Preview

Nuclear science

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1025 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear science
Nuclear Energy

How could we save our world if we keep on polluting it every second we speak of saving it? Pollution is the biggest problem the earth face, if it keeps on going, there won’t be an earth to live in. Cleaning up all that pollution in the atmosphere. We need an efficient, reliable and quick way to clean up the world’s pollution problem, and nuclear energy is the right choice. By using Nuclear energy we could produce less environmental pollution, and reduce the speed and amount of pollution spread to the atmosphere. Even though it does produce chemical waste that needs to be kept away or else it would danger civilization, nuclear energy is a faster and more efficient energy than any other power sources, compared to electricity, efficiency, less pollution etc. One of the worse things if nuclear energy is more advanced is that for militaristic purposes, such as nuclear missiles, submarines, bombs etc. Although everything has its benefits it also brings conflicts, but we need a way that could clean up the earth first and save our environment or else there wouldn’t be an earth to live in.

The nuclear energy plants uses five steps of energy transfer; Nuclear energy, heat energy, steam energy, kinetic energy and electrical energy. While the Nuclear energy works it powers the nuclear plant creating nuclear energy, transferring to heat energy in the coolant, potential energy from steam moves the turbine with kinetic energy from the turbine then produces electrical energy by spinning the turbine using steam. This process produces less environmental pollution than coal energy; which is a popular energy that is cheap and easy to use but also dangerous because of the amount of pollution it could produce along with the energy, but it does create chemical waste that needs to be stored with caution underground, it also doesn’t create green house or acid rain effect. Using Nuclear energy not only deducts the chance of global warming, but also could generate a



Bibliography: 1. "Nuclear Power." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 05 July 2012. Web. 08 May 2012. . 2. "GeekWeek." 20 Greatest Stage To Screen Adaptations -. Web. 06 May 2012. . 3. "Science Clarified." Pollution Control. Web. 14 May 2012. . 4. "Why Nuclear Power - Comparisons of Various Energy Sources." Why Nuclear Power - Comparisons of Various Energy Sources. Web. 14 May 2012. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island Effects

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The use of Nuclear Power has always been a controversial subject, but during the technology’s…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power does not put out green house gasses, nuclear power does not pollute our water, and unlike some people believe nuclear power does not release toxic gasses into the air. Some people believe that it produces toxic gases into the air because they see the white clouds that come out of the top of the power plant cooling towers, but in fact those white clouds are actually just the water vapor that has been used to cool the systems, it is not toxic and therefore does not pollute the air. Nuclear energy uses either plutonium or uranium, depending on the type of the reactor. Nuclear reactors produce less waste than any other type of energy source. One pound of plutonium can produce the same amount of energy as 50,000 barrels of oil. The number of deaths caused by coal powered plants is about 24,000 a year. There were only 56 direct deaths caused by the Chernobyl reactor meltdown. Fukushima had no direct deaths, and the only other reported deaths were of the 3 men who were testing a portable reactor in Arco, Idaho. Arco was also the very first city in the world to be powered by nuclear…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Humans have always tried to find innovative, powerful and valid energy sources in order to be able to supply the several needs of modern societies. In this sense, nuclear power is considered one of the most controversial technologies related to the new millennium.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fission and Fusion

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Article 2: “Should the world increase its reliance on nuclear energy?” The beginning of this article gives brief examples of the pros and cons of nuclear reactors from both sides. Opponents cite the case of the recent Japanese power plant disaster and dangers of Iran’s formation of nuclear power. Proponents argue that the backlash is overblown. They say how there have been no measured effects of human…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mariotte, Michael. “Second Thoughts on Nuclear Power.” Futurist Nov. 2009: 23. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Dec. 2009. <http://search.ebscohost.com/‌login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=44523422&site=ehost-live>.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The good things about nuclear energy start with the environmental benefits. If done right, nuclear power will emit less than one one-hundredth of the green house gasses than coal or gas power. Coal and oil plants emit large amounts of CO2, which is proven to cause global warming, while nuclear energy creates no CO2 emissions. Compared to coal, natural gas, wind, and solar power, nuclear energy per kWh (kilowatt-hour) is the cheapest to produce. Although the running cost of nuclear power plants is already low, we are striving to lower the cost further by using new technology and by trying to better understand how nuclear energy works.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final Critical Assignment

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main issue of the article is whether or not we should increasingly rely on nuclear power and make it our No1 source of energy given endless concerns about its safety and expensive cost. Undoubtedly, in a world of increasing population, diminishing natural resources and worsening climate change, nuclear energy is considered the key future energy resolution. In favor of greater reliance on nuclear energy, Mark Lynas – a climate-science author strongly brought in the reasons of: 1st, nuclear power avoiding climate change while fossil fuels have failed to do so and green energy capability is still being questioned; 2nd, opponents overstating danger even after many reactors has been safety improved; 3rd, the cost is acceptable comparing to other renewables energy. In contrast, Peter A.Bradford – former commissioner of the U.S.Nulear Regulatory Commission insisted in the alternatives, arguing that nuclear power is too costly to be pursued, not to mention its danger and potential severe impacts on people’s health. Obviously, the need of understanding the issue from comprehensive perspectives with substantial data support is essential to weigh the risks and benefits of each opinion.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power does not produce carbon dioxide or sulphur dioxide and so does not contribute to global warming or acid rain.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In these days, weather crisis has been increasing dramatically due to our pollution. There are around 437 nuclear power plants around the world and 66 under construction (). Do you think that nuclear power is useful and preferable to use in our daily life by building nuclear reactors? It is a debatable issue; with some people in favor of this idea and others opposed to it. According to Riccio, nuclear reactors are dangerous and expensive to construct (Riccio, 2011). However, the safety instructions must be followed and the financial problem is easy to solve. So, nuclear reactors should be built to produce electricity for several…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to Nuclear Power there are a lot of advantages and disadvantages. One of the best advantages it there are no fossil fuels being burned. This thus results in less air pollution. There are also economic advantages as well, because fossil fuels can be a great alternative energy source. Let’s not forget that there are many disadvantages as well. Making Nuclear power is very complex and extremely dangerous which causes for expensive security precautions. In 1986 in the Ukraine a nuclear reactor melted down resulting in numerous deaths and long term radiation effects. It is considered as one of the world’s worst nuclear catastrophes ever. It shed light to how dangerous nuclear power can be when not properly monitored and controlled. To make nuclear power, atoms must first…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Us Nuclar Power Plants

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Energy is a controversial topic in the United States and the rest of the world. More than half of the energy we have comes from coal burning power plants. President Obama is working along with government agencies to build more nuclear power plants in the United States. Nuclear power plants produce large quantities of energy creating no air pollution and very little water pollution in the form of thermal pollution. The United States should build more Nuclear power plants, they are good for the environment unlike coal burning power plants which are major producer of carbon dioxide and contributor of mercury in our waterways; they produce a lot of energy, they don’t produce any air pollution or greenhouse gases, and the little pollution they create can be safely stored and carefully contained.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays