video, there is great danger when using nuclear energy. If this were to happen is the United States, the risk of mortality is much higher because the area's in which there would be a plant such as a big city are very densely populated. Because of these facts, I do not think that the U.S. should renew its efforts to develop more nuclear plants.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think the benefits of nuclear power definitely outweigh the potentional dangers. Nuclear power is a very efficient source of energy. For example, it can be used to provide electricity for cities. Nuclear reactors would split radioactive elements to form heat, which would produce steam to turn turbines. Then electricity would be created to power major towns and cities. We do not need to worry about nuclear meltdowns because of the safety measures in nuclear reactors. The Chernobyl accident would be a thing of the past.…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Each individual have different opinions. Some may reject my thesis because nuclear weapons introduced us to a new source of energy as I mentioned earlier, nuclear energy. Nuclear energy was the new hope of solving our global warming problem and cheap power. Although it doesn’t release carbon emissions, toxic waste and radiation are still produced after the reaction. These toxic wastes are more harmful than carbon emissions because of its ability to contaminate humans through inhalation or absorption. In addition, these wastes stay radioactive for thousands of years.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Reconstruction Agency, the number of the Great East Japan Earthquake related death was about 3523 in 2016, and the number of people who died from the nuclear accident was about 1368 in 2016(Tokyo Shimbun). This means that 40% of the Earthquake’s death come from the nuclear accident. Also, according to the Hoki net, the death rate of cardiovascular system diseases of Fukushima became 1.45 times of the national average after the nuclear accident. It is said that the polluted radiation from the accident is the reason to this increase. Since nuclear energy can harm humans in many ways, they should be banned in…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Technology English Speech

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Let’s talk about the negative issues. Nuclear technology has many vital applications in modern society, such as nuclear weapons, nuclear medicine, and nuclear power. The most controversial of these is, without a doubt, nuclear weapons. It was first created by the United States in 1945 during World War II. A weapon of incredible power, a single nuclear weapon has the potential to decimate and destroy an entire city. The first and only times a nuclear weapon has been used are in World War II, when the US bombed the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. A great number of lives were lost, and a lot of families were left to suffer long after the incident, as the nuclear bomb didn’t only destroyed the cities and killed many people, but also leaves radiation which could cause diseases in the future.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays