Openness in Personality
Traits are consistent patterns of thoughts, feelings, or actions that distinguish people from one another. Traits are basis tendencies that remain stable across the life span, but characteristic behaviour can change considerably through adaptive pr ocesses. A trait is an internal characteristic that corresponds to an extreme position on a behavioural dimension.
There have been different theoretical perspectives in the field of personality psychology over the years including human motivation, the whole person, and individual differences. The Big Five falls under the perspective of individual differences.
In contemporary psychology, the "Big Five" factors (or Five Factor Model; FFM) of personality are five broad domains or dimensions of personality that are used to describe human personality.
Openness is a general appreciation for art, emotion, adventure, unusual ideas, imagination, curiosity, and variety of experience. People who are open to experience are intellectually curious, appreciative of art, and sensitive to beauty. They tend to be, when compared to closed people, more creative and more aware of their feelings. They are more likely to hold unconventional beliefs. Another characteristic of the open cognitive style is a facility for thinking in symbols and abstractions far removed from concrete experience. People with low scores on openness tend to have more conventional, traditional interests. They prefer the plain, straightforward, and obvious over the complex, ambiguous, and subtle. They may regard the arts and sciences with suspicion or even view these endeavors as uninteresting. Closed people prefer familiarity over novelty; they are conservative and resistant to change.[34
Openness is one of the five personality traits of the Big Five personality theory. It indicates how open-minded a person is. A person with a high level of openness to experience in a personality test enjoys trying new things. They are imaginative, curious, and open-minded.
There have been different theoretical perspectives in the field of personality psychology over the years including human motivation, the whole person, and individual differences. The Big Five falls under the perspective of individual differences.
In contemporary psychology, the "Big Five" factors (or Five Factor Model; FFM) of personality are five broad domains or dimensions of personality that are used to describe human personality.
Openness is a general appreciation for art, emotion, adventure, unusual ideas, imagination, curiosity, and variety of experience. People who are open to experience are intellectually curious, appreciative of art, and sensitive to beauty. They tend to be, when compared to closed people, more creative and more aware of their feelings. They are more likely to hold unconventional beliefs. Another characteristic of the open cognitive style is a facility for thinking in symbols and abstractions far removed from concrete experience. People with low scores on openness tend to have more conventional, traditional interests. They prefer the plain, straightforward, and obvious over the complex, ambiguous, and subtle. They may regard the arts and sciences with suspicion or even view these endeavors as uninteresting. Closed people prefer familiarity over novelty; they are conservative and resistant to change.[34
Openness is one of the five personality traits of the Big Five personality theory. It indicates how open-minded a person is. A person with a high level of openness to experience in a personality test enjoys trying new things. They are imaginative, curious, and open-minded.
References: 1. Barefoot JC, Mortensen EL, Helms MJ, Avlund K, Schroll M. A longitudinal study of gender differences in depressive symptoms from age 50 to 80. Psychology and Aging. 2001;16:342–345. [PubMed] 2 4. Budaev SV. Sex differences in the big five personality factors: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences. 1999;26:801–813. 5. Buss DM. Evolutionary psychology - a new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry. 1995;6:1–30. 6. Chapman BP. Bandwidth and fidelity on the NEO-FFI: Replicability and reliability of Saucier 's (1998) item cluster subcomponents. Journal of Personality Assessment. in press. 7. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:155–159. 10. Costa PT, Terracciano A, McCrae RR. Gender differences in =pPersonality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001;81:322–331. [PubMed] 11 14. Flora DB, Curran PJ. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods. 2004;9:446–491. [PubMed] 15 16. Goodwin RD, Gotlib IH. Gender differences in depression: The role of personality factors. Psychiatry Research. 2004;126:135–142. [PubMed] 17 22. Lowe PA, Reynolds CR. Psychometric properties of the adult manifest anxiety scale-elderly version scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2006;66:93–115. 23. Lyness JM, Duberstein PR, King DA, Cox C, Caine ED. Medical illness burden, trait neuroticism, and depression in older primary care patients. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1998;155(7):969–971. [PubMed] 24 25. Marsh HW, Hau KT, Wen Z. In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler 's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling. 2004;11:320–341. 26. McCrae RR, Terracciano A, et al. Universal features of personality traits from the observer 's perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;88:547–561. [PubMed] 27 28. Raykov T. On the use of confirmatory factor analysis in personality research. Personality and Individual Differences. 1998;24:291–293. 29. Reynolds CR. Need we measure anxiety differently for males and females? Journal of Personality Assessment. 1998;70:212–221. [PubMed] 30 31. Saris WE, Aalberts C. Different explanations for correlated disturbance terms in MTMM studies. Structural Equation Modeling. 2003;10:193–213. 32. Saucier G. Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO five-factor inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1998;70:263–276. [PubMed] 33 34. Smith TW, Spiro A., III Personality, health, and aging: Prolegomenon for the next generation. Journal of Research in Personality. 2002;36:363–394. 35. Terracciano A, McCrae RR, Brant LJ, Costa PT. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of the NEO-PI-R scales in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Psychology and Aging. 2005;20:493–506. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 36