Preview

On Liberty By John Mill

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1928 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
On Liberty By John Mill
John Mill is a British philosopher, has been called the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the 19th century (John Mill Biography). John Mill published his on liberty book in 1859, In "On Liberty" book by John Mill he discussed and he debated the concept of personal liberty, and the limitation of the discussion (On Liberty book, pg iii,iv, and the cover page). In this book John Mills discussed very important points which are The Struggle between Liberty and Authority, Tyranny of the Majority, Self-Regarding Actions and Autonomy, The Veracity of Public Opinion, Religion and Liberty, and Coercion. Those points are related to the debate video which we saw in class "The Agenda: Mark Steyn" which I will explain each one of them and …show more content…
If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by it's collision with error" (On Liberty: chapter 2, pg 14). Mill asserts that The government is much more dangerous when they follow on unfaithful and uncertain public opinions. However, public opinion is the most popular passion of humanity, but forming this opinion requires the silencing of most of the voices because the minority opinions is very hurtful even if their doesn't know their opinions are wrong or right. If a silenced opinion is right, that means that the people in public still doesn't know the truth. Well as if the minority opinion is wrong, it leads to "the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth."(On Liberty book: chapter 2, pg 14). Mill also said that "the usefulness of an opinion is itself matter of opinion: as disputable, as open to discussion and requiring discussion as much, as the opinion itself.....there can be no fair discussion of the question of usefulness, when an argument so vital may be …show more content…
Firstly Mark Steyn used the Coercion point which is harming the Muslim people by the words he said in his book as he said that Islam and muslim people are terrorists because their ethnic ties with their home countries were severed. Their young feel rejected by their host countries, deprived of opportunities by the prevalence of employment discrimination (Review of America Alone by Mark Steyn). He also harm them when he said that Islam is weak and unsure religion, but actually that is not true because Islam religion is strong from so many years and muslim people are everywhere around the world, they are sepreding there religion around the whole world, so Mark used the Religion and Liberty point and he also used the point of the struggle between liberty and authority. As in the debate we watched in class he was so agresive and nervous when he came to the point which is he facing some of the muslim people whose get harmed by his words, even thou he wasn’t sure about what he wrote in his book about Islam and he only wrote the book from only his point of view, which is wrong. Mills argued that in his on liberty book as he said that we should not judge anyone about their religion and we he also put the limitation of discussion because people not harm each

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Mill begins his essay by expressing a concern with the amount of control that society can exert over an individual 's liberty. Mill is afraid of the "the tyranny of the majority"1 and suggests that one should protect himself not only from the tyranny of the state itself, but also from the prevailing opinions of the majority. He says that the opinions of the majority become the rules and laws…

    • 2441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    iv. Image of Spanish brutality in the New World atrocities of Spanish rule widely circulated, murderous and tyrannical…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    God of Liberty, written by Baylor University’s history professor Thomas S. Kidd, was overall a bit confusing to say the least. “It is a history of evangelical Protestantism in America, a study that links the religious beliefs of our Founders into a political alliance and, finally, a meditation on religion’s role in today’s increasingly secular American political scene.” This book is the reminder of how huge religion played a role in creating this country. This is important I believe because, while the people remember how it happened and who did the building of this country, I believe that religion provided the morals that they set this nation to be built on. It starts off in the 13 British Colonial ventures in North America were a place of contradicting religious beliefs. The only problem was that most of the early settlers who were coming to our country were trying to flee the dangerous intolerance on England’s religious wars between Catholics and Protestants. These wars were between the Church of England and the various denomination sects; and political conflicts that had many religious ties involving the Scottish and Irish dependencies. Although at the time, our Founders did not hesitate to deny anyone…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Stuart Mills believed very strongly in individual liberty and freedom. However I think that it is first important to state that Mills did not believe in unlimited liberty. He thought that this would lead to conflict, and therefore he believed that government was essential. He believed that the role of the government should be to protect citizens from such conflict, yet still allow for individual liberty and progress.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    and religious doctrines. John Locke was a British Enlightenment philosopher, he had a very big impact on the American Revolution and the colonists belief in self-government. John Locke believed that people had natural rights when they were born. He said that when someone was born they were free, equal, and had natural rights of life, liberty, and property and that rulers couldn’t take it away. John Locke’s ideas were constitutional and they challenged centuries of thinking, in regard of rulers and the people.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Give Me Liberty Summary

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages

    African-Americans during Reconstruction and American Indians in the Gilded Age share similar and differences during its history. In the book titled, Give Me Liberty!, by Eric Foner, talks about the history of African-Americans during Reconstruction and how it required states to ratify the fourteenth Amendment and permit freedmen to vote. Forner also talked about the history of American Indians during the Gilded Age and their experiences and how it signified the dangers of mass cultural incorporation. Both events share similar and different histories such as both events include General Howard and his contribution to African-Americans and American Indians. The histories link to each other when it comes…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also presents the idea that “whatever the risks, the people must be informed, especially on those matters relating to the government” (110). Mill would first agree that people must be informed and ideas must not be suppressed due to those ideas potentially being true. However, Mill would also be concerned with Fuller’s statement “whatever the risks.” This is because Mill emphasizes the idea that opinion needs to be debated. When people are being given information through newspapers or other resources as Fuller uses as examples, particularly those containing political opinion, it is a one-sided conversation. People’s ideas may not be 100% true because they may not understand their opinion whole-heartedly, or the opinion is weakened without a discussion taking place. As said in Mill’s third point, a misunderstanding of the opinion can lead to serious mistakes. This was evident in Fuller’s chapter when the government officials did not want to give up their franking privileges, and postal monetary deficits were created…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history philosophers have introduced new ideas and belief systems into society in hopes to better the world they lived in. Many philosophers have introduced ideas that are still in practice in American government. While popular belief among those trying to pave a path forward was that government, as it stood, was tyrannical and overly restrictive, however John Stuart Mill believed that through government happiness and freedom can be achieved.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Early American Identity was shaped by different historical documents and concepts from the Enlightenment. The documents The Declaration of Independence, The Preamble, Of Plymouth Plantation by William Bradford, and “ The Crisis” by Thomas Paine explore this idea through the development of colonial America and the obstacles they had to overcome that led to what the United States is today. The Enlightenment was essential in deciding practically every part of Colonial America, most importantly legislative issues, government, and religion. Without the Enlightenment, The United states could have been something completely different since these concepts are what our laws are all about and what our country is formed by.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Stuart Mill once said, “The amount of eccentricity in a society has generally been proportional to the amount of genius, mental vigor, and moral courage it contained. That so few now dare to be eccentric marks the chief danger of the time.” John Stuart Mill is one of the most prominent English-speaking philosophers during the 19th century. His works incorporated a huge range of topics in his articles and papers he has written, in which a few of them include A System of Logic, On Liberty, and Utilitarianism. Mill’s main goal when composing On Liberty was best seen by taking a gander at how he talked about his work in his Autobiography. Mill composed that he accepted On Liberty to show the significance to man and to the society, of an extensive variety on sorts of character, and the opportunity given to human instinct to extend itself in…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading the federalist papers, I would like to take a different approach to name a faction. While I believe many will list political parties, lobbyists, corporations, and unions. I am going to list abolitionists as a faction. But first, what is a faction? A faction is a group, whether a majority or minority, who are united "by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” (“Federalist No. 10”). To reiterate, a faction can be a special interest group or any group of people with a common agenda.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    10, Madison presents a purpose of representation that is significantly different from Mill – representatives should “refine and enlarge the public view, by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens . . .” (Hamilton 58) – much less of a direct democracy. He believes in the importance of representatives being accountable to their constituents, but not to the uber-pluribus extent argued by Mill. A representative should be tied closely enough to his constituents to understand all of their views, but should not follow their every wish. The representatives, through deliberation, can come to an understanding of the public view that is not based on “temporary or partial considerations” (Hamilton 59).…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberty is define as “The positive enjoyment of various social, political, or economic rights and privilege and the power of choice”-.Merriam-Webster. In early America, the British were not helping America grow for the better and not giving them any amount of liberty. Instead they were doing harm and angering the people. After every situation where there could have been a better solution and peace, turned to only angry and eventually war. In America, each colony stepped up with leaders to come together and fight for liberty. Fantastically, these leaders stepped up and stood their ground against Britain. They created a document called the Declaration of Independence and many more that would free America form an iron grip to changing America’s legacy for the better.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    all men exist in "a state of perfect freedom to order their actions and dispose…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many differing views on the nature of justice. Some philosophers like John Locke and Frederich Nietzsche advocate the importance of individualism. However, John Stuart Mill strongly urges the vitality of concern for thy neighbor and the use of debate. Within each individual’s ideology I can see the positives. However, when it comes to the nature of justice I think the strong sense of personal goals in individualism and the allocation of debate in Mill’s ideals is what will bring the best for society.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays