nuclear reactor
I believe that a nuclear reactor would be manageable for our community, Lowell. It has been in other places before, and nothing has happened to us most of the time. It’s great as it can produce lots of energy from a very small amount of atoms. It is a neutral energy source which means it gives off the same amount of carbon that it saves. Nuclear reactor is not very expensive which can help our economy expand. Lowell can make more profit and get even further out of the recession we found ourselves in the past. This will benefit us a lot as we can sort more problems that our community is facing. The Benefits of economy are that more jobs will be made if we create more nuclear power plants, we can have less unemployment meaning more families will get out of debt and again Lowell will somewhat have more money. Also, the fact that nuclear plants are quite hightech could mean that we make more important and scientific discoveries.
"In a number of cases, plant owners took proactive measures such as conducting inspections for or training staff to prevent problems experienced at other plants. In other cases, plant owners looked beyond single problems to seek out and correct related problems. Not only were problems resolved completely, but the likelihood of future problems was greatly reduced." The actions reflect a healthyand necessaryattitude toward nuclear safety. In addition, most problems at the bestperforming plants (Oconee, Oyster Creek, and Surry) were not a very big deal. They were discovered quickly and fixed properly, suggesting a healthy regard for the importance of safety at all levels. Such actions demonstrate that safe performance levels can be achieved. "Some industries has persevered, claiming that improved oversight and potential to improve air quality." Even though it has not cleared for the disposing of its radioactive waste. Today, 104
nuclear reactors in 31 states supply 20 percent of our electricity, making it our
"In a number of cases, plant owners took proactive measures such as conducting inspections for or training staff to prevent problems experienced at other plants. In other cases, plant owners looked beyond single problems to seek out and correct related problems. Not only were problems resolved completely, but the likelihood of future problems was greatly reduced." The actions reflect a healthyand necessaryattitude toward nuclear safety. In addition, most problems at the bestperforming plants (Oconee, Oyster Creek, and Surry) were not a very big deal. They were discovered quickly and fixed properly, suggesting a healthy regard for the importance of safety at all levels. Such actions demonstrate that safe performance levels can be achieved. "Some industries has persevered, claiming that improved oversight and potential to improve air quality." Even though it has not cleared for the disposing of its radioactive waste. Today, 104
nuclear reactors in 31 states supply 20 percent of our electricity, making it our
Bibliography: "Nuclear Energy: Good or Bad?" MNN. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2014. "Is Nuclear Power Bad for the Environment?" The Premier Online Debate Website. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2014.