Preview

Nuclear Power In China

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
635 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Power In China
Nuclear power in China
Make haste slowly
China’s rush to build nuclear power plants is dangerous
Dec 6th 2014

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21635487-chinas-rush-build-nuclear-power-plants-dangerous-make-haste-slowly
COAL kills, especially in China. Up to half a million people die prematurely each year as a result of the country’s infamously foul air. Coal, from which China gets roughly four-fifths of its electricity, is the main contributor to that deadly pollution. And since the country’s power-generation may need to double by 2030 to keep pace with economic growth and more affluent lifestyles, the damage from coal will get worse before it gets better. Given that grim picture, it is understandable that the government wants to diversify its energy sources.
Nuclear power is central to this ambition. Even as doubts about it grow in the rest of the world, China has made its expansion a priority. With over two dozen reactors under construction, it wants to more than triple nuclear capacity by 2020. On December 10th China General Nuclear Power (CGN), the country’s biggest builder and operator of nuclear plants, plans to float shares on the Hong Kong stock exchange (see article). Since the government has no need for outside investors to fund its nuclear ambitions, CGN’s partial flotation is a statement of the industry’s political profile.
For most countries nuclear power is a poor option. Big reactors invariably cost more and take longer to build than predicted. As alternative sources of energy have proliferated, the economics of nuclear energy have worsened. The other worry is safety. Just as the memory of the Fukushima disaster in Japan was starting to fade, Europe’s biggest nuclear reactor, in Ukraine, was shut down this week. Such worries increase the risk of politicians cancelling projects, which also raises the costs.
China, however, faces none of these constraints. The government is willing to pay for countless loss-making infrastructure projects, most

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Due by Day 7 . Nuclear Power . All energy sources have drawbacks. Even the clean hydropower option has negative ramifications. Weigh those against the possible consequences of developing nuclear power, a controversial alternative to fossil fuels. Discuss the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster as well as the 20th century Chernobyl nuclear meltdown in drawing conclusions about risk versus reward of nuclear energy use. The paper must be two to three pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least one ...…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are further issues implied by the trend shown for nuclear power. The use of nuclear power has fluctuated in the past 60 years, rising by 10 million tonnes between 1970 and 1990, and then decreasing back 10 million tonnes by 2030. This is because the first stations in operation at 1990 had a short life and are now beginning to expire. This poses an issue for energy security in the UK as even with immediate investment into nuclear energy; the stations take 15-20 years to build. This leaves a gap as shown in the trend (nuclear only at 10 million tonnes in 2030) where the UK will be without nuclear power, irrelevant of…

    • 619 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to remain at the forefront of technological innovation and industrial prowess, the United States must become cognizant that the use of nuclear energy is by far the most efficient policy regarding the creation of power despite the possible risks. This is the belief of William Tucker, the author of the New York Times published article, “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even after Fukushima”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear powers biggest threat is from the public’s perception of it. As seen in Germany as well as throughout Europe, if the public deems something too unsafe and does not want to live near it, the governments will have no choice but to shut down the plants and look for different sources of energy. Compared to biofuels and solar power, nuclear power is already extremely established and generates a large share of the worlds’ power, and faces most of its issues in the political realm instead of the practical…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island Effects

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Todd H. Otis, A Review Of Nuclear Energy in the United States: Hidden Power, (New York, NY: Praeger Publishers,…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global nuclear power plants and its industry have been a high expense for government subsidies,tax credit, or any form of public support in favor of the industry. A half century later, we have noticed that nuclear power is, instead, too expensive to finance. The first generation of nuclear power plants proved so costly to build that half of them were abandoned during construction. In addition , huge cost overruns are discovered which were passed on to utility customers…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear Energy Policy

    • 16160 Words
    • 65 Pages

    Nuclear energy issues facing Congress include federal incentives for new commercial reactors, radioactive waste management policy, research and development priorities, power plant safety and regulation, nuclear weapons proliferation, and security against terrorist attacks. Significant incentives for new commercial reactors were included in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT05, P.L. 109-58). These include production tax credits, loan guarantees, insurance against regulatory delays, and extension of the Price-Anderson Act nuclear liability system. Together with higher fossil fuel prices and the possibility of greenhouse gas controls, the federal incentives for nuclear power have helped spur renewed interest by utilities and other potential reactor developers. Plans for as many as 31 reactor license applications have been announced, although it is unclear how many of those projects will move forward. In his January 2010 State of the Union Address, President Obama called for “building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants” as a key component of his “clean energy” program. Financing for new reactors is widely considered to depend on the loan guarantees authorized by EPACT05 Title XVII, administered by the Department of Energy (DOE). The total amount of loan guarantees to be provided to nuclear power projects has been a continuing congressional issue. Nuclear power plants are currently allocated $18.5 billion in loan guarantees, enough for three or four reactors. President Obama’s FY2011 budget request would nearly triple the loan guarantee ceiling for nuclear power plants, to $54.5 billion. However, opponents of nuclear power contend that the Administration’s proposed increases in nuclear loan guarantees…

    • 16160 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nucleat Power in Australia

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Currently, an increasing number of countries have developed nuclear power and adopted nuclear power as their main source of power. However, not all countries support the development of nuclear power. A great deal of residents concerns which have swept across much of the developed world was caused by the growing nuclear industry overseas (Falk ,Green & Mudd 2006).In Australia, nuclear power is not used due to the worries about safety and pollution, but some experts point out that the perception about nuclear power should change, because it is possible that the use of electricity in Australia will double during the period from 2040 to 2050 relative to what it is today (Switkowski 2007).Opinions on whether Australia should adopt nuclear power as main source of power are divided. The controversy has become more heated following the growing concerns that traditional energy is running out. A majority of individuals tend to insist that Australia should not develop nuclear power. However, this essay will discuss that Australia should adopt nuclear power for several reasons: the raw materials of nuclear power, uranium, is abundant in Australia, and to a large extent, nuclear power is more environmentally-friendly and it can bring a lot of economic benefits for Australia, furthermore, the safety concerns are being addressed more effectively over time.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canada 10% o South Africa 10% Uranium enrichment: ore is refined to increase concentration of U-­‐235 and processed into small pellets Nuclear reactor: device that initiates and maintains controlled nuclear fission chain reaction to produce electricity Pellets that are packed into fuel rod and grouped into fuel assemblies 200 rods per assembly and 150-­‐200 assemblies per reactor Final steps of fuel cycle: o Radioactive “spent” fuel must be safely stored for thousands of years o Nuclear plants must be retired after life span (15-­‐60 years) – radioactive materials must be stored or disposed of Nuclear power today: US: 104 nuclear reactors in 31 states o Accounts for 8-­‐9% of overall energy and 19-­‐20% of all electricity • France: 59 reactors – 77% of all electricity Controversies over nuclear energy 1.) Costs: Why so expensive? o Up front costs high – so delays very expensive o Technology is complex o Decommissioning expensive o Regulatory compliance expensive • Nuclear power plants require government $$$ – would not exist without government support! • 2.)…

    • 7330 Words
    • 249 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island

    • 3044 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Though we have had worries and issues on how to handle our power situation in the future, nuclear power has always been a sparkling prospect. It has been gleaming there just waiting to be tapped. After the bombs and destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki the world started to explore other avenues to use the science and power of atoms and came to discover nuclear power. Although this technology seemed like a god sent, there are inherent problems with the use and deployment of nuclear power. These problems have the potential to cause significant loss of life. In fact they have caused the loss of life before. Due to these issues, nuclear policy has always been a hotbed of debate. In actuality only several of the hundreds of reactors in existence have had problems. The first noteworthy accident and the one that will be discussed today was the accident at the Three Mile Island complex, here in the USA. Another accident occurred several years after at the Chernobyl compound. This accident which took place in the former USSR is the worse reactor accident to date and massive casualties were incurred. In addition to these; the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, which occurred earlier this month has put several reactors there in potentially an even worse place than Chernobyl. Focusing on Three Mile Island, this almost horrific accident occurred in the late seventies and was very close to going super critical (i.e. that is melting down). This accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear complex has greatly affected the United States of America and international nuclear policy. In the USA no reactors have been built since this accident. The accident reignited people’s fears of nuclear power. Stepping back for a minute, nuclear power first started evolving in the 1950’s. While research in this area had been done well before the fifties it was all for the purpose of academic and military use. This…

    • 3044 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Energy Market

    • 6329 Words
    • 26 Pages

    “G8 split on nuclear power in energy security talks.” EU Business. March 16, 2006. Available at: http://www.eubusiness.com/Energy/060316103012.mt2l023a.…

    • 6329 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clean Coal

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the past decade global warming, and the potential dangers that goes with it has been a topic, which needs to be fixed. Clean coal technologies (CCN) are methods that will lead to mankind taking a huge step in the right direction. First, the basic definition of CCT is the process of cleaning coal, so when it is used it will not damage the atmosphere. Second, after the coal is purified, there are two ways of containing the poisons. Finally, when CCT is perfected, how can leading companies implement their ideas to foreign nations, so the world will benefit as a whole. In conclusion, the environment is in trouble, and clean coal use is an alternative, which will get our global community on the right track for generations to come.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear energy has a significant role in the economy. The nuclear energy industry leads to job creation and economic growth. 400 to 700 permanent jobs are required by the operation of one nuclear power plant (Nuclear Energy Institute, 2014). There are more than 63,000 highly skilled workers involved in the civil nuclear industry throughout the UK. In addition, there over 80,000 jobs linked to the industry directly or indirectly (Nuclear Industry Association, n.d.). Nevertheless, a large amount of money will be invested due to the expanding of nuclear energy. For example, experts have forecasted that approximately 1180 billion of pound will be invested in building new nuclear reactors and decommissioning those coming off line over the next 20 years (Nuclear Industry Association, n.d.).…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power has been around for quite a while and it’s about time to tap this untouched resource. With this power crisis in front of the Philippines, to look for a plausible answer to the problem requires us to think outside the box, look around and search for the most suitable power source for us. We’ve tapped geothermal energy, solar energy, and wind energy; and at the end of the list, we have no choice but to look at nuclear power. This paper explains why it is not so much a bad idea to spend time and money for nuclear energy.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics