John Steinbeck’s novel carries of lot of symbolism on its pages. It is owing to these symbols the author revealed the characters to the reader. One of the most important symbols of the novel is the symbolism of the Candy’s dog. As Candy’s dog is no longer needed and has given birth to new strong sheepdogs the only possible resolution is to kill the “unnecessary” animal. This killing is hidden behind the motive of not making the dog suffer. Once somebody becomes weak – he is no longer needed. Though Candy loves his dog he does not stop Carlson from killing it. The key of this symbolism is that Candy himself is an “old sheepdog” and Lennie becomes an “old sheepdog” at the end of the novel.…
I believe george was justified in shooting lennie, george realized he would not want anyone killing lennie for something he did not mean to do. But also george knew if anything was to happen to him lennie would not be able to live on his own.…
It’s true that George left Lennie unsupervised and he also killed his best friend; however, George was justified in killing Lennie.…
Candy’s Dog-foreshadowing for George and Lennie and Candy, old/out of use so it is killed, brings out the brutality/carelessness in human nature (Carlson)…
Throughout chapter one George and Lennie discuss the incident that happened in weed, and we begin to see George lose control when he says to Lennie, “Oh, so ya forgot that too, did ya? Well, I ain’t gonna remind ya, fear ya do it again” (Steinbeck 7). When George says this it shows how much he’s concerned with something like it, or something worse happening again. By the end of the book Lennie has killed multiple mice, a puppy, and a woman, George knows Lennie will never overcome his disability which will result in him killing again. Therefore, George had to end Lennie’s life to protect himself, and other people from his destructive…
What George did to his friend Lennie was all that he could do and George had no other choice. In the story Of Mice and Men, written by John Steinbeck, George has to kill his friend Lennie because there a mod coming after Lennie trying to kill him. George sees no other option but to kill him before the mob gets to him. Lennie has also hurt too many helpless things, he killed mice, a puppy, and now a human. Lennie has never been punished for his actions and unfortunately it had to come to this. What George did to Lennie was completely justified…
One reason george should not have killed Lennie is because Lennie did not realize how strong he really was. As steinbeck writes, “He shook her then, and he was angry with her. And then she was still, for Lennie had broken her neck”(91) this shows that Lennie was trying to get her to stop screaming, but instead accidentally broke her neck. Also Lennie says, “I’d pet ‘em, and pretty soon they bit my fingers and I pinched their heads a little and they they was dead because they was so little”(Steinbeck 10).…
Many believe that it is immoral if George to kill Lennie. Despite the fact that he is killing him and killing is thought to be morally forbidden, one needs to understand why he thinks its the best thing to do. George is doing what he thinks is right. It is not immoral of George to kill Lennie.…
First of all, George is right to kill Lennie because George wants to protect Lennie from suffering a painful death. If Lennie is caught…
In John Steinbeck 's classic novella, Of Mice and Men, one of the predominant themes that govern the story and characters in the book is friendship. One of the ways in which friendship plays a large role is in the area of mercy killing, which affects the main characters as well as the supporting ones. The two major mercy killings that occur in the book are those of Carlson 's killing of Candy 's old dog, and of George 's killing of Lennie. In both of these examples, the killer kills the other out of mercy and love, not for the usual motives of hatred, rage, anger, etc.…
One reason why killing is justified is that Lennie was not smart. He had some issues with him, he would kill pets by petting them to hard. He got mice that he killed and he killed his puppy. He forgets stuff too for example, “George… I ain’t got mine. I musta lost it.’ … ‘You never had none, you crazy bastard. I got both of ‘em here’” (Steinback 5). Lennie can’t take care of himself so, if George dies or gets hurt, no one is looking after Lennie and he could get himself in trouble, hurt, or killed. Therefore, George killing Lennie was justified because Lennie wasn’t smart.…
The story takes place during the 1930s at a small ranch south of Soledad, California. The country was struggling through the Great Depression and focused on isolationism, preferring to settle troubles at home rather than the rising crisis in Europe. Though, the Eugenics Movement, a movement based on the idea of improving the human race through selective breeding – largely seen in Nazi Germany, was also beginning to spread in the United States. Stemming from the Eugenics Movement, public talk of euthanasia also dramatically increased. Due to the subtle ideologies of the Eugenics Movement and the ending reference of euthanasia, modern interpretations of the book will greatly differ from thoughts from the books original release. because of the…
[Candy] said miserably, "You seen what they done to my dog tonight? They says he wasn't no good to himself nor nobody else”(Steinbeck 60). Candy is introduced in the start of chapter two, he is described indirectly by the narrator as a “Stoop shouldered old man”(Steinbeck 18). He is said to have a round stump on his right arm, but no hand. His dog enters later in chapter two, whom is described as a “dragfooted sheepdog, gray of a muzzle, and with pale, old eyes”(Steinbeck 26). Through these characters, Steinbeck helps the reader understand the stereotype of the uselessness of the elderly and disabled. Along with this, Candy and his dog create a parallel with George and Lennie.…
And most importantly, Lennie felt no pain when George rightfully killed him. In of mice and men George states “right in the back of the head.” (Steinbeck). Lennie didn’t even know what was coming therefore, he felt no actual pain, it was a complete mercy killing. This justifiable homicide provided by George was a way for Lennie to be set free, not murdered. At least he wasn’t tortured or even lynched, he died peacefully.…
For me it is hard to say whether this is justified or unjustified. I never believe that killing someone is the answer, but at the same time it was almost as if George was doing him a favor. He would have ended up in jail for committing murder or possibly died a slow miserable death from Curley. “The little evening breeze blew over the clearing and the leaves rustled and the wind waves flowed up the green pool. And the shouts of men sounded again, much time this closer than before,” (pg. 104). This was shortly before George pulled the trigger on Lennie. The men were coming after him, and George knew this. Euthanasia I feel like is justifiable in this case, and in fact pretty much all cases. Lennie didn’t mean to kill Curley’s wife, he didn’t realize his own strength and that was his tragic flaw. I don’t think punishing him would be the thing to do. He would never intentionally hurt anyone; he just didn’t realize how much strength he…