Preview

Oliver Cromwell a Hero or a Villain

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1393 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Oliver Cromwell a Hero or a Villain
Oliver Cromwell was born in 25 April 1599 in a town in England called Huntington. He went to school at Huntington Grammar School then went to Sydney Sussex Collage at Cambridge.
He studied law at Cambridge and then went to London and became the MP for Huntington in 1628 and MP for Cambridge in 1640. In 1630’s Oliver Cromwell became Puritan due to a religious crisis and started to become a Radical Puritan when he elected to represent Cambridge, first in the Short parliament, then in the Long parliament. In Parliament, Oliver Cromwell was a strong critic of King Charles the 2nd and in 1642, when King Charles the 2nd started the English Civil War, Oliver Cromwell started to raise troops and joined the Parliamentary forces, fighting against King Charles the 2nd. It is in the English Civil War where Oliver Cromwell gains his renown and fame.

In the beginning of the English Civil War, Oliver Cromwell became a cavalry commander. Even though he had no military experience, he had a good knowledge of horses due to his experience of being a large landowner. Oliver Cromwell rose thought the ranks really quickly first a colonel in 1643, then in 1644, Oliver Cromwell became Lieutenant-General of the 
Eastern Association Army and in 1645 he became Lieutenant-General of the New Model Army.
The reason why Oliver Cromwell became such a good cavalry commander is because he knew a well-disciplined army is very important in war.

Oliver Cromwell first noticed that Prince Rupert's cavalry were not very well disciplined and they do not rally after a charge, instead, Prince Rupert’s cavalry just pursuit their own targets. In the first major battle in the English civil war at the battle of Edgehill, Prince Rupert’s cavalry did not return to the battlefield until 1 hour after the initial charge at the Parliamentary forces in which Prince Rupert’s cavalry horses did not have the strength to mount another charge against enemy forces. Oliver Cromwell saw Prince Rupert’s cavalry tactic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Poor health was always the go to excuse for Sir Fairfax whenever it came to political involvement. Though the Captain-General of the New Model Army was a military mastermind, he turned over nearly all politics to his second in command, Oliver Cromwell, to handle. It is possible that the reason why Fairfax was such an involved field commander was that he was looking for ways to stay away from parliament. At the beginning of the Putney Debates, Sir Thomas Fairfax turned suddenly ill, and he selected Cromwell to take his place as moderator of the debates. Similar actions continued during the king’s trial.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meet Paul Revere, he was born, December 1734, in North End Boston. When he Learned in North Writing School he acquired his main education, additionally, his father trained him into being a skilled silversmith. Eventually he opened his own successful business and was even famous for one of his bowls. Meet Paul Revere, he was born, December 1734, in North End Boston. When he Learned in North Writing School he acquired his main education, additionally, his father trained him into being a skilled silversmith. Eventually he opened his own successful business and was even famous for one of his bowls.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Battle of bosworth

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moreover Tudor had a very strong tactical setup going into the war, the vanguard, under the control of the Earl of oxford, was strengthened by the mercenaries of Philibert de Chandee, Sir Gilbert Talbot commanded the right wing and john savage on the left wing. However, the most important part of their strategy was the Stanley’s. The Stanley’s had been pushing towards the side of Richard due to the capture of Lord Strange, However during the time leading up to the battle negotiations and meetings between Tudor and the Stanley’s were building and Richard started to question whether he could trust them. Tudor began to gain more and more support as he travelled through wales and the key sign of allegiance to Tudor was when the Stanley family advised the bailiffs of Shrewsbury to open the town gates to let them in. So, the Stanley’s did not actively fight at the beginning of the battle but their betrayal soon became apparent when they attacked Richard near the conclusion of the battle. Other higher powers that Richard thought he would have the support of also backed out, for example Northumberland decided to not take part in the battle at all.…

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Paine was born in 1737 January 29, England. Thomas grew up as the only child, his sister died when she was a baby. Thomas parents had different religion. Thomas Paine went to Thetford grammar school. He dropped out school when he was 12. Thomas Paine meet Benjamin Franklin which made him move to the Americas…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oliver Cromwell was a key figure in the failure of finding an acceptable settlement during the interregnum as both Cromwell and his supporters 'Cromwellians' were key causes in the creating division. After Cromwell's appointment of Commander-in-Chief in June 1650 and his appointment as Head of State in December 1653 many problems began to rise above the surface. The first of the…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meet Oliver Ellsworth. Born on April 29, 1745. Ellsworth’s parents were Captian David and Jeminma Ellsworth. When he first started college he attended Yale. At Yale he studied theology, but Yale just wasn’t his fit.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the devastating fall of Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, to the rise of his successor, the relentless Thomas Cromwell. Cromwell, throughout the course of English history has continually been portrayed as the main villain during Henry VIII’s reign, aside from Henry himself of course. A man, who thought nothing of betraying friends or allies in his conquest to secure the most notorious career in history. Since Henry VIII sent his chief minister and close advisor to the scaffold five centuries ago on 28 July 1540, historians have debated on the characterisation of Cromwell. Was he a manipulative death merchant who, throughout his political career killed and victimised thousands of innocent people for obeying their religious beliefs. Or was Cromwell simply a man of modest decent, risen from the ashes of his poor upbringing, due to his impeccable intelligence and determination?…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first argument as to why William won the Battle of Hastings is that he had the best army. The Normans had 7500 men, all fully trained compared to the 4500 voluntary village workers and only 500 professionally trained soldiers that made up Harold Godwinson’s English army. William had many archers and slingshots, the Normans were also equipped with auxiliaries - blacksmiths, carpenters, medics and cooks – as well as a few mercenaries, who were professional soldiers that fought for whoever paid them the most amount of money.…

    • 676 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two hundred years earlier the Puritan movement, led to the installment of Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell had temporarily overthrown the British monarchy. He imposed a strict moral code on the people. Cromwell's objective was of spiritual and moral reform. He wanted to restore liberty of conscience and promote both outward and inward godliness throughout England. Cromwell even installed a set of "triers" assess the suitability of future parish ministers, and also a set of "ejectors" to dismiss ministers and schoolmasters who were deemed unsuitable for office. After Cromwell’s death the monarchy had been restored and the two social forces of Puritanism and libertinism continued to motivate the collective psyche of Great Britain. Religious morality…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reflection on James Burke I disagree with James Burke when he emphasizes the importance of the stirrup in the Battle of Hastings. What he says is that the stirrup was the most vital piece in that specific battle. However, what I believe to be the largest contributing factor to William's victory was when he led the Saxons off of their high ground in order to fully utilize their cavalry to their full extent. The stirrup then did have a great impact in the ensuing slaughter but it had no true outstanding position in the vital move, which truly changed the course of the battle.…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The English Civil War began in 1642 between King Charles I and Parliament. Wealthy nobles, known as Royalists, supported the king. Supporters of Parliament included Puritans, who were led by Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell eventually became commander-in-chief of Parliament’s army. A number of battles took place between the king’s troops and Cromwell’s army, some of which are shown on the map below. The first battle, which took place at Edgehill, did not gain ground for either side. After a series of victories, however, Cromwell and Parliament took control of London and, eventually, England. In 1649 Charles I was publicly beheaded, and Parliament alone ruled England.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1629 Chares the 1st suspended parliament and decided to rule as an absolute monarchy. However, he soon began to run out of money and begged for parliament to levy taxes once again. Kind Charles began to irritate parliament by suspending them again twice in one year. This caused the outbreak of the English Civil War in 1642. It was Cavaliers vs. Roundheads. Oliver Cromwell was the leader of the Roundheads and defeated the kings forces in 1649. The significance of this war was for parliament to not levy the taxes the Charles demanded. Parliament…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The average kid grows up learning that Benedict Arnold is known as the one of the greatest leaders of all times. He was a well-respected general but yet congress would not acknowledge him for his heroism. Displaying this betray towards the once loved general was shown at freeman's farm, the once place Benedict Arnold fought in the great Saratoga battle. There the famous boot monument stands displaying not only Arnold's heroism but treason as well. The "boot monument” tells the story of his wounded left leg during the great Saratoga battle. On the contrary, the monument does not display his name. This factor is because of his recorded history of treason. It is clearly shown that the monument represents benedict Arnold, but because so many people feel strongly about not having a traitor honored at a memorial sight; his name just could not be displayed. The fact of the matter is Benedict Arnold was a true die hard American and would do anything for his country; but He also shares the name as the biggest American traitor in history. Which is it? Does benedict hold the name for greatest leader of all time or traitor? Although the question is a great debate there are factors that support both ends.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition the colonies' governors quarreled with their assemblies. The colonies saw themselves, at the time, as trading economic colonies, not an empire or nation. There was no need or want for a military and military organization. The British colonies were unfit to carry out an offensive war. Victory was meek for the colonies but courageous, fearless and heroic generals like Pitt, Amherst, and Wolf helped turn the tide for the British.…

    • 370 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robin Hood, one of history’s most popular fictional characters, continues to entertain and inspire people of all ages. Hood’s hawk-eyed archery and fierce swordplay make him popular with kids, and his social conscience endears him to old. With tales as early as the twelve hundreds, Robin Hood’s adventures have undoubtedly left their mark on history. Hood’s highly noted reputation of “robbing the rich to give to the poor” is remembered as fondly as his outlandish, green attire. Although a timeless tale with countless heroic deeds not all favor Robin Hood’s actions. Some view him as a roguish miscreant, a person rebelling against the law for his own selfish gains. Therefore, one question remains, does Robin Hood’s legacy portray him as an outlaw or hero?…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays