With this background in mind, the authors then discuss the ethnicity paradigm and the phases it underwent throughout
With this background in mind, the authors then discuss the ethnicity paradigm and the phases it underwent throughout
In the article “Racial Formations,” Omi and Winant described race as being constructed in a social, political, and historical context, which is constantly changed by evolving socio-political climates. Historically, conceptualizations of race began to differentiate between White and non-White, which was often rigidly reinforced. Race became a way to stereotype and categorize people in order quick assumptions, which continues to be deeply ingrained in U.S. culture. Omi and Winant advocate that rather than aiming to eliminate the concept of race, we should aim to understand race as an unstable and complex concept that is continually transformed.…
1) Use the readings from the class on the Social Construction of Race/Ethnicity to answer the following questions: A) Explain the differences between religious, biological, and social views about race. How did they emerge, and what are the implications of each according to Omi and Winant? B) Explain Omi and Winant’s Racial Formation theory. How does it work in the micro (individual interactions) level? How does it work at the macro (societal level)?…
Omi and Winant describe racial projects as representations or explanations of racial dynamics in an effort to reorganize and redistribute resources along particular racial lines. Racial projects encompass everything from depictions in television and music, to legislative processes or even newspaper headlines. They are a result of “New Racism”. A popular example is the war on drugs. On the outside, it seems racially neutral. It is a campaign seeking to end drug abuse. However, the ways in which policies are enacted single out men of color. Police profiling and everyday prejudice leads many African Americans to be singled out and carted off to jail. When looking at statistics, it seems as if this so called war on drugs was just an effort to incarcerate…
The racial formation theory was developed by Michael Omi and Howard Winant, thus publishing the book “Racial Formation”. Omi and Winant describe racial formation as “the socio historical process by which racial categories are created, inhabited, transformed, and destroyed”. They argue this theory in two steps; the first being the projects and secondly the evolution of hegemony. In the reading, it points out the fact that race and politics go hand and hand, they suggest revoking any piece of legislation and undo any court decision that involves or awards treatment based on race. In order for this to happen, one must understand the meaning of race.…
Schaefer, R. T. (2006). Racial and Ethnic Groups (sixth ed.). Retrieved from University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.…
Matthew Frye Jacobson’s introduction of his book Whiteness of a Difference Color delves into the topic of race from a very different perspective than what one would might expect. Instead of discussing the topic about people of color, he writes about the history of racial classification of whites in America along with how the conception and perception of race is always changing. The first example he provides us is with a Gentle women and the debate over Jews’ racial identity, although they are white, what white racial sub group do they belong in-- the Caucasian or Semite? This conversation reveals the exact logical fallacies in our perception of race. He then touches upon other groups that immigrated from their homeland to America. These individuals came to america as “free white persons” but due to naturalization laws, they technically were not put into that category. With that noted, over time these immigrants were finally able to be included in the definition of what we know as white today. Jacobson’s argues that although white people come from different backgrounds and have different ethnicities, we are conditioned to recognize…
A difficulty of studying ethnicity is deciding who is included in an ethnic group, whether by continent, country, religion, etc……
In general, skin color has been taught to be the indicator of how we categorize people, particularly in American culture one can see that this idea of placing emphasis on skin color to group ourselves has stood for a while because we have believed it to be true. Part of the construction of skin color is that it playa a large part in our culture already. Such as the implementation of the one-drop rule being passed as a way of prohibiting miscegenation between whites in blacks in America. In “Who is Black? One Nation’s Definition,” Sociologist James Davis contends that “because blacks are define according to the one-drop rule, they are a socially constructed category in which there is a wide variation in racial traits and therefore not a race group in the scientific sense” (63). Inclusively, the United State Census has also used skin color to determine the population’s demographics; however, it was only until much recently that they began to consider ethnicity over skin color. If the indicator of skin color were not present as to determine who is what then we would not see the color of skin but rather language or geographical location as to determine identity. The relationship merely lies on physical attributes that the marker makes us do and what it culturally influences us to do. Davis suggests that…
2. The concept of racial projects is a part of the racial formation theory that Omi and Winant describe as dealing with the process that surrounds race. Ongoing with racial formation, racial projects are here to provide these racial categories that take place in society. We have these racial projects; however, I feel that these projects leads to competition and battles to define what race is and how race plays a role in society.…
Berthoud modood and smith (1997) define ethnic group as follows: a community whose heritage offers important characteristics in common between its members and which makes them distinct from other communities. There is a boundary, which separates ‘us’ from ‘them’, and the distinction would probably be recognized on both sides of that boundary. Ethnicity is a multi-faceted phenomenon based on physical appearance, subjective identification, cultural and religious affiliation, stereotyping, and social exclusion.…
The ethnicity of a person is shown by where a person is from and their culture and their language. A person that is called “black” does not show how a person has ethnicity but if a person had parents from a country in Africa and was born in the same country in Africa and learned about the culture and language that makes a person ethnic. When people say a person is generally white or black it does not show their ethnicity. It shows lack of understanding of where a person is actually from and if they know their ethnicity or not. The second epiphenomena of race that Omi and Winant stated is nation. The nation shows how people who are not together in the world actually come together to become a nation. People do this to try and come together with common elements of culture, language or history to inhabit a territory or country. Although these people come together, it does not mean that they agree on these same views. The last epiphenomena of race that Omi and Winant stated is Class. Class is important because from Karl Marx’s idea on class to now, class is still in the world today. In America, there are different classes such as Upper class, upper middle class, middle class, lower middle class and lower class. Depending on what job a person has and sometimes what nationality a person is, it categorizes them into the class system. The system is set up so that the people that…
In this reading, Mary C. Waters explains, six different aspects, ethnic identity for whites in the 1990s, the ethnic miracle, symbolic ethnicities for white Americans, race relations and symbolic ethnicity, relations on college campuses, and institutional responses. Ethnic identity for whites in the 1990s states, ethnicity is a social phenomenon, not a biological one. Whites are able to claim an ethnicity if they chose so, or they could just be white. Whites are the majority groups, who have the most power. The ethnic miracle explains, by the 1990s most European-origin ethnic groups in the United States were composed of a very small number of immigrants, and a very large amount of people whose link to their ethnic origins in Europe was increasingly…
Over the past several centuries, race was viewed as a natural condition. This conviction gradually gave way during the 1900s to a new paradigm of thinking about race. Race was now seen as being subordinate to presumably more durable relationships of culture, economic interest, and nationality. This view has recently been superseded by a more critical perspective that sets aside the illusionary aspect of race (Kivisto,…
In modern American society, we ask ourselves about the importance of our cultures. How does our cultural identity define us, if at all—and what exactly does it mean to be an American? Throughout history, and despite a past peppered with racial discrimination, America has always been an amalgamation of countless cultural identities. With this in mind, it can be safely said that in today’s society, race most definitely matters. Before the reasons of why race matters can be determined, we must first define what it means to be an American, the concept of race, and more importantly, ethnicity.…
Alba, R. D. (1990). Ethnic identity: The transformation of White America. NewHaven, CT:Yale University Press.…